Substance-specific separation

In spite of numerous advances in the field of detection there are not and never have been any genuinely substance-specific chemical detection reactions. This means that, unlike the spectrometric methods, the methods of detection normally employed in chromatography cannot be employed for an unequivocal identification of compounds, they can only provide more or less definite indications for the characterization of the separated substances. Universal reagents are usually employed for a first analysis of the separation of samples of unknowns. This is then followed by the use of group-specific reagents. The more individual the pieces of information that can be provided from various sources for a presumed substance the more certainly is its presence indicated. However, all this evidence remains indicative it is not a confirmation of identity. 

Substances which do not exhibit such properties have to be transformed into detectable substances (denvatives) in order to evaluate the TLC separation Such reactions can be performed as universal reactions or selectively on the basis of suitable functional groups Substance-specific derivatization is practically impossible... 

Impregnation with ammonium acetate or ammonium hydrogen sulfate serves the same purpose [11-13]. In conjunction with the TLC separation previously carried out it is even possible to obtain group-speciHc and sometimes substance-specific information. 

It is very often advantageous in thin-layer chromatography to be able to obtain a preliminary impression of a substance separation by first exposing the plate to a rapidly carried out, economically priced universal reaction before passing on to final characterization using group-specific or even better substance-specific reactions. 

Photomultipliers are appreciably more sensitive sensors than the eye in their response to line or continuum sources. Monochromators are fitted to the light beam in order to be able to operate as substance-specifically as possible [5]. Additional filter combinations (monochromatic and cut-off filters) are needed for the measurement of fluorescence. Appropriate instruments are not only suitable for the qualitative detection of separated substances (scanning absorption or fluorescence along the chromatogram) but also for characterization of the substance (recording of spectra in addition to hRf) and for quantitative determinations. 

Since SERS and SERRS are substance specific, they are ideal for characterisation and identification of chromatographically separated compounds. SE(R)R is not, unfortunately, as generally applicable as MS or FUR, because the method requires silver sol adsorption, which is strongly analyte-dependent. SE(R)R should, moreover, be considered as a qualitative rather than a quantitative technique, because the absolute activity of the silver sol is batch dependent and the signal intensity within a TLC spot is inhomogeneously distributed. TLC-FTIR and TLC-RS are considered to be more generally applicable methods, but much less sensitive than TLC-FT-SERS FT-Raman offers p,m resolution levels, as compared to about 10p,m for FTIR. TLC-Raman has been reviewed [721],... 

For exact identification of polymers it is important for the samples to be in the form of pure products without incorporated additives such as plasticizers, fillers, or stabilizers. One must separate additives by extraction or reprecipitation before identification. The solvents or mixtures of solvent and precipitant are substance-specific and should be chosen separately for each case. 

The isolation of paclitaxel exemplifies that most preparative separations must be downsized to a level where a limited number of individual compounds are present to ease the final purification steps. This downsizing of the separation problem can be done by crude separations or by a cascade of consecutive chromatographic separation steps. One finally ends up at a point where a multicomponent mixture with a broad concentration range of the different substances has to be fractionated to a series of mixtures. This approach is described in Fig. 4.4. In general, a mixture can be split into three types of fractions, which each represent a specific separation problem. These three fractions exemplify possible separation scenarios that differ with regard to the ratio of target products and impurities. 

Following the establishment of specificity, the method(s) should be validated to allow for use in release and stability testing. Such validation is typically less stringent than for final methods (sec Chapter 12), but should demonstrate specificity, linearity, range, accuracy, and analysis repeatability for the API. For related substances, specificity should be demonstrated and the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) should be established for the API to serve as surrogate values for the LOD and LOQ of impurities for which authentic substances are not available. To achieve a sufficient LOD and simultaneously keep the API in the linear dynamic range of the detector, it may be necessary to use different sample concentrations for the analyses of the API and related substances. It is additionally beneficial to repeat the separation on new columns from different batches to ascertain that the separation obtained can be maintained column to column. 

Chapter 5 contains a description of the evaluation of substance classes that can be detected from their own color or fluorescence or from components that absorb UV light. Compounds that do not show such properties must be converted into other substances (derivatives) that are detectable in order to evaluate a TLC separation, i.e. they must be derivatized. These can be universal reactions or, if suitable functional groups are present, they can be selective. Substance-specific derivatizations are practically impossible. 

In addition to substances specifically excluded from the TSCA, the EPA has exempted other types of substances from certain TSCA requirements. For example, certain chemical substances—including certain impurities and byproducts—are excluded from TSCA Section 5 requirements because although they are manufactured for commercial purposes under the Act, they are not manufactured for distribution in commerce as chemical substances per se and have no commercial purpose separate from the substance, mixture, or article of which they are a part [10]. 

---