SUBJECTS restricted rotation

As often happen with chemistry concepts, atropisomerism was introduced with one example, which was both limited and clear. Then, it expanded to a general concept that lost its clarity. For this reason it is necessary to define clearly the subject of this review. Atropisomerism in heteroaromatic compounds refers to restricted rotation about a sp -sp bond between two rings one of them or both being an aromatic heterocycle. 

The dimension obtained from random flight calculation, which includes the effects of bond angles and hindrances to rotation about bonds, is referred to as the unperturbed dimension of the polymer chain. It is represented by the symbol (rg ). The subscript zero is used to emphasize the condition that the molecule is subject only to local constraints involving the geometrical character of the bond structure and restricted rotation. 

In addition to constitution and configuration, there is a third important level of structure, that of conformation. Conformations are discrete molecular arrangements that differ in spatial arrangement as a result of facile rotations about single bonds. Usually, conformers are in thermal equilibrium and cannot be separated. The subject of conformational interconversion will be discussed in detail in Chapter 3. A special case of stereoisomerism arises when rotation about single bonds is sufficiently restricted by steric or other factors that- the different conformations can be separated. The term atropisomer is applied to stereoisomers that result fk m restricted bond rotation. ... 

Concerted mechanisms have also been considered to justify the high degree of stereoselectivity observed in many instances as, for example, in the cases shown in Scheme 3 [13,18-21], However, the high stereochemical control often observed in many ODPM rearrangements does not necessary imply that the reaction is taking place via concerted mechanisms. A stepwise process is also consistent with the stereochemical outcome of the reaction, where there are conformational or configurational restrictions to rapid C—C rotation. This subject has been extensively discussed and reviewed by Schuster [16]. 

The analyst should check the Shepard diagram that represents a step line so-called D-hat values. If all reproduced distances fall onto the step-line, then the rank ordering of distances (or similarities) would be perfectly reproduced by the dimensional model, while deviations from the step-line mean lack of fit. The interpretation of the dimensions usually represents the final step of this multivariate procedure. As in factor analysis, the final orientation of axes in the plane (or space) is mostly the result of a subjective decision by the researcher since the distances between objects remain invariable regardless of the type of the rotation. However, it must be remembered that MDS and FA are different methods. FA requires that the underlying data be distributed as multivariate normal, whereas MDS does not impose such a restriction. MDS often yields more interpretable solutions than FA because the latter tends to extract more factors. MDS can be applied to any kind of distances or similarities (those described in cluster analysis), whereas FA requires firstly the computation of the correlation matrix. Figure 7.3 shows the results of applying MDS to the samples described in the CA and FA sections (7.3.1 and 7.3.2). 

---