Subatomic level

The sexing of UPAs as male and female, with the traditional positive/ negative characterization of the genders, makes the essence of matter a kind of subatomic sexual intercourse. Opposites attract and infuse each other with lines of life force pulsing in and out of them. Indeed, contraception at the subatomic level would have catastrophic consequences The UPA... 

One problem remained, that of explaining why the orbiting electrons didn t lose energy and fall into the nucleus. Bohr solved the problem by making the assumption that the laws of electricity and magnetism that said this should happen simply didn t apply to events on the subatomic level. This was the most audacious part of his theory. Never before had any physicist been willing to assume that the known laws of physics were inoperable under certain circumstances. 

A recognition of the unreality of the detached observer in the psychological sciences is becoming widespread, under the topics of experimenter bias 55 and demand characteristics 45. A similar recognition long ago occurred in physics when it was realized that he observed was altered by the process of observation at subatomic levels, when we deal with d-ASCs where the observer is the experiencer of the d-ASC, this factor is of paramount importance. Not knowing the characteristics of the observer can also confound the process of consensual validation. 

Since the historical PV weak force origin /3-decay experiment of 60Co [ 106], theoreticians presumed that the tiny parity violating WNC at molecular and subatomic levels may also allow a distinction between mirror image molecules at the macroscopic level as well. This is because PV-WNC at the molecular level may be a candidate for the homochiral scenario under terrestrial and extraterrestrial conditions [1,2,104,109-118]. The WNC, however, did not induce any observable PV effects between enantiomers in their ground states because of the minuscule PV energy difference (PVED) of 10 19 eV and/or negligibly small 10 - % ee in racemates. Theoreticians also proposed several possible amplification mechanisms at reproducible detection levels within laboratory time scales and at terrestrial locations [113,117,118]. 

The realization that both matter and radiation interact as waves led Werner Heisenberg to the conclusion in 1927 that the act of observation and measurement requires the interaction of one wave with another, resulting in an inherent uncertainty in the location and momentum of particles. This inability to measure phenomena at the subatomic level is known as the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, and it applies to the location and momentum of electrons in an atom. A discussion of the principle and Heisenberg s other contributions to quantum theory is located here http //www.aip.org/historv/heisenberg/. 

As long as our knowledge of the nature of the universe is obtained by observation rather than by inspiration, we would argue that the question cannot be answered. Limits on our ability to observe details at the atomic and subatomic levels, as expressed by Heisenberg s Uncertainty Principle, put the answer permanently beyond our grasp. 

For macroscopic bodies such as a baseball, the increase in mass because of the added eneagy is so small that it is not measurable. It was not even discovered until the beginning of (he twentieth century. At atomic and subatomic levels, however, the conversion of a small quantity of matter into energy is very important It is the energy source of the Sun and the stars, (he atomic bomb, the hydrogen bomb, and nuclear power plants. 

One may be tempted to discuss the system in terms of the interface a plane separating the two phases. This is, however, an ill-defined quantity, since it is not possible to define exactly the boundary of a phase, even a metal, on the subatomic level. In other words, one does not know exactly "where the metal ends". Is it the plane going through the center of the outermost layer of atoms, is it one atomic radius farther out, or is it even farther, where the charge density wave of the free electrons has decayed to essentially zero Fortunately, we do not need to know the position of this plane for most purposes when we discuss the properties of the interphase, as defined earlier. 

Some authors indicate the models belonging to the first category as macroscopic models and those of the second one as microscopic models . This is a misleading definition, as in both sets the main portion, the solute, is treated at the detailed atomic, or subatomic, level necessary for chemical descriptions, which for convenience we may call microscopic. Macroscopic models for solutions are something else, of limited usefulness in order to study the details of chemical processes, and they are not treated in this chapter. 

A substance is a type of matter that has a consistent composition. What I mean is that no matter where you find a specific substance, its composition will be the same. In other words, a molecule of water from India has the same composition as a molecule of water from Canada. There is no real variation in the composition of a substance (except, perhaps, on the subatomic level, as you will learn when we discuss isotopes). There are two major types of substances elements and compounds. 

The second series of inner transition elements, the actinides, have atomic numbers ranging from 90 (thorium, Th) to 103 (lawrencium, Lr). All of the actinides are radioactive, and none beyond uranium (92) occur in nature. Like the transition elements, the chemistry of the lanthanides and actinides is unpredictable because of their complex atomic structures. What could be happening at the subatomic level to explain the properties of the inner transition elements In Chapter 7, you ll study an expanded theory of the atom to answer this question. 

Planck s revolutionary idea about energy provided the basis for Einstein s explanation of the photoelectric effect in 1906 and for the Danish physicist Niels Bohr s atomic model of the hydrogen atom in 1913. Their success, in turn, lent support to Planck s theories, for which he received the Nobel Prize in physics in 1918. In the mid-1920s the combination of Planck s ideas about the particle-like nature of electromagnetic radiation and Erench physicist Louis de Broglie s hypothesis of the wavelike nature of electrons led to the formulation of quantum mechanics, which is still the accepted theory for the behavior of matter at atomic and subatomic levels. 

---