Structure-reactivity relationships Electronic effect

The most frequently encountered hydrolysis reaction in drug instability is that of the ester, but curtain esters can be stable for many years when properly formulated. Substituents can have a dramatic effect on reaction rates. For example, the tert-butyl ester of acetic acid is about 120 times more stable than the methyl ester, which, in turn, is approximately 60 times more stable than the vinyl analog [16]. Structure-reactivity relationships are dealt with in the discipline of physical organic chemistry. Substituent groups may exert electronic (inductive and resonance), steric, and/or hydrogen-bonding effects that can drastically affect the stability of compounds. A detailed treatment of substituent effects can be found in a review by Hansch et al. [17] and in the classical reference text by Hammett [18]. 

A large number of these values are close to the diffusion limit. This is not actually very surprising since the coupling of the aryl radical with the nucleophile has to compete with quite rapid side-reactions, if only its electron-transfer reduction, for the substitution to be effective. When taking place homogeneously, the latter reaction itself at the diffusion limit and the parameter that governs the competition is Anu[Nu ]/Ad[RX]. This is the reason why a discussion of structure-reactivity relationships is necessarily restricted to a rather narrow experimental basis. 

Our work on nucleophile addition to quinone methides is a direct extension of studies on the formation and reaction of ring-substituted benzyl carboca-tions,89,90,128 146 and has shown strong overlap with the interests of Kresge and coworkers. The main goal of this work has been to characterize the effect of the strongly electron-donating 4-0 substituent on the reactivity of the simple benzyl carbocation, with an emphasis on understanding the effect of this substituent on the complex structure reactivity relationships observed for nucleophile addition to benzylic carbocations. 

Structure-Reactivity Relationship of Olefins. The relative reactivity of a series of olefins toward the potent oxidizing species, X, formed by the interaction of TPP Mn(II) with 02, was investigated by means of a competitive reaction technique. As shown in Table VII, the relative reactivity of an olefin, as followed by gas-liquid chromatographic determination, increases on introduction of an alkyl substituent onto the olefinic carbon atom other than the reacting carbon atom. However, the introduction of an alkyl substituent onto the reacting carbon atom reduces (or compensates) the accelerative electronic effect, as seen in the comparison between cyclohexene and n-hexene. This situation becomes clearer if one compares the two dialkyl ethylenes, cyclohexene and methylenecyclohexane, where the former has a single substituent on the reacting carbon and the other has none the observed relative reactivity is 1 27.2. 

The fundamental aspects of structure-reactivity relationships in radiation-induced oxidation of substituted benzenes, bimolecular free electron transfer on the femtosecond time scale, the chemistry of sulfur-centered radicals and the radiolysis of metalloproteins are discussed in succeeding chapters. The effects of the direct and indirect mechanisms of radiation-induced DNA damage are discussed individually in two complementary chapters. The last chapter highlights the application of radiation chemical techniques to antioxidant research. 

The effect that substituents already present have on electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions represents an area of structure-reactivity relationships that has been under study since about 1870. The classification of substituents as activating and ortfto-para-directing or deactivating and mete-directing has been known since those early studies. A basic understanding of these substituent effects became possible when ideas about electronic interactions and resonance theory were... 

The study of structure-reactivity relationships by the organic chemist Hammett showed that there is often a quantitative relationship between the two-dimensional structure of organic molecules and their chemical reactivity. Specifically, he correlated the changes in chemical properties of a molecule that result from a small change in its chemical structure that is, the quantitative linear relationship between electron density at a certain part of a molecule and its tendency to undergo reactions of various types at that site. For example, there is a linear relationship between the effea of remote substituents on the equilibrium constant for the ionization of an acid with the effect of these substituents on the rate or equilibrium constant for many other types of chemical reaction. The relative value of Hammett substituent constants describes the similarity of molecules in terms of electronic properties. Taft expanded the method to include the steric hindrance of access of reagents to the reaction site by nearby substituents, a quantitation of three-dimensional similarity. In addition, Charton, Verloop, Austel, and others extended and refined these ideas. Finally, Hansch and Fujita showed that biological activity frequently is also quantitatively correlated with the hydrophobic character of the substituents. They coined the term QSAR, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, for this type of analysis. 

The concept of a structure-reactivity relationship implies that changes in structure should be quantitatively reflected in some measurable reactivity parameters associated with the molecule. For metal complexes, the capacity of the ligand structure to influence chemical properties is measurable in terms of reactivity parameters such as stability constants, rates of ligand dissociation, and reduction potentials. The influence of structure on chemical reactivity can often be rationalized in terms of steric and electronic components. MM calculations can be used to quantify the steric components present in the system. For metal complexes with series of ligands in which electronic effects are relatively constant (same number and type of donor atoms), reactivity differences can be attributed primarily to steric effects. In such cases, MM calculations have been used to obtain correlations between structure and reactivity. 

Within the context of this book the quantitative relationships between structure and chemical reactivity are very informative. One of the early postulates of Ingold and his school in the 1930s (review see Ingold, 1969, p. 78) was that the electronic effects of substituents are composed of two main parts a field/inductive component and a mesomeric component. Hammett s work indicated clearly from the beginning that his substituent constants am and crp reflect Ingold s postulate in numerical terms. In particular, many observations indicated that the /7-substituent constant ap is the sum of a field/inductive component 0 and a resonance (mesomeric) component (Jr. 

As the chemical models mentioned here refer to some fundamental thermochemical and electronic effects of molecules, their application is not restricted to the prediction of chemical reactivity data. In fact, in the development of the models extensive comparisons were made with physical data, and thus such data can also be predicted from our models. Furthermore, some of the mechanisms responsible for binding substrates to receptors are naturally enough founded on quite similar electronic effects to those responsible for chemical reactivity. This suggest the use of the models developed here to calculate parameters for quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR). 

Quantitative structure-activity relationship studies are of great importance in modern chemistry. From their origin in the study of organic chemistry dating back to the 19th century, these studies have relied on some empirical and qualitative rules about the reactivity similarities of compounds with similar structures. The most significant development in QSARs occurred with the work of Louis Hammett (1894-1987), who correlated some electronic properties of organic acids and bases with their equilibrium constants and reactivity (Johnson, 1973). Hammett postulated that the effect... 

Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) are important for predicting the oxidation potential of chemicals in Fenton s reaction system. To describe reactivity and physicochemical properties of the chemicals, five different molecular descriptors were applied. The dipole moment represents the polarity of a molecule and its effect on the reaction rates HOMo and LUMO approximate the ionization potential and electron affinities, respectively and the log P coefficient correlates the hydrophobicity, which can be an important factor relative to reactivity of substrates in aqueous media. Finally, the effect of the substituents on the reaction rates could be correlated with Hammett constants by Hammett s equation. 

---