Structural analysis of humic substances in water and soils

Various separation methods have been used to isolate, fractionate, and characterize humic materials. Originally it was fractionation, based on solubility differences of humic components in diluted alkalis and acids, which laid the ground work for the first classifications of humic substances (HS) in the 19th century (Mulder, 1861 Sprengel, 1837) and provided for operational definition of HS (Kononova, 1966). And now, alkali extraction is the method of choice for isolating HS from solid humus-containing substrates like soil, peat, coal, and so on (Swift, 1996), while hydrophobic resins (e.g., Amberlite XAD resins) are typically used to extract HS dissolved in natural waters (Aiken, 1985). Initial research on HS began with the used simple separation methods to prove, examine, and define characteristics of components of humic matter (Oden, 1919).Today, however, advances in HS research require ever more sophisticated techniques of separation combined with structural analysis (Orlov, 1990 Stevenson, 1994). 

The most serious problem in the study of humic substances is the lack of reproducibility of analytical results. One would expect soil humates to vary with soil type, aquatic humates to vary with water sources, and coal humates to vary with coal rank. But even within one well-defined source, the elemental composition will vary between samples, depending on extraction and fractionation procedures. There are cases in which the same authors have used the same source and the same extraction procedure and have obtained significantly different elemental analyses. Before any meaningful structural conclusions can be deduced from elemental analysis, a rational definition of humic substances will have to be established (MacCarthy, 1976 Malcolm and MacCarthy, 1979). 

---