Strongly nonlinear systems

This is normally a fairly weak interaction that will only take place in strongly nonlinear systems. 

Solution of large linear and strongly nonlinear systems of equations These are the topics we consider in what follows. We also discuss the use of simulation tools in the modeling of real distillation columns. 

Although this is an old and conceptually straightforward idea, it has not been widely used (except in some recent studies of chaotic dynamics of autonomous systems, where no input variable exists) because several important practical issues must be addressed in its actual implementation, for example, the selection of the appropriate coordinate variables (embedding space) and the impracticality of representation in high-dimensional spaces. If a low-dimensional embedding space can be found for the system under study, this approach can be very powerful in yielding models of strongly nonlinear systems. Secondary practical issues are the choice of an effective test input and the accuracy of the obtained results in the presence of extraneous noise. 

For nonlinear systems we have introduced the Newton-Picard method as an alternative to methods more commonly used in chemical engineering literature. It is found that for the weakly nonlinear System C, Broyden s method is fastest and that the Newton-Picard method needs a CPU time equal to the dynamic simulation. For the more strongly nonlinear System D, Broyden s method is again the fastest but here the Newton-Picard also reduces the CPU time as compared to the dynamic simulation by a factor two. The main drawback of the Newton-Picard method is the lengthy first iteration, which arises from the construction of the Jacobian in order to determine a basis for the slowly converging subspace. 

These cases are representative of a linear system, a mildly nonlinear system and a strongly nonlinear system. As can be seen from the results, the nonlinearity has the effect of shifting the long time asymptotic decay. 

Figure 3 shows the results of the simulations for A = 0.1 and 0.9. These cases are representative of a linear system and a strongly nonlinear system. As can be seen from the results, the nonlinearity has the effect of shifting the long time asynptotic decay. Note that in the gas phase plot also for the surface barrier controlled system there is a shift resulting from the decreasing loading times. Qualitatively this is the same result as for diffusion control. 

The second considered example is described by the monostable potential of the fourth order (x) = ax4/4. In this nonlinear case the applicability of exponential approximation significantly depends on the location of initial distribution and the noise intensity. Nevertheless, the exponential approximation of time evolution of the mean gives qualitatively correct results and may be used as first estimation in wide range of noise intensity (see Fig. 14, a = 1). Moreover, if we will increase noise intensity further, we will see that the error of our approximation decreases and for kT = 50 we obtain that the exponential approximation and the results of computer simulation coincide (see Fig. 15, plotted in the logarithmic scale, a = 1, xo = 3). From this plot we can conclude that the nonlinear system is linearized by a strong noise, an effect which is qualitatively obvious but which should be investigated further by the analysis of variance and higher cumulants. 

Analytical approaches applicable for small and large amplitudes (for weak and strong nonlinearity) of the oscillations in a nonlinear dynamic system subjected to the influence of a wave has been developed (Damgov, 2004 Damgov, Trenchev and Sheiretsky, 2003). 

For quite a number of physically absorbed gases, Henry s law holds very well when the partial pressure of the solute is less than about 101 kPa (1 atm). For partial pressures above 101 kPa, H may be independent of the partial pressure (Fig. 14-1), but this needs to be verified for the particular system of interest. The variation of H with temperature is a strongly nonlinear function of temperature as discussed by Poling, Prausnitz, and O Connell (The Properties of Gases and Liquids, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 2000). Consultation of this reference is recommended when temperature and pressure extrapolations of Henry s law data are needed. 

There are many control challenges in this process. These include strong nonlinearity, distributed system, long deadtimes, and a feedstock that varies significantly because of its biological source. The key variable is kappa number (degree of delignifica-tion), which cannot be measured online, so it must be estimated from secondary measurements. 

Nonlinear problems frequently arise in engineering, but many texts are oriented towards linear problems due to the difficulty of non-linearity. For chemical systems as well as electrochemical systems, the mathematical models are typically nonlinear and even strongly nonlinear due to the nature of kinetics influenced by transport phenomena. 

---