Stress elastic-limit

Stress, elastic limit The greatest stress that a material is capable of sustaining without any permanent strain remaining upon complete release of stress. A material passes its elastic limit when the load is sufficient to initiate non-recoverable deformation. 

Equations 1 to 3 enable the stresses which exist at any point across the wall thickness of a cylindrical shell to be calculated when the material is stressed elastically by applying an internal pressure. The principal stresses cannot be used to determine how thick a shell must be to withstand a particular pressure until a criterion of elastic failure is defined in terms of some limiting combination of the principal stresses. 

Elastic limit the maximum stress a test specimen may be subjected to and which may return to its original length when the stress is released. 

Yield strength or tensile proof stress the maximum stress that can be applied without permanent deformation of the test specimen. For the materials that have an elastic limit (some materials may not have an elastic region) this may be expressed as the value of the stress on... 

In the case of most nonporous minerals at sufficiently low-shock stresses, two shock fronts form. The first wave is the elastic shock, a finite-amplitude essentially elastic wave as indicated in Fig. 4.11. The amplitude of this shock is often called the Hugoniot elastic limit Phel- This would correspond to state 1 of Fig. 4.10(a). The Hugoniot elastic limit is defined as the maximum stress sustainable by a solid in one-dimensional shock compression without irreversible deformation taking place at the shock front. The particle velocity associated with a Hugoniot elastic limit shock is often measured by observing the free-surface velocity profile as, for example, in Fig. 4.16. In the case of a polycrystalline and/or isotropic material at shock stresses at or below HEL> the lateral compressive stress in a plane perpendicular to the shock front... 

The theory is initially presented in the context of small deformations in Section 5.2. A set of internal state variables are introduced as primitive quantities, collectively represented by the symbol k. Qualitative concepts of inelastic deformation are rendered into precise mathematical statements regarding an elastic range bounded by an elastic limit surface, a stress-strain relation, and an evolution equation for the internal state variables. While these qualitative ideas lead in a natural way to the formulation of an elastic limit surface in strain space, an elastic limit surface in stress space arises as a consequence. An assumption that the external work done in small closed cycles of deformation should be nonnegative leads to the existence of an elastic potential and a normality condition. 

Several generalizations of the inelastic theory to large deformations are developed in Section 5.4. In one the stretching (velocity strain) tensor is substituted for the strain rate. In order to make the resulting constitutive equations objective, i.e., invariant to relative rotation between the material and the coordinate frame, the stress rate must be replaced by one of a class of indifferent (objective) stress rates, and the moduli and elastic limit functions must be isotropic. In the elastic case, the constitutive equations reduce to the equation of hypoelastidty. The corresponding inelastic equations are therefore termed hypoinelastic. 

The referential formulation is translated into an equivalent current spatial description in terms of the Cauchy stress tensor and Almansi strain tensor, which have components relative to the current spatial configuration. The spatial constitutive equations take a form similar to the referential equations, but the moduli and elastic limit functions depend on the deformation, showing effects that have misleadingly been called strain-induced hardening and anisotropy. Since the components of spatial tensors change with relative rigid rotation between the coordinate frame and the material, it is relatively difficult to construct specific constitutive functions to represent particular materials. 

The deformation may be viewed as composed of a pure stretch followed by a rigid rotation. Stress and strain tensors may be defined whose components are referred to an intermediate stretched but unrotated spatial configuration. The referential formulation may be translated into an unrotated spatial description by using the equations relating the unrotated stress and strain tensors to their referential counterparts. Again, the unrotated spatial constitutive equations take a form similar to their referential and current spatial counterparts. The unrotated moduli and elastic limit functions depend on the stretch and exhibit so-called strain-induced hardening and anisotropy, but without the effects of rotation. 

Figure 5.2. Particle history and elastic limit surface in stress space.

Elastic. The stress lies within the elastic region and /< 0. Then k = 0 and the elastic limit surface is stationary. 

Inelastic Loading. The stress lies on the elastic limit surface / = 0 but the conditions on / depend on whether the material is hardening, perfectly inelastic, or softening. 

A similar argument leads to the result that, in stress spaee, the normal veloeity of the elastie limit surfaee is given by = fjn where is the magnitude of the normal veetor = d//ds. Consequently, = R(vJvJ where R = njn is a positive sealar, and the hardening index A has the same sign as the ratio of the outward normal veloeities of the elastic limit surfaees in stress spaee and strain spaee, respeetively. 

Softening. When /I < 0 then / < 0. The elastic limit surface in stress space is moving inward, and the material is said to be softening. 

This ambiguity in the stress space loading criterion may be illustrated by considering a stress-strain plot corresponding to simple tension, as shown schematically in Fig. 5.3. With each point on the stress-strain curve past the initial elastic limit point A, there is associated a point on the elastic limit surface in stress space and a point on the elastic limit surface in strain space. On the hardening portion of the stress strain curve AB, both the stress and the strain are increasing, and the respective elastic limit surfaces are moving... 

When the material is at the ultimate stress point B, inelastic loading will entail a positive strain rate, and the elastic limit surface in strain space will be moving outward. On the other hand, the stress rate at this point is zero, and the elastic limit surface in stress space will be stationary. If the material is perfectly inelastic over a range of strains, then the stress rate will be zero and the elastic limit surface in stress space will be stationary on inelastic loading throughout this range. 

The direction of the stress rate in relation to the elastic limit surface in stress space, expressed in /, cannot be used as an unambiguous indicator of loading or unloading. The proper indicator of inelastic loading in stress space is =/// . 

It is possible to show from the inequality (5.55) that the inelastic contribution to the stress rate is directed along the inward normal to the elastic limit surface in strain space, i.e.,... 

The normality conditions (5.56) and (5.57) have essentially the same forms as those derived by Casey and Naghdi [1], [2], [3], but the interpretation is very different. In the present theory, it is clear that the inelastic strain rate e is always normal to the elastic limit surface in stress space. When applied to plasticity, e is the plastic strain rate, which may now be denoted e", and this is always normal to the elastic limit surface, which may now be called the yield surface. Naghdi et al. by contrast, took the internal state variables k to be comprised of the plastic strain e and a scalar hardening parameter k. In their theory, consequently, the plastic strain rate e , being contained in k in (5.57), is not itself normal to the yield surface. This confusion produces quite different results. 

In this section, the general inelastic theory of Section 5.2 will be specialized to a simple phenomenological theory of plasticity. The inelastic strain rate tensor e may be identified with the plastic strain rate tensor e . In order to include isotropic and kinematic hardening, the set of internal state variables, denoted collectively by k in the previous theory, is reduced to the set (k, a) where k is a scalar representing isotropic hardening and a is a symmetric second-order tensor representing kinematic hardening. The elastic limit condition in stress space (5.25), now called a yield condition, becomes... 

The elastic limit conditions in strain space (5.1) and stress space (5.25) become... 

The elastic limit function in stress space may be translated into spatial terms by using (5.151) and (A.39) in (5.135)... 

---