Strain/stress spherical harmonics

The following sections develop three subjects the classical approximations for the strain/stress in isotropic polycrystals, isotropic polycrystals under hydrostatic pressure and the spherical harmonic analysis to determine the average strain/stress tensors and the intergranular strain/stress in textured samples of any crystal and sample symmetry. Most of the expressions that are obtained for the peak shift have the potential to be implemented in the Rietveld routine, but only a few have been implemented already. 

Arguments for recent developments of the spherical harmonics approach for the analysis of the macroscopic strain and stress by diffraction were presented in Section 12.2.3. Resuming, the classical models describing the intergranular strains and stresses are too rough and in many cases cannot explain the strongly nonlinear dependence of the diffraction peak shift on sin even if the texture is accounted for. A possible solution to this problem is to renounce to any physical model to describe the crystallite interactions and to find the strain/ stress orientation distribution functions SODF by inverting the measured strain pole distributions ( h(y)). The SODF fully describe the strain and stress state of the sample. 

Similar to the ODF for texture, SODF can be subjected to a Fourier analysis by using generalized spherical harmonics. However, there are three important differences. The first is that in place of one distribution (ODF), six SODFs are analyzed simultaneously. The components of the strain, or the stress tensor can be used for analysis in the sample or in the crystal reference system. The second difference concerns the invariance to the crystal and the sample symmetry operations. The ODF is invariant to both crystal and sample symmetry operations. By contrast, the six SODFs in the sample reference system are invariant to the crystal symmetry operations but they transform similarly to Equation (65) if the sample reference system is replaced by an equivalent one. Inversely, the SODFs in the crystal reference system transform like Equation (65) if an equivalent one replaces this system and remain invariant to any rotation of the sample reference system. Consequently, for the spherical harmonics coefficients of the SODF one expects selection rules different from those of the ODF. As the third difference, the average over the crystallites in reflection (83) is structurally different from Equations (5)+ (11). In Equation (83) the products of the SODFs with the ODF are integrated, which, in comparison with Equation (5), entails a supplementary difficulty. 

In this product the strain tensor components in the crystallite reference system are used for the SODFs. With this choice the calculation of the macroscopic strains and stresses e, and x,- requires only the harmonic coefficients of /=0 and 1 = 2 (see Section 12.2.6.3). Similar to the ODF [Equation (23)], the WSODFs are expanded in a series of generalized spherical harmonics ... 

---