Stereochemistry conformational control

The stereochemistry is controlled by a stereoelectronic preference for protonation perpendicular to the enolate system and, given that this requirement is met, the stereochemistry normally corresponds to protonation of the most stable conformation of the dianion intermediate from its least hindered side. 

The confomiational preferences and stereoselective reactions of a number of macrocyclic systems have been studied. The stereochemical results have been explained on the basis of the model of local conformer control. The epoxidation of a macrocyclic alkene containing the substitution pattern (21) provides a single epoxide having the stereochemistry (22). A macrocycle containing a l,S-diene system adepts the local confoimation (23) that is iree of torsional strain epoxidation of (23) from the less hindered side fiimishes the syn-diepoxide (24). The MCPBA epoxidations of the unsaturated macrocyclic lactones (25) and (2Q are stereoselective (equations 9 and 10). In the epoxidation of (26) six new chiral centres are introduced the reaction product is a 20 1 1 mixture of triepoxides. The tiiepoxide (27) is closely related to the C(9)-C(23) segment of monensin B. 

A reaction is conformationally controlled if the distribution of products and (or) their stereochemistry depends on the preferred conformation of the reactant. Consider two diastereomerically different conformers, Ct and C2, which must give rise to different products (or product distributions), Pt and P2. 

Anti stereochemistry in six-membered rings Conformational control from a chiral centre in the cyclohexenone Remote stereochemical control in five-membered rings prostaglandins Regio- and stereochemical control in open chain compounds Asymmetric induction by a chiral auxiliary on the enolate Tandem Michael-Michael Reactions One Conjugate Addition Follows Another Double Michael or Diels-Alder reaction ... 

The stereochemistry is controlled by the first conjugate addition represented mechanistically as 50a that gives the new lithium enolate in the right conformation for the second conjugate addition 51 giving the enolate 52 of endo-49. We shall assume that these reactions are tandem Michael-Michael additions for the rest of this section. 

Recent studies on the Cope rearrangement of certain germacrane sesquiterpenoids have disclosed some interesting results on the reversibility and conformational control of stereochemistry in this reaction. Jain et al have demonstrated reversibility in three similar systems associated with costunolide and its derivatives [242, R = CH, a-Me, and CH2N(Me)2]. On the other hand, Takeda et 6,180 Qjjjy observed the reversibility of the Cope rearrangement but... 

The study of optical isomers has shown a similar development. First it was shown that the reduction potentials of several meso and racemic isomers were different (Elving et al., 1965 Feokstistov, 1968 Zavada et al., 1963) and later, studies have been made of the ratio of dljmeso compound isolated from electrolyses which form products capable of showing optical activity. Thus the conformation of the products from the pinacolization of ketones, the reduction of double bonds, the reduction of onium ions and the oxidation of carboxylic acids have been reported by several workers (reviewed by Feokstistov, 1968). Unfortunately, in many of these studies the electrolysis conditions were not controlled and it is therefore too early to draw definite conclusions about the stereochemistry of electrode processes and the possibilities for asymmetric syntheses. 

The first element of stereocontrol in aldol addition reactions of ketone enolates is the enolate structure. Most enolates can exist as two stereoisomers. In Section 1.1.2, we discussed the factors that influence enolate composition. The enolate formed from 2,2-dimethyl-3-pentanone under kinetically controlled conditions is the Z-isomer.5 When it reacts with benzaldehyde only the syn aldol is formed.4 The product stereochemistry is correctly predicted if the TS has a conformation with the phenyl substituent in an equatorial position. 

Entry 5 is an example of the use of fra-(trimethylsilyl)silane as the chain carrier. Entries 6 to 11 show additions of radicals from organomercury reagents to substituted alkenes. In general, the stereochemistry of these reactions is determined by reactant conformation and steric approach control. In Entry 9, for example, addition is from the exo face of the norbornyl ring. Entry 12 is an example of addition of an acyl radical from a selenide. These reactions are subject to competition from decarbonylation, but the relatively slow decarbonylation of aroyl radicals (see Part A, Table 11.3) favors addition in this case. 

Frontier orbital approaches are not yet implemented in EROS. Nor does EROS take account of the features of reactivity which are controlled by orbital symmetries. This will follow the current work on stereochemistry and conformation. 

The opening of the epoxide in the cij-decalin 24 by acetic acid leads exclusively to the hydroxyacetate 25 (through a kinetically controlled rrani-diaxial opening) rather than to the wanted diastereomer 26 (c/ the stereochemistry of the "southern" part of reserpine). To obtain the correct diastereomer the epoxy-lactone 22 is first formed (Scheme 8.6). Thus the conformation of the cij-decalin system, and therefore that of the substituents, is reversed. The kinetic tran -diaxial opening of the epoxide occurs in a regio- and stereoselective manner to afford compound 28 in which the substituents have the correct position and configuration (a-OH, P-OAc),... 

---