Steam drum levels

This fourth criterion can be met at a low steam drum cost. Only one percent of the cost of the boiler spent on the steam drum can provide it. The fourth criterion is met by requiring that the Drum-Level-Stability Factor (D.L.S.F.) be equal to 1.0 minimum. When this exists the steam drum level will be stable for wide and sudden operational changes. 

This steam drum level would be very stable (D.L.S.F. well above 1.0). 

Ellison, G. L., Steam Drum Level Stability Factor, Hydrocarbon Processing, May 1971. 

Density of the fluid whose level is to be measured can have a large effect on level detection instrumentation. It primarily affects level sensing instruments which utilize a wet reference leg. In these instruments, it is possible for the reference leg temperature to be different from the temperature of the fluid whose level is to be measured. An example of this is the level detection instrumentation for a boiler steam drum. The water in the reference leg is at a lower temperature than the water in the steam drum. Therefore, it is more dense, and must be compensated for to ensure the indicated steam drum level is accurately indicated. 

Another method for dealing with high reactor temperatures is to generate steam, as shown in Fig. 4.19. Here we allow the coolant to boil and thereby provide a constant jacket temperature. The secondary loop controls pressure in the boiler drum by venting steam. Fresh boiler feed water is added by level control. A potential problem W ith this arrangement is the possibility for boiler swell that results in an increase in the level due to increased vaporization in the jacket. The increased level due to swell reduces the intake of boiler feed water when in reality it should be increased. This problem can be overcome by providing a ratio controller between the steam flow and the feed water with the ratio reset by the steam drum level controller. Boiler feed water flow will now change in the correct direction in response to load. 

Figure 15.54b is a schematic of a feedforward controller applied for steam drum level control. If the flow rate of the makeup feedwater is equal to the steam usage, the drum level remains constant. One is tempted to conclude that the feedforward controller is aU that is needed for this application. Unfortunately, the measurements of the steam usage and the feedwater flow rate are not perfectly accurate. Even small errors in measured flow rates add up over time, leading to one of two undesirable extremes. The drum can till with water and put water into the steam system, or the liquid level can drop, exposing the boiler tubes, which can damage them. As a result, neither feedback nor feedforward are effective by themselves for this case. In general, feedforward-only controllers are susceptible to measurement errors and umneasured disturbances, and, as a result, some type of feedback correction is typically required. 

Condensate makeup to the steam drum is ratioed to the lo-psig steam flow rate from the steam drum. This ratio is then reset by the steam drum level controller. Pressure in the 50-psig steam header is controlled by adding 100-psig steam. 

Low steam drum level pinches reactor feed. 

Figure 22.4 Steam drum level indication malfunction. Water level in drum higher than external level indication.

---