Statutory bar

The provisional application can effectively give an applicant 2 years after a statutory bar (e.g., public use or sale of the invention) in which to decide whether to file a regular application. A statutory bar can be avoided if the provisional application is filed within 1 year of the statutory bar event (104). If the regular application claiming benefit of the provisional application is filed within 1 year of the provisional application, it is entitled to benefit of the provisional application s filingdate. Thus, the regular application could be filed up to 2 years after the otherwise disqualifying event. 

A barebones provisional application may be useful when it is necessary to prepare and file a provisional application as quickly as possible (e.g., to avoid an imminent statutory bar) even then, however, as complete a provisional application as time permits would still be preferred. Such a barebones provisional application might also be used to advantage in relatively simple mechanical inventions where "a picture may be worth a thousand words." To be effective in establishing a priority date, however, the barebones provisional application must still enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make or use the invention and must contain the best mode known to the inventors as of its filing date. 

An invention may also not be patentable under 102 if certain events (so-called statutory bars) occur more than 1 year before the patent application is filed in the PTO. The statutory bars are designed to encourage the inventor to file his or her patent application in a timely manner. For example, a written description of the invention, a public use, or offer of sale of the subject matter of the invention in the United States more than 1 year before the filing date of the application bars the invention from being patented. An inventor thus has a 1-year grace period after such a public disclosure in which to file a patent application in the United States. 

Where a building has been built or altered in accordance with the Buildings Regulations a Statutory Bar applies to the Fire Authority which prevents them from requiring additional structural or other work relating to means of escape prior to issuing a fire certificate. 

The torr is included in the table only to facilitate the transition from this familiar unit to the statutory units N m, mbar and bar. In future the pressure units tor, mm water column, mm mercury column (mm Hg), % vacuum, technical atmosphere (at), physicalatmosphene (atm), atmosphere absolute (ata), pressure above atmospheric and pressure below atmospheric may no longer be used. Reference is made to DIN 1314 in this context. 2) The unit Newton divided by square meters (N m ) is also designated as Pascal (Pa) 1 N m = 1 Pa. Newton divided by square meters or Pascal is the SI unit for the pressure of fluids. 3) 1 torr = 4/3 mbar fl torr = 1 mbar. ... 

First, the exposure rule states that the action accrues at the time of last exposure, even if the claimant s illness did not manifest until many years after the final exposure. Since typical statutory periods for commencement of tort claims run between 2 and 4 years, application of the exposure rule effectively bars many claimants who allege development of latent injuries. 

Third, the statutory discovery rule codifies the SOL period, which begins to run at the time of the discovery of the injury or when the injury should have been discovered through the exercise of reasonable diligence. Occasional statutes further provide that if the plaintiff has not discovered the cause of the illness or injury within a stated number of years, the claim will be barred. 

The annual world output of gold is about 1000 tons, the value of which in pounds sterling is placed at approximately 260 millions. From 90 to 95 per cent of this is absorbed in bars of statutory 400 oz. Troy weight for monetary purposes, international trade and exchange. The world s stock in hand of gold is believed to be worth some 4000 to 5000 million pounds sterling ... 

This Court faced a similar situation in Farmers Union v. WDAY, Inc., 360 U.S. 525, 79 S.Ct. 1302, 3 L.Ed.2d 1407 (1959). In WDAY, it held that 315(a) of the Federal Communications Act of 1934 barred a broadcasting station from removing defamatory statements contained in speeches broadcast by candidates for public office. It then considered a libel action that arose as a result of a speech made over the radio and television facilities of WDAY by a candidate for the 1956 senatorial race in North Dakota. It held that the statutory prohibition of censorship carried with it an immunity from liability for defamatory statements made by the speaker. To allow libel actions would sanction the unconscionable result of permitting civil and perhaps criminal liability to be imposed for the... 

Briscoe, S. (2004). Raising the bar can increased statutory penalties deter drink-drivers Accid. Anal. Prev., 36,919-929. 

Cepemich, D. (2010) Fighting for Asylum A Statutory Exception to Relevant Bars for Former Child Sokhers. Southern California Law Review 83(5) 1099-134. 

---