State vector x

In the design of state observers in section 8.4.3, it was assumed that the measurements y = Cx were noise free. In practice, this is not usually the case and therefore the observed state vector x may also be contaminated with noise. 

At this point we introduce the formal notation, which is commonly used in literature, and which is further used throughout this chapter. In the new notation we replace the parameter vector b in the calibration example by a vector x, which is called the state vector. In the multicomponent kinetic system the state vector x contains the concentrations of the compounds in the reaction mixture at a given time. Thus x is the vector which is estimated by the filter. The response of the measurement device, e.g., the absorbance at a given wavelength, is denoted by z. The absorbtivities at a given wavelength which relate the measured absorbance to the concentrations of the compounds in the mixture, or the design matrix in the calibration experiment (x in eq. (41.3)) are denoted by h. ... 

The only difference here is that it is further assumed that some or all of the components of the initial state vector x0 are unknown. Let the q-dimensional vector p (0 < q < ri) denote the unknown components of the vector x0. In this class of parameter estimation problems, the objective is to determine not only the parameter vector k but also the unknown vector p containing the unknown elements of the initial state vector x(to). 

Without any loss of generality, it has been assumed that the unknown initial states correspond to state variables that are placed as the first elements of the state vector x(t). Hence, the structure of the initial condition in Equation 6.41. 

The next step in this study is to test this control algorithm on the actual laboratory reactor. The major difficulty is the direct measurement of the state variables in the reactor (T, M, I, W). Proposed strategy is to measure total mols of polymer (T) with visible light absorption and monomer concentration (M) with IR absorption. Initiator concentration (I) can be monitored by titrating the n-butyl lithium with water and detecting the resultant butane gas in a thermal conductivity cell. Finally W can be obtained by refractive index measurements in conjuction with the other three measurements. Preliminary experiments indicate that this strategy will result in fast and accurate measurements of the state vector x. 

Furthermore, matrices F, C, and n0 may depend, in general, on a finitedimensional vector 6 that must be determined. The EKF approach for determining the unknown vector a involves extending the state vector x with the parameter 0 thus,... 

The dimensions of the state vector X and of the observation vector (exit vector) are N and M respectively. This short introduction is completed by assuming that Rk is positive (Rk>0). 

The problem considered here is the estimation of the state vector X (which contains the unknown parameters) from the observations of the vectors = [yo> yi.yk ] Because the collection of variables Y = (yoYi - -yk) jointly gaussian, we can estimate X by maximizing the likelihood of conditional probability distributions p(Xk/Yk), which are given by the values of conditional variables. Moreover, we can also search the estimate X, which minimizes the mean square error k = Xk — Xk. In both cases (maximum likelihood or least squares), the optimal estimate for the jointly gaussian variables is the conditional mean and the error in the estimate is the conventional covariance. 

A mass balance is an equation for each variable intermediate in the network, say x, that describes at a particular moment in time the rate of change in this variable, that is, dx/dt, in terms of the difference between the rates of all the reactions producing x and all the reactions consuming it. If we denote rates by v then we obtain for each of the intermediates, entries in the state vector x = x, ..., xj,..., Xm, the following mass balance ... 

Summarizing At the time point t t-i the optimum of the [quadratic objective function] Zk is sought. The resulting control [input] vector U k) depends on x k—l) and contains all control [input] vectors u%, uf+i,. .., u% which control the process optimally over the interval tk-i, T. Of these control [input] vectors, one implements the vector (which depends on x k — 1)) as input vector for the next interval [t -i, tj. At the next time point a new input vector M +i is determined. This is calculated from the objective function Z +i and is dependent on x k). Therefore, the vector Ui, which is implemented in the interval is dependent on the state vector x k — 1). Hence, the sought feedback law consists of the solution of a convex optimization problem at each time point (k = 1, 2,. .., N). (Translation by the author.)... 

The system dynamics equation defines the model for the propagation of the state vector X(k) (which comprises the best estimates of the n parameters describing the system state)... 

The algorithm consists of the five equations of Table 1. Equations (3) and (4) predict the state vector X and the error covariance matrix of the state parameters P on the base of the values estimated at the previous k-1 measuronart and prior to assimilating the new kth measurement. The n-n aror covariance matrix P is defined by... 

X is an n X 1 vector of state deviations from an operating point defined by the state vector, x, and the input vector, u,... 

In equation (1), variable LM represents a measurement of the presence of a hazard at the input of the stage, i.e. CPU of LM herein, whereas the output variable LM represents the measurement of this hazard at the output of the stage. The transfer function S(.) maps the input, LM , into the output, LM, depending on the values adopted by the vector of stage operational parameters, T, the control state vector x associated with critical parameters undertaken control fiom vector T, and by its corresponding monitoring state vector P. 

Parametric faults are called multiplicative because they contribute terms to the state space equations that are the product of one of the usually time constant matrices AA, AB, AC, AD with the state vector x(r) or the vector of known inputs (f), i.e. with a time-varying vector [10]. 

The state vector x of the faulty system model differs from the state vector x of the non-faulty system model with nominal parameters due to parametric faults. The same holds for the measured outputs y, i.e. x = x + Ax and y = y -b Ay. Substituting the decomposed vectors into (4.32a and 4.32b) yields... 

Xt. When F is unstable, it is necessary to characterize the distribution of the state vector X at a particular reference point (without loss of generality we refer to such point as point zero). This can be done, for instance, by providing a mean vector E[A o] and a covariance matrix So for the initial state Xq. Then, a recursive application of (10.1) yields Xt = F Xq+ and hence Dt = p- -GY j QF Vt-j- -GF Xo. Consider, for instance the ARIMA(0,1,1) model ... 

Thus, in this formulation, h is not a system state but a new state arises from (5.24). Hence define the system state-vector x as... 

The system s dynamic response variables such as displacements and velocities are contained in the state vector x n x 1). Physical quantities that exert excitations on the system (e. g. external forces and actuator forces) are collected in an input vector u p x 1), and measured quantities (sensor signals) in an output vector y(g x 1). For actively controlled adaptronic systems, the task is to generate a suitable input u t) from a given output y t) such that the system exhibits desirable dynamic behaviour. 

The equation of motion, written in terms of state variables, will also be useful. After introducing the following state vector x(f) = [q,(f), q,(f), q (f)fthefollowingstate equation could be written... 

Fig. 4.1. Splitting of the state vector X into the unperturbed part Xq (J>) and the deviation u...

Given this formulation (and assuming that the system is observable) it has been shown (Stanway (5)) that knowledge of the vector of observations over a suitable time span (0 < x < T) enables the correspond behaviour of the state vector X to be deduced. Since the state vector X contaTns the four damping terms, then the estimation of x automatically implies estimation of the linearised squeeze-film dynamics. 

For a multi-degree-of-freedom system, the evolutionary covariance submatrix of the state vectors, x.x., defining the modal responses, E (t) is given by Gasparlni (1979) as follows ... 

In the terms of the structure function, a (minimal) cut set can be interpreted by a special state vector, which is known as a Minimal) Cut Vector. According to the definition of a cut set, the system state for a state vector covered by a cut set is zero. Therefore, state vector x is a cut vector if x) = 0. 

---