Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Standard geometries

The apparent bypass can be estimated by assuming it is approximately equal to the water spHt, ie, the percentage of water in the feed that reports to the underflow. The water spHt has been found to foUow a straight-line relationship with the inverse of the feed water rate for cyclones having diameters greater than 7.5 cm and standard geometries. However, for cyclones of smaller diameters, the apparent bypass appears to be much greater than the water spht, and is typically proportional to the square root of the water spHt. [Pg.438]

Figure 1 The course of energy minimization of a DNA duplex with different choices of coordinates. The rate of convergence is monitored by the decrease of the RMSD from the final local minimum structure, which was very similar in all three cases, with the number of gradient calls. The RMSD was normalized by its initial value. CC, IC, and SG stand for Cartesian coordinates, 3N internal coordinates, and standard geometry, respectively. Figure 1 The course of energy minimization of a DNA duplex with different choices of coordinates. The rate of convergence is monitored by the decrease of the RMSD from the final local minimum structure, which was very similar in all three cases, with the number of gradient calls. The RMSD was normalized by its initial value. CC, IC, and SG stand for Cartesian coordinates, 3N internal coordinates, and standard geometry, respectively.
The last two problems have been realized only recently, and additional progress in these research directions may be expected in the near future. At present it is clear that with the standard geometry approximation all time step limitations below 10 fs can be overcome rather easily. This time step increase gives a substantial net increase in performance compared to conventional MD. The possibility of larger step sizes now looks problematic, although it has been demonstrated for small molecules. Larger steps should be possible, however, with constraints beyond the standard geometry approximation. [Pg.123]

In our last example we return to the issue of the possible damaging effects of the standard geometry constraints. Two long trajectories have been computed for a partially hydrated dodecamer DNA duplex of the previous example, first by using ICMD and second with Cartesian coordinate molecular dynamics without constraints [54]. Both trajectories started from the same initial conformation with RMSD of 2.6 A from the canonical B-DNA form. Figure 5 shows the time evolution of RMSD from the canonical A and B conformations. Each point in the figure corresponds to a 15 ps interval and shows an average RMSD value. We see that both trajectories approach the canonical B-DNA, while the RMSD... [Pg.128]

Standard Geometry describes a vessel and mixer design based on a fluid depth equal to vessel diameter and a top-entering impeller having a diameter equal to 1/3 of vessel diameter and located with a clearance of 1/3 of vessel diameter above the bottom of the vessel. [Pg.454]

From a flow pattern and power dissipation standpoint, a bottom entering shaft is equivalent. If shaft seal problems are handleable, bottom entry ean reduce the required shaft length in vessels which are designed with tall vapor spaces for foam disengagement, etc. The geometric parameters for a standard geometry tank shown in Figure 19 are defined as follows Z = T, D = T/3, B = T/12 to T/10, B,. = T/12, w = D/8 to D/5. [Pg.458]

Solution "Standard geometry" is appropriate for this application (see Figure 19). The vessel volume is 2 m The trial vessel diameter is computed as follows ... [Pg.466]

An important step is to validate the structure, that is, to compare features of the structure to features in known protein structures. This includes localized fit to density, hydrogen bonding patterns, divergence from standard geometry, and much more [12]. Such calculations can highlight where the model requires further improvement. [Pg.283]

For an ellipse with major axis 2a and minor axis 2b, it can be shown that (see any standard geometry text) ... [Pg.803]

Schafer, L., J. D. Ewbank, V. J. Klimkowski, K. Siam, and C. Van Alsenoy. 1986. predictions of Relative Structural Trends from Ab Initio Derived Standard Geometry Functions. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 135, 141-158. [Pg.157]

MO energies calculated by the CNDO/2 method using standard geometries. [Pg.11]


See other pages where Standard geometries is mentioned: [Pg.181]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.622]    [Pg.622]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.74]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.203 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info