Stability design space

Stability design space (SDS) Is part of the API release requirements, a well-imderstood space built through development knowledge, imderstand-ing of KSAs and verified by SLLAs that, allows confident shelf life assignment for a given API, independent of scale, site, process, and route. SDS lies within the QbD space. 

The process of formulation for any of the above is generically the same, beginning with some form of product specification and ending with one or more formulations that meet the requirements. Correct choice of additives or excipients is paramount in the provision of efficacy, stability, and safety. For instance, the excipients may be chemically or physically incompatible with the drug or they may exhibit batchwise variability to such an extent that at the extremes of their specification they may cause failure in achieving the desired drug release profile. In addition, some excipients, especially those that are hydroscopic, may be contraindicated if the formulation is to be manufactured in tropical countries. Flence formulators must work in a design space that is multidimensional in nature and virtually impossible to conceptualize. 

Relevant critical-to-quahty product attributes should be considered by the design space model (e.g., content uniformity, bioavailability, stability). 

In tlie previous section we showed tliat because tlie stmcture space is very sparse tliere have to be many sequences tliat map onto tlie countable number of basins in tlie stmcture space. The kinetics here shows tliat not all tlie sequences, even for highly designable stmctures, are kinetically competent. Consequently, the biological requirements of stability and speed of folding severely restrict tlie number of evolved sequences for a given fold. This very important result is schematically shown in figure C2.5.4. 

HETP for a 2-in. slotted metal ring in a condensate stabilizer is about 36 in. This is slightly more than a typical tray design, which would require 34 in. (1.4 trays X 24-in. tray spacing) for one theoretical plate or stage. 

In a trayed absorber the amine falls from one tray to the one below in the same manner as the liquid in a condensate stabilizer (Chapter 6, Figure 6-4). It flows across the tray and over a weir before flowing into the next downcomer. The gas bubbles up through the liquid and creates a froth that must be separated from the gas before it reaches the underside of the next tray. For preliminary design, a tray spacing of 24 in. and a minimum diameter capable of separating 150 to 200 micron droplets (using the equations developed in Volume 1 for gas capacity of a vertical separator) can be assumed. The size of packed towers must be obtained from manufacturer s published literature. 

In Fig. 1.1, the parameter space for transient and stable cavitation bubbles is shown in R0 (ambient bubble radius) - pa (acoustic amplitude) plane [15]. The ambient bubble radius is defined as the bubble radius when an acoustic wave (ultrasound) is absent. The acoustic amplitude is defined as the pressure amplitude of an acoustic wave (ultrasound). Here, transient and stable cavitation bubbles are defined by their shape stability. This is the result of numerical simulations of bubble pulsations. Above the thickest line, bubbles are those of transient cavitation. Below the thickest line, bubbles are those of stable cavitation. Near the left upper side, there is a region for bubbles of high-energy stable cavitation designated by Stable (strong nf0) . In the brackets, the type of acoustic cavitation noise is indicated. The acoustic cavitation noise is defined as acoustic emissions from... 

---