Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Spin-orbital generalized

The examination of the role of the two-electron term in the Hamiltonian shows that elements of the many-electron basis with occupied Kramers pairs of spin orbitals generally will have a larger energy than others and that the ground state configuration conforms with Hund s rule. Kramers pairs are related to the Racah seniority approximate quantum number. The rotationally invariant geminal creator... [Pg.48]

Since it is not possible to generate antisynnnetric combinations of products if the same spin orbital appears twice in each tenn, it follows that states which assign the same set of four quantum numbers twice cannot possibly satisfy the requirement P.j i = -ij/, so this statement of the exclusion principle is consistent with the more general symmetry requirement. An even more general statement of the exclusion principle, which can be regarded as an additional postulate of quantum mechanics, is... [Pg.30]

Introduction of the vibronic coupling (s / 0) causes removal of the above degeneracy and leads to the general vibronic-spin-orbit pattern presented in the central part of Figure 3. Each vibronic level is characterized by a particular K... [Pg.493]

The first theoretical handling of the weak R-T combined with the spin-orbit coupling was carried out by Pople [71]. It represents a generalization of the perturbative approaches by Renner and PL-H. The basis functions are assumed as products of (42) with the eigenfunctions of the spin operator conesponding to values E = 1/2. The spin-orbit contribution to the model Hamiltonian was taken in the phenomenological form (16). It was assumed that both interactions are small compared to the bending vibrational frequency and that both the... [Pg.509]

A determinant is the most convenient way to write down the permitted functional forms of a polv electronic wavefunction that satisfies the antisymmetry principle. In general, if we have electrons in spin orbitals Xi,X2, , Xn (where each spin orbital is the product of a spatial function and a spin function) then an acceptable form of the wavefunction is ... [Pg.59]

The anti symmetrized orbital produet A (l)i(l)2Cl)3 is represented by the short hand (1>1(1>2(1>3 I and is referred to as a Slater determinant. The origin of this notation ean be made elear by noting that (1/VN ) times the determinant of a matrix whose rows are labeled by the index i of the spin-orbital (jii and whose eolumns are labeled by the index j of the eleetron at rj is equal to the above funetion A (l)i(l)2Cl)3 = (1/V3 ) det(( )i (rj)). The general strueture of sueh Slater determinants is illustrated below ... [Pg.241]

First, try to draw resonance contributors for both ground state and triplet anthrone. Then display a spin density surface for the triplet state of anthrone. (Note that the spin density surface shows the location of both unpaired electrons, one of which may be in a 7t orbital and one of which may be in a o orbital.) Where are the two unpaired electrons Are they localized or delocalized Given that spin delocalization generally leads to stabilization, would you expect the triplet state of anthrone to be stable ... [Pg.261]

A more general way to treat systems having an odd number of electrons, and certain electronically excited states of other systems, is to let the individual HF orbitals become singly occupied, as in Figure 6.3. In standard HF theory, we constrain the wavefunction so that every HF orbital is doubly occupied. The idea of unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) theory is to allow the a and yS electrons to have different spatial wavefunctions. In the LCAO variant of UHF theory, we seek LCAO coefficients for the a spin and yS spin orbitals separately. These are determined from coupled matrix eigenvalue problems that are very similar to the closed-shell case. [Pg.120]

Spin-orbit coupling is a relativistic effect that is well reported in tables of atomic energy levels, and this gives a guide. Relativistic effects are generally thought to he negligible for first-row elements. [Pg.273]

Before proving this theorem, we will make some general remarks about the nature of the one-electron functions ipk(x) or spin orbitals. For the two values of the spin coordinate f — 1, such a function y)k(r, f) has two space components... [Pg.227]

This is the most general form of a spin orbital, but if the Hamiltonian does not contain the spin explicitly, it may be more convenient to try to introduce simplified spin orbitals which contain only one nonvanishing component and hence are of either pure a or character. Corresponding to the idea of the doubly occupied orbitals, the spin orbitals are often constructed in pairs simply by multiplying the same orbital tp(r) with a and ft, respectively. [Pg.228]

This is the most general expression obtained from a set of natural spin orbitals written in spinor form as... [Pg.131]

Orbitally degenerate grormd states, in general, cannot be treated in the spin-Hamiltonian approach. In this case, SOC has to be evaluated explicitly on an extended basis of spin-orbit functions. However, in coordination chemistry and bioinorganic chemistry, this is only of marginal importance, because the metal centers of... [Pg.131]

Apart from d- and 4f-based magnetic systems, the physical properties of actinides can be classified to be intermediate between the lanthanides and d-electron metals. 5f-electron states form bands whose width lies in between those of d- and 4f-electron states. On the other hand, the spin-orbit interaction increases as a function of atomic number and is the largest for actinides. Therefore, one can see direct similarity between the light actinides, up to plutonium, and the transition metals on one side, and the heavy actinides and 4f elements on the other side. In general, the presence or absence of magnetic order in actinides depends on the shortest distance between 5f atoms (Hill limit). [Pg.241]

Such a "general form of wave function is easily written explicitly for each set of values of N, S, and MS- Any appropriate form of approximate wave functions, like determinantal functions composed of one-electron functions ( molecular spin orbitals ), the "bond eigenfunctions" used in the valence bond approach, and so on, is shown to fulfil this requirement. [Pg.6]


See other pages where Spin-orbital generalized is mentioned: [Pg.159]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.1143]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.728]    [Pg.729]    [Pg.1092]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.434]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.173 ]




SEARCH



Natural general spin orbitals

Natural general spin orbitals theory

Orbits general

Spin orbitals generalized normal ordering

© 2024 chempedia.info