Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Spin one-half

Since electrons, protons, and neutrons are the fundamental constituents of atoms and molecules and all three elementary particles have spin one-half, the case 5 = I is the most important for studying chemical systems. For s = there are only two eigenfunctions,, d) and j, — ). For convenience, the state s =, ms = is often called spin up and the ket, is written as t) or as a). Likewise, the state s =, m = is called spin down with the ket j, — ) often expressed as J,) or /3). Equation (7.6) gives [Pg.198]

The most general spin state %) for a particle with 5 = is a linear combination of I a) and (i) [Pg.198]

The ket x) may also be expressed as a column matrix, known as a spinor [Pg.199]

Equations (7.16) illustrate the behavior of and S- as ladder operators. The operator S+ raises the state /3) to state ja), but cannot raise a) any further, while lowers a) to /3), but cannot lower y3). From equations (7.7) and (7.16), we obtain the additional relations [Pg.199]

We next introduce three operators oy, which satisfy the relations [Pg.199]


Chapters 7 and 8 discuss spin and identical particles, respectively, and each chapter introduces an additional postulate. The treatment in Chapter 7 is limited to spin one-half particles, since these are the particles of interest to chemists. Chapter 8 provides the link between quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics. To emphasize that link, the ffee-electron gas and Bose-Einstein condensation are discussed. Chapter 9 presents two approximation procedures, the variation method and perturbation theory, while Chapter 10 treats molecular structure and nuclear motion. [Pg.362]

For the bound electron, calculation of the relativistic corrections should also take into account the contributions due to its spin one half. Account for the spin one half does not change the fundamental fact that all relativistic... [Pg.3]

In the Breit Hamiltonian in (3.2) we have omitted all terms which depend on spin variables of the heavy particle. As a result the corrections to the energy levels in (3.4) do not depend on the relative orientation of the spins of the heavy and light particles (in other words they do not describe hyperfine splitting). Moreover, almost all contributions in (3.4) are independent not only of the mutual orientation of spins of the heavy and light particles but also of the magnitude of the spin of the heavy particle. The only exception is the small contribution proportional to the term Sio, called the Darwin-Foldy contribution. This term arises in the matrix element of the Breit Hamiltonian only for the spin one-half nucleus and should be omitted for spinless or spin one nuclei. This contribution combines naturally with the nuclear size correction, and we postpone its discussion to Subsect. 6.1.2 dealing with the nuclear size contribution. [Pg.21]

The expression for the Fermi energy in (8.2), besides the trivial substitutions similar to the ones in the case of hydrogen, should also be multiplied by an additional factor 3/4 corresponding to the transition from a spin one half nucleus in the case of hydrogen and muonium to the spin one nucleus in the case of deuterium. The final expression for the deuterium Fermi energy has the form... [Pg.251]

CP/MAS NMR, with C-13, P-31, and a variety of spin-one-half nuclides can yield high-resolution NMR data that provide badly needed bridges between the liquid and solid states. These bridges can be used to estimate the extent to which diffraction-determined structural results on crystalline solids can be extrapolated into the liquid state. A substantial effort in this direction is underway in our laboratory. The potential for CP/MAS NMR in characterizing polymer-supported catalysts is also evident. [Pg.402]

A spin ladder is an array of coupled spin chains. The horizontal chains are called the legs, the vertical ones, rungs. In the case of spin one-half antiferromagnet spin-ladders, these systems show a. remarkable behaviour in function of the number of leg there is a gap in the excitation spectrum of even-leg ladders and, on the contrary, no gap in the excitation spectrum of odd-leg ladders. In terms of correlation lengths, this means that there is short (long) -range spin correlation in even (odd) -legladder (see [24] for a review). [Pg.171]

We start by acknowledging that our goals are modest as we confront such a vast field as multinuclear NMR. In Section 3.7, we have seen the impact of other nuclei that possess a magnetic moment (especially those with spin one-half) on proton spectra. We will briefly examine the NMR spectrometry of four spin one-half nuclei, which were selected for their historic importance in organic chemistry (and related natural products and pharmaceutical fields), biochemistry, and polymer chemistry. These four nuclei, l5N, 19F, 29Si, and 31P, are presented with a few simple examples and a brief consideration of important experimental factors and limitations. [Pg.316]

Development of nuclear polarizations in the spin-correlated pairs or biradicals Because Equation (6) couples the nuclear spin motion and the electron-spin motion, not only the electron-spin state of each pair oscillates but also the nuclear spin state. Over the ensemble, however, the oscillation is not symmetrical because flip-flop fransifions are only possible for one-half of the pairs. Consider, for example, an ensemble of biradicals with one proton, and let the biradicals be bom in state F i). Taking into accoimt also the nuclear spin, one-half of fhe biradicals are fhus born in state T ia) and the other half in state T ijS). The latter cannot undergo flip-flop transitions to the singlet state, so have to remain in the state they were bom. The others oscillate between T ia) and I SjS). If a fracfion n of fhem has reached the singlet state, the total number of biradicals wifh nuclear spin a) is l-n)/2, and the total number of biradicals wifh spin jS) is n/2+1/2. The difference between the number of molecules wifh nuclear spin a) and jS) is fhus -n, in other words the system oscillates between zero polarization (n = 0) and complete polarization of one sort n = -1,... [Pg.88]

The definition of the convolution product is quite clear like the one of the Fourier transforms, it has a given mathematical expression. An important property of convolution is that the product of two functions corresponds to the Fourier transform of the convolution product of their Fourier transforms. In the context of high-resolution FT-NMR, a typical example is the signal of a given spin coupled to a spin one half. In the time domain, the relaxation gives rise to an exponential decay multiplied by a cosine function under the influence of the coupling. In the frequency domain, the first corresponds to a Lorentzian lineshape while the second corresponds to a doublet of delta functions. The spectrum of such a spin has a lineshape which is the result of the convolution product of the Lorentzian with the doublet of delta functions. In contrast, the word deconvolution is not always used with equal clarity. Sometimes it is meant as the strict reverse process of convolution, in which case it corresponds to a division in the reciprocal domain, but it is often used more loosely to mean simplification. This lack of clarity is due to the diversity of solutions offered to the problem of deconvolution, depending on the function to be deconvoluted, the quality one wishes to obtain, and other parameters. [Pg.158]


See other pages where Spin one-half is mentioned: [Pg.198]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.715]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.2475]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.2474]    [Pg.127]   


SEARCH



One Spin

© 2024 chempedia.info