Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Spheres, close packing

Many crystal stmctures can be considered as consisting of spheres closely packed so that the voids are more or less filled by other atoms. Each textbook makes use of this fact to demonstrate crystal stmctures for beginners. This principle can be expanded to provide a concept in which any crystal stmcture is considered as built up from close-packed layers stacked together. A program exists for finding such layers and the voids in them. Simpler descriptions of complex crystal stmctures also result from packing of polyhedra or other building blocks. " ... [Pg.1333]

Use Eq. Ill-15 and related equations to calculate and the energy of vaporization of argon. Take m to be eo of Problem 6, and assume argon to have a close-packed structure of spheres 3.4 A in diameter. [Pg.92]

Figure Bl.21.1. Atomic hard-ball models of low-Miller-index bulk-temiinated surfaces of simple metals with face-centred close-packed (fee), hexagonal close-packed (licp) and body-centred cubic (bcc) lattices (a) fee (lll)-(l X 1) (b)fcc(lO -(l X l) (c)fcc(110)-(l X 1) (d)hcp(0001)-(l x 1) (e) hcp(l0-10)-(l X 1), usually written as hcp(l010)-(l x 1) (f) bcc(l 10)-(1 x ]) (g) bcc(100)-(l x 1) and (li) bcc(l 11)-(1 x 1). The atomic spheres are drawn with radii that are smaller than touching-sphere radii, in order to give better depth views. The arrows are unit cell vectors. These figures were produced by the software program BALSAC [35]-... Figure Bl.21.1. Atomic hard-ball models of low-Miller-index bulk-temiinated surfaces of simple metals with face-centred close-packed (fee), hexagonal close-packed (licp) and body-centred cubic (bcc) lattices (a) fee (lll)-(l X 1) (b)fcc(lO -(l X l) (c)fcc(110)-(l X 1) (d)hcp(0001)-(l x 1) (e) hcp(l0-10)-(l X 1), usually written as hcp(l010)-(l x 1) (f) bcc(l 10)-(1 x ]) (g) bcc(100)-(l x 1) and (li) bcc(l 11)-(1 x 1). The atomic spheres are drawn with radii that are smaller than touching-sphere radii, in order to give better depth views. The arrows are unit cell vectors. These figures were produced by the software program BALSAC [35]-...
While not overcrowded, the polyethylene structure uses space with admirable efficiency, the atoms filling the available space with 73% efficiency. For contrast, recall that close-packed spheres fill space with 74% efficiency, so polyethylene does about as well as is possible in its utilization of space. [Pg.236]

DpopE related to SpQpp, which is in turn related to the closeness of packing of the powder. The number of particles adjacent to a given particle is represented by The maximum packing density for monosize spheres occurs at hexagonal close packing, where = 12 and = 0.2595 for... [Pg.542]

Fig. 5.1. The close packing of hard-sphere atoms. The ABC slacking gives the face-centred cubic (f.c.c.) structure. Fig. 5.1. The close packing of hard-sphere atoms. The ABC slacking gives the face-centred cubic (f.c.c.) structure.
Fig. 5.2. Close packing of hard-sphere atoms - an alternative arrangement, giving the hexagonal close-packed (h.c.p.) structure. Fig. 5.2. Close packing of hard-sphere atoms - an alternative arrangement, giving the hexagonal close-packed (h.c.p.) structure.
Although Eqs. (33), (34), and especially (35), are useful they have a problem. They all predict that the hard sphere system is a fluid until = 1. This is beyond close packing and quite impossible. In fact, hard spheres undergo a first order phase transition to a solid phase at around pd 0.9. This has been estabhshed by simulations [3-5]. To a point, the BGY approximation has the advantage here. As is seen in Fig. 1, the BGY equation does predict that dp dp)j = 0 at high densities. However, the location of the transition is quite wrong. Another problem with the PY theory is that it can lead to negative values of g(r). This is a result of the linearization of y(r) - 1 that... [Pg.145]

In the CHS model only nearest neighbors interact, and the interactions between amphiphiles in the simplest version of the model are neglected. In the case of the oil-water symmetry only two parameters characterize the interactions b is the strength of the water-water (oil-oil) interaction, and c describes the interaction between water (oil) and an amphiphile. The interaction between amphiphiles and ordinary molecules is proportional to a scalar product between the orientation of the amphiphile and the distance between the particles. In Ref. 15 the CHS model is generalized, and M orientations of amphiphiles uniformly distributed over the sphere are considered, with M oo. Every lattice site is occupied either by an oil, water, or surfactant particle in an orientation ujf, there are thus 2 + M microscopic states at every lattice site. The microscopic density of the state i is p.(r) = 1(0) if the site r is (is not) occupied by the state i. We denote the sum and the difference of microscopic oil and water densities by and 2 respectively and the density of surfactant at a point r and an orientation by p (r) = p r,U(). The microscopic densities assume the values = 1,0, = 1,0 and 2 = ill 0- In close-packing case the total density of surfactant ps(r) is related to by p = Ylf Pi = 1 - i i. The Hamiltonian of this model has the following form [15]... [Pg.721]

FIGURE 22.6 Two types of interstitial holes between layers of closed-packed spheres. [Pg.603]

FIGURE 5.24 A close-packed structure can be built up in stages. The first layer (A) is laid down with minimum waste of space, and the second layer (B) lies in the dips—the depressions—between the spheres of the first layer. Each sphere is touching six other spheres in its layer, as well as three in the layer below and three in the layer above. [Pg.316]

To see how to stack identical spheres together to give a close-packed structure, look at Fig. 5.24. In the first layer (A) each sphere lies at the center of a hexagon of other spheres. The spheres of the second (upper) layer (B) lie in the dips of the first layer. The third layer of spheres will lie in the dips of the second layer, with the pattern repeating over and over again. [Pg.316]


See other pages where Spheres, close packing is mentioned: [Pg.158]    [Pg.791]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.1366]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.3721]    [Pg.2175]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.791]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.1366]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.3721]    [Pg.2175]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.2210]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.753]    [Pg.760]    [Pg.602]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.316]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.84 ]




SEARCH



Close packing

Close-packed spheres

Closed packing

Packed spheres

Sphere packing

© 2024 chempedia.info