Sphere calculations Scattering cross

Relative measurements are considerably easier to make and are the type most commonly reported. However, absolute measurements are of importance, for example, in comparing measured scattering cross sections of nonspherical particles with calculations for equivalent spheres. Note that absolute as we are using the term here means that scattering is not normalized to some arbitrary reference angle it does not mean that absolute irradiances are measured, as with calibrated detectors. In both relative and absolute measurements, it is relative (i.e., dimensionless) irradiances that are determined. 

Calibration is invariably based on spheres, which means that an instrument can be used with confidence only for such particles. Of course, a response will duly be recorded if a nonspherical particle passes through the scattering volume. But what is the meaning of the equivalent radius corresponding to that response Is it the radius of a sphere of equal cross-sectional area Or equal surface area Or equal volume Or perhaps equal mean chord length Answers to these questions depend on the particular instrument and nonspherical particle comprehensive answers do not come easily because it is difficult to do calculations for nonspherical particles, even those of regular shape. 

To estimate its scattering cross section an electron is considered as a charge e uniformly spread over a spherical surface of radius R. The energy stored in such a system, which constitutes an isolated conducting sphere, is calculated by simple electrostatics [95] as E = e2/Sitc0R and equated with the rest energy of an electron of mass me to define the classical radius of the electron ... 

To examine the role of the LDOS modification near a metal nanobody and to look for a rationale for single molecule detection by means of SERS, Raman scattering cross-sections have been calculated for a hypothetical molecule with polarizability 10 placed in a close vicinity near a silver prolate spheroid with the length of 80 nm and diameter of 50 nm and near a silver spherical particle with the same volume. Polarization of incident light has been chosen so as the electric field vector is parallel to the axis connecting a molecule and the center of the silver particle. Maximal enhancement has been found to occur for molecule dipole moment oriented along electric field vector of Incident light. The position of maximal values of Raman cross-section is approximately by the position of maximal absolute value of nanoparticle s polarizability. For selected silver nanoparticles it corresponds to 83.5 nm and 347.8 nm for spheroid, and 354.9 nm for sphere. To account for local incident field enhancement factor the approach described by M. Stockman in [4] has been applied. To account for the local density of states enhancement factor, the approach used for calculation of a radiative decay rate of an excited atom near a metal body [9] was used. We... 

The absorption coefficient is a macroscopic property characteristic of the material of the sphere. It depends not only upon the absorption cross sections of the constituent atoms and upon their number per cubic centimeter but also upon their scattering cross sections. From the calculated absorption coeflBcient for thermal neutrons and the measurements of resonance absorption already reported for UaOs and in progress for uranium metal and compressed UsOg, it is the intention to deduce the optimum dimensions for the typical cell in the proposed lattice. 

Since, the size of the scattereis is much smaller than the scattered wavelength, the Rayleigh scattering formalism should be used. In this approach, the losses due to scattering are sc(A) = p.a JX), where p is the density of scatterers and is the wavelength dependent scattering cross section (Van de Hulst, 1981). For the sake of simphcity we consider the scatterer to be a dielectric sphere of radius r. Thus, can be calculated according to the equation (Wu et al., 2004) ... 

In vivo light absorption spectra (400-700 nm) were recorded with a Varian-Cary spectrophotometer equipped with an integrating sphere. Samples were taken to an approximate optical density of 0.1. Data were corrected for scattering by subtracting a baseline value as measured at 725 nm. The spectrally averaged, chlorophyll a specific absorption cross section (aph, m2 mg Chi a-1) was calculated as follows ... 

The porosity (1 — < ) is calculated from eq. 4 by using Ip and the value at the plateau of the scattering curve as the cross section for q —> 0. In addition, for small scattering vectors qR < 2 the Guinier approximation S qR < 2) = exp(—[7] was fitted, assuming homogeneous spheres with radius R . This was done in order to check whether this simple approximation is useful for an estimate of the mean micropore radii without assuming a pore size distribution. With the third fit parameter Xp/rn and eq. 2 the mean specific number density Np/rn of micropores with radius Rp is known as well as from... 

The possibility of a critical mass is anchored in the fact that the surface area of a sphere increases more slowly with increasing radius than does the volume (as nearly p- to r ). At some particular volume, depending on the density of the material and on its cross sections for scattering, capture and fission, more neutrons should find nuclei to fission than find surface to escape from that volume is then the critical mass. Estimating the several cross sections of natural uranium, Francis Perrin put its critical mass at forty-four tons. A tamper around the uranium of iron or lead to bounce back neutrons might reduce the requirement, Perrin calculated, to only thirteen tons. 

Figure 4.8 Comparison of quantal, solid curve, vs. classical, dashed, calculation of l 9), on a logarithmic scale, for the same realistic potential at the same collision energy. The classical differential cross-section diverges at e = 0 and at the rainbow angle while the oscillatory quantal cross-section is everywhere finite. In the backward direction, where there is only one classical trajectory, there is close agreement between the classical and quantal results. The backward scattering results from low b collisions, and these sample the inner repulsive core of the potential. The backward angular distribution is therefore hard-sphere-like, see Eq. (4.11).

---