Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Specific surfaces differences between

P.O.5 is one of the most significant organic pigments. Two product lines with different particle sizes are available which differ considerably in their coloristic properties. The varieties with coarser particle sizes and specific surface areas between ca. 10 and 12 m2/g are much more reddish and duller than the types with somewhat finer particle sizes and specific surface areas between 15 and 25 m2/g. [Pg.276]

Three LaCoOs samples (1,11, and 111) with different specific surface areas were prepared by reactive grinding. In the case of LaCoOs (1), only one step of grinding was performed. This step allowed us to obtain a erystalline LaCoOs phase. LaCoOs (11) and LaCoOs (111) were prepared in two grinding steps a first step to obtain perovskite crystallization and a second step with additive to enhanee speeific surface area. The obtained compounds (perovskite + additive) were washed repeatedly (with water or solvent) to free samples from any traee of additive. The physical properties of the three catalysts are presented in Table 10. LaCoOs (1) was designed to present a very low specific surface area for comparison purposes. NaCl used as the additive in the case of LaCoOs (11) led to a lower surface area than ZnO used for LaCoOs (111), even if the crystallite size calculated with the Sherrer equation led to similar values for the three catalysts. The three catalysts prepared were perovskites having specific surface areas between 4.2, 10.9 and 17.2 m /g after calcination at 550 °C. A second milling step was performed in the presence of an additive, yielding an enhanced specific surface area. [Pg.42]

Ideally, hydroxyapatite has the formula mentioned above. The synthetic material usually contains fewer than 10 Ca-ions and more than 2 OH-ions per crystal unit. Important differences in crystal structure, composition and specific surface exist between synthetic and biologic apatite. These differences result from the processing method of the raw materials and the synthetic method used. [Pg.271]

Crystallographic specificity marked difference between crystal planes independent of surface geometry... [Pg.45]

Comments The smface area of the powder or pellet is the sum of the surface area of primary particles. The value depends on the density of the material. The value of the specific surface area is quite high (Fig. 14.3), because chlorides are less dense materials. Be carefiil to compare the specific surface area between different materials. [Pg.517]

Specific Surface. The total surface area of 1 g of powder measured ia cm /g is called its specific surface. The specific surface area is an excellent iadicator for the conditions under which a reaction is initiated and also for the rate of the reaction. It correlates in general with the average particle size. The great difference in surface area between 6-p.m reduced iron powder and 7-p.m carbonyl iron powder (Table 3) cannot be explained in terms of particle size, but mainly by the difference between the very inregular-shaped reduced and the spherical carbonyl iron powders. [Pg.181]

The characteristics of a powder that determine its apparent density are rather complex, but some general statements with respect to powder variables and their effect on the density of the loose powder can be made. (/) The smaller the particles, the greater the specific surface area of the powder. This increases the friction between the particles and lowers the apparent density but enhances the rate of sintering. (2) Powders having very irregular-shaped particles are usually characterized by a lower apparent density than more regular or spherical ones. This is shown in Table 4 for three different types of copper powders having identical particle size distribution but different particle shape. These data illustrate the decisive influence of particle shape on apparent density. (J) In any mixture of coarse and fine powder particles, an optimum mixture results in maximum apparent density. This optimum mixture is reached when the fine particles fill the voids between the coarse particles. [Pg.181]

The difference between the specific surface areas of materials treated by the wet or dry method can also be explained by the rewelding mechanism. The surface area of wet milled powders continuously increases during milling, while extended dry milling causes a decrease in surface area. [Pg.261]

According to the concepts, given in the paper [7], a significant difference between the values of yield stress of equiconcentrated dispersions of mono- and polydisperse polymers and the effect of molecular weight of monodisperse polymers on the value of yield stress is connected with the specific adsorption on the surface of filler particles of shorter molecules, so that for polydisperse polymers (irrespective of their average molecular weight) this is the layer of the same molecules. At the same time, upon a transition to a number of monodisperse polymers, properties of the adsorption layer become different. [Pg.79]

The specific surface being a gauge of the fineness of a powder, comparison of the result for M-10 and M-20 in Table 10 shows that the Turbidimeter yielded analyses which were consistent with the burning time data, that is, M-10 is a finer powder than M-20. The Micromero-graph showed a smaller difference between these two lots. The Coulter Counter gave results which were inconsistent with the burning times. It... [Pg.523]

Suppose a mass M of fluid situated at a distance from the surface to be moving with a velocity us in the Y-direction. If this element moves to the surface where the velocity is zero, it will give up its momentum M , in time t, say. If the temperature difference between the element and the surface is 0S and Cp is the specific heat of the fluid, the heat transferred to the surface will be M Cp9s. If the surface is of area A, the rate of heat transfer is given by ... [Pg.721]

In this table the parameters are defined as follows Bo is the boiling number, d i is the hydraulic diameter, / is the friction factor, h is the local heat transfer coefficient, k is the thermal conductivity, Nu is the Nusselt number, Pr is the Prandtl number, q is the heat flux, v is the specific volume, X is the Martinelli parameter, Xvt is the Martinelli parameter for laminar liquid-turbulent vapor flow, Xw is the Martinelli parameter for laminar liquid-laminar vapor flow, Xq is thermodynamic equilibrium quality, z is the streamwise coordinate, fi is the viscosity, p is the density, <7 is the surface tension the subscripts are L for saturated fluid, LG for property difference between saturated vapor and saturated liquid, G for saturated vapor, sp for singlephase, and tp for two-phase. [Pg.304]

The surface actlve/surface inactive difference between p-polarlsed/ s-polarised radiation has enabled an alternative modulation technique, polarisation modulation, to be developed (15,16). In electrochemical applications, it allows surface specificity to be achieved whilst working at fixed potential and without electrochemical modulation of the interface. It can be implemented either on EMIRS or on SNIFTIRS spectrometers and can be very valuable in dealing with electrochemically irreversible systems however, the achievable sensitivity falls well short of that obtained with electrochemical modulation. It should also be noted that its "surface specificity" is not truly surface but extends out into the electrolyte with decreasing specificity to about half a wavelength. [Pg.552]


See other pages where Specific surfaces differences between is mentioned: [Pg.225]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.751]    [Pg.769]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.802]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.670]    [Pg.602]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.1783]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.1026]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.430]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.18 ]




SEARCH



Differences between

Specific surface

Surface specificity

Surface specifity

© 2024 chempedia.info