Spatial linearity

FIGURE 27.8 Spatial linearity comection. Residual positioning errors are corrected by imaging a precision hole phantom. A collection factor table is generated with the appropriate x and y offsets to reposition events to their correct location. The application of spatial linearity confection has a profound effect on image uniformity. 

FIGURE 27,9 Uniformity correction. Nonuniformilies in the field that remain after spatial linearity correction are corrected from the acqnisition of a high count reference flood image. In many cameras, the field uniformity degrades when the energy window is not centered on the photopeak. 

G(t) Ume-dependent spatially linear magnetic field gradient... 

Among the most critical components of an imaging system are the pulsed field gradients used to encode the images. Here, the characteristics that contribute to high quality images are the spatial linearity of the induced gradient pulses over the volume of interest... 

In a recent measurement, in fact, we have verified that both F xl and 3 x3 LaBr3 Ce deteetors do not have spatial linearity nor resolution in the case of 140 keV ineident gamma-rays. 

This approach is more close to X-ray stereo imaging and caimot reach enough depth resolution. There are also several systems with linear movement (1-dimensional) through the conical beam [5] as shown in Fig.4. In this case usable depth and spatial resolution can be achieved for specifically oriented parts of the object only. 

A linear stability analysis of (A3.3.57) can provide some insight into the structure of solutions to model B. The linear approximation to (A3.3.57) can be easily solved by taking a spatial Fourier transfomi. The result for the Ml Fourier mode is... 

The polarization P is given in tenns of E by the constitutive relation of the material. For the present discussion, we assume that the polarization P r) depends only on the field E evaluated at the same position r. This is the so-called dipole approximation. In later discussions, however, we will consider, in some specific cases, the contribution of a polarization that has a non-local spatial dependence on the optical field. Once we have augmented the system of equation B 1.5.16. equation B 1.5.17. equation B 1.5.18. equation B 1.5.19 and equation B 1.5.20 with the constitutive relation for the dependence of Pon E, we may solve for the radiation fields. This relation is generally characterized tlirough the use of linear and nonlinear susceptibility tensors, the subject to which we now turn. 

In most of the connnonly used ab initio quantum chemical methods [26], one fonns a set of configurations by placing N electrons into spin orbitals in a maimer that produces the spatial, spin and angular momentum syimnetry of the electronic state of interest. The correct wavefimction T is then written as a linear combination of tire mean-field configuration fimctions qj = example, to describe the... 

Figure C 1.4.7. Spatial variation of the polarization from tire field resulting from two counteriDropagating, circularly polarized fields witli equal amplitude but polarized in opposite senses. Note tliat tire polarization remains linear but tliat tire axis rotates in tire x-y plane witli a helical pitch along tire z axis of lengtli X.

Until now we have implicitly assumed that our problem is formulated in a space-fixed coordinate system. However, electronic wave functions are naturally expressed in the system bound to the molecule otherwise they generally also depend on the rotational coordinate 4>. (This is not the case for E electronic states, for which the wave functions are invariant with respect to (j> ) The eigenfunctions of the electronic Hamiltonian, v / and v , computed in the framework of the BO approximation ( adiabatic electronic wave functions) for two electronic states into which a spatially degenerate state of linear molecule splits upon bending. 

The expressions (75) and (77) can he used to extract the parameters ki, k2, ki2, s l, s 2, and (2 from the mean adiabatic potential and the difference of the adiabatic potentials for two components of the electronic state spatially degenerate at linear molecular geomehy. 

We restrict ourselves again to symmetric tetraatomic molecules (ABBA) with linear eqnilibrium geometi7. After integrating over electronic spatial and spin coordinates we obtain for A elecbonic states in the lowest order (quartic) approximation the effective model Hamiltonian H — Hq+ H, which zeroth-order part is given by Eq. (A.4) and the perturbative part of it of the form... 

For molecules with an even number of electrons, the spin function has only single-valued representations just as the spatial wave function. For these molecules, any degenerate spin-orbit state is unstable in the symmetric conformation since there is always a nontotally symmetric normal coordinate along which the potential energy depends linearly. For example, for an - state of a C3 molecule, the spin function has species da and E that upon... 

Triple bonds are formed by the sharing of three pairs of electrons to form a a and two n bonds. Spatially these three bonds behave as a single bond. Consequently acetylene (ethyne) C2H2 has the linear configuration often represented as H—C=C—H. 

The solution to this problem is to use more than one basis function of each type some of them compact and others diffuse, Linear combinations of basis Functions of the same type can then produce MOs with spatial extents between the limits set by the most compact and the most diffuse basis functions. Such basis sets arc known as double is the usual symbol for the exponent of the basis function, which determines its spatial extent) if all orbitals arc split into two components, or split ualence if only the valence orbitals arc split. A typical early split valence basis set was known as 6-31G 124], This nomenclature means that the core (non-valence) orbitals are represented by six Gaussian functions and the valence AOs by two sets of three (compact) and one (more diffuse) Gaussian functions. 

The described method can generate a first-order backward or a first-order forward difference scheme depending whether 0 = 0 or 0 = 1 is used. For 9 = 0.5, the method yields a second order accurate central difference scheme, however, other considerations such as the stability of numerical calculations should be taken into account. Stability analysis for this class of time stepping methods can only be carried out for simple cases where the coefficient matrix in Equation (2.106) is symmetric and positive-definite (i.e. self-adjoint problems Zienkiewicz and Taylor, 1994). Obviously, this will not be the case in most types of engineering flow problems. In practice, therefore, selection of appropriate values of 6 and time increment At is usually based on trial and error. Factors such as the nature of non-linearity of physical parameters and the type of elements used in the spatial discretization usually influence the selection of the values of 0 and At in a problem. 

In these eases, one says that a linear variational ealeulation is being performed. The set of funetions Oj are usually eonstrueted to obey all of the boundary eonditions that the exaet state E obeys, to be funetions of the the same eoordinates as E, and to be of the same spatial and spin symmetry as E. Beyond these eonditions, the Oj are nothing more than members of a set of funetions that are eonvenient to deal with (e.g., eonvenient to evaluate Hamiltonian matrix elements I>i H j>) and that ean, in prineiple, be made eomplete if more and more sueh funetions are ineluded. 

---