Space parity violation

After discovery of the combined charge and space parity violation, or CP-violation, in iT°-meson decay [7], the search for the electric dipole moments (EDMs) of elementary particles has become one of the most fundamental problems in physics [6, 8, 9, 10, 1]. A permanent EDM is induced by the weak interaction that breaks both the space symmetry inversion and time-reversal invariance [11]. Considerable experimental effort has been invested in probing for atomic EDMs induced by EDMs of the proton, neutron and electron, and by P,T-odd interactions between them. The best available restriction for the electron EDM, de, was obtained in the atomic T1 experiment [12], which established an upper limit of de < 1.6 X 10 e-cm, where e is the charge of the electron. The benchmark upper limit on a nuclear EDM is obtained in atomic experiment on i99Hg [13], ]dHgl < 2.1 X 10 e-cm, from which the best restriction on the proton EDM, dp < 5.4 x 10 " e-cm, was also recently obtained by Dmitriev Sen kov [14] (the previous upper limit on the proton EDM was obtained in the TIE experiment, see below). 

The most common form of TOT clathrate crystallises as discrete C2 symmetric cavities in the chiral space group 1, implying that the (—)-(M) and (+)-(/") forms separate spontaneously as crystallisation occurs. This property of TOT has been used in an ambitious model experiment designed to test the theory that the parity-violating energy difference (the violation of parity or symmetry in elementary particles), with autocatalytic amplification (in the case of TOT during crystallisation) is responsible for the observed chirality of modern biomolecules. The experiment did not find any evidence to support the theory, with equal amounts of each enantiomeric crystal being isolated.26... 

We can immediately identify two parity conserving terms, which arise from the scalar products of the two vectorial currents with the coupling coefficients Qy, Qy on the one hand and of the two axial currents with coupling coefficients 9, 9 on the other hand. In addition, we obtain two parity violating contributions from the two axial current-vectorial current couplings, which are often abbreviated as Vf Af and A/,V/j. Each of these terms has a time-like and a space-like component. 

Since the one-component approaches employ the efi ective Hamiltonian (113) or various further approximations to it, the expectation value of this Hamiltonian for a system in a closed shell singlet state vanishes. This is due to the scalar product between either the spin and the momentum operator of the electron or the scalar product of the electron momentum with the nuclear spin. In the absence of a coupling mechanism between spin and coordinate space, the scalar product must therefore vanish. For the parity violating energy difference between enantiomers the main coupling contribution is expected to be due to spin-orbit coupling. The corresponding... 

After the discovery of parity violation the CP symmetry, i.e., the invariance of the physical laws against the simultaneous transformation of charge and space reflection, was still assumed to be exact. However, in 1964 Cronin and Fitch (Nobel Prize 1980) discovered (Christenson et al. 1964) that the weak interaction violates that as well, although this violation is tiny, not maximal, like that of the P invariance. CP violation makes it possible to differentiate between a world and an antiworld and may be related to the matter - antimatter asymmetry. 

Note that since under a space reflection R L the fact that ur ni can only arise from the parity-violating parts of the Hamiltonian. Our task is to relate nR,riL to the weak interaction Hamiltonian. 

Indirect but important usage of Zeeman and Stark effects is found in fundamental physics researches for example measurements of violation of symmetry in physical laws under time and space inversion known as the T-violation and the parity violation, respectively. Such measurements would eventually give... 

A natural question is how much of an excess do we need in the chiral pool. Do we need the 10% or so that the optimistic predictions of chiral photodestruction in space might give us, or will the one molecule in 10 predicted by the parity-violating weak interaction be sufficient In thinking about this question we need to keep in mind again that we have billions of pools over billions of years, so that even if the chemical reaction that we need to get life started is very rare, we have lots of time and many pots to work with. In most of the attempts to answer... 

The conclusion of these works is that the parity (P) invariance and, separately, the charge conjugation (C) invariance are violated in P decay, while the time reversal (T) or combined CP invariance is not. The parity non-invariance (i.e., non-invariance of the Hamiltonian of the weak interaction under space reflection) can be expressed alternativelyby saying that the parity is not conserved. This formulation is a consequence of the fact that the parity P is an observable quantity. The presence of two-pion decay mode in the K° kaon decay implies, however, that even the CP invariance is violated in the weak interaction (Christenson et al. 1964). 

---