Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solution curves normal, defined

Now since VR is everywhere orthogonal to the surface R -C, X is always in the direction of the normal to the surface of n. The requirement (1.10.4), abbreviated as X dx- 0, may be met by having dx perpendicular to X, i.e., everywhere tangent to the surface R - C. Therefore, solution curves Cn to X dx -0, formed by adjoining the various infinitesimal segments dx, must lie entirely on the surface defined by (1.10.5). Finally, it should be evident that there exist a vast multitude of points in not accessible by solution curves Cn of (1.10.4), namely all points not lying on the surface n. [Pg.71]

By its very definition the gradient of R is everywhere orthogonal to the surface S specified by / = C. Therefore, X (with components Xj = (9i /9x,)) likewise points in the direction normal to the surface S. Moreover, the requirement X dx = 0 is met by requiring dx to be perpendicular to X, that is, tangent at all points to the surface S. Therefore, the solution curves G formed by adjoining all the dx segments must lie entirely on the surface S defined by Eq. (9.1.5). It should be self-evident that there exists a throng of points in the hyperspace, outside the surface S, that are not accessible via the solution curves G. [Pg.428]

For low-molecular strong electrolytes the concentration dependence of equivalent conductivity is simple and universal. From a well-defined limiting value the equivalent conductivity decreases monotonically with increasing concentration, although the conductivity curves normally exhibit a distinct curvature, as the decrease levels off at high concentrations. The decrease of equivalent conductivity in these solutions is a result of increased interionic friction, which increases as the interionic distances decrease with increasing concentration. [Pg.218]

If the fragility curve is log-normally distributed and the hazard curve is defined by Eq. (7), a rigorous closed form solution exists for the seismic risk equation ... [Pg.81]

The strength of noncovalent interactions of nucleic acid complexes is routinely determined by their temperature-dependent melting behavior in solution where the fraction of intact complex (oc) is determined as a function of the temperature of the solution. UV absorption, fluorescence, or circular dichroism is usually employed as the means of detection of biomolecular interactions in this type of experiments. A transition enthalpy can be obtained from the slope of the melting curve as described by Marky and Breslauer and given in Eq. (15.7), where n is the molecularity of the association reaction (e.g., n = 2 for dimerization) and Tm is the melting temperature, normally defined for a = 50%. [Pg.560]

The plot of normalized steady-state current vs. tip-interface distance, shown in Fig. 12, demonstrates that as the tip-interface distance decreases the steady-state current becomes more sensitive to the value of Kg. Under the defined conditions the shape of the approach curve is highly dependent on the concentration in the second phase, for Kg values over a very wide range, with a lower limit less than 0.1 and upper limit greater than 50. This suggests that SECMIT can be used to determine the concentration of a target solute in a phase, without the UME entering that phase, provided that the diffusion coefficients of the solute in the two phases are known. [Pg.308]

Fig. 7.4. Wavefunctions of the hydrogen molecular ion. (a) The exact wavefunctions of the hydrogen molecular ion. The two lowest states are shown. The two exact solutions can be considered as symmetric and antisymmetric linear combinations of the solutions of the left-hand-side and right-hand-side problems, (b) and (c), defined by potential curves in Fig. 7.3. For brevity, the normalization constant is omitted. (Reproduced from Chen, 1991c, with permission.)... Fig. 7.4. Wavefunctions of the hydrogen molecular ion. (a) The exact wavefunctions of the hydrogen molecular ion. The two lowest states are shown. The two exact solutions can be considered as symmetric and antisymmetric linear combinations of the solutions of the left-hand-side and right-hand-side problems, (b) and (c), defined by potential curves in Fig. 7.3. For brevity, the normalization constant is omitted. (Reproduced from Chen, 1991c, with permission.)...
Both equations are useful to obtain well-defined D values in each experiment based on a fitting method. Although we understand that the form in Eq. (33.9) is more general, the numerical data from FCS measurement is not sufficient to obtain the full lineshape of D(t) in Eq. (33.9). Seki et al. obtained an analytical solution of autocorrelation curves for D(L) in a step function [39]. They proved that the solution lineshape is different from that of normal diffusion with a non-linear least square algorithm if the deviation from Eq. (33.17) is too small. Even in this case of moderate anomalous diffusion, the observed value of D changes sensitively,depending on f or I. [Pg.381]

As suggested by the above discussion, there are serious problems with the Bjerrum model. One of these relates to the fact that unreasonably large critical distances are involved in defining an ion pair in solutions of low permittivity. The second relates to the fact that the probability distribution is not normalized and continues to increase with increase in distance r. The latter problem is effectively avoided by considering only those values of P r) up to the minimum in the curve. [Pg.139]

The solution of the optimization problem is depicted in a 2D plot of the involved objectives (figure 8.6). Each non-inferior attainable optimal solution is estimated at a given combination of objectives including constraint g xi,X2)- All these points define a curve of non-inferior solutions, normally referred to as Pareto curve. For the sake of transparency a linear relation between objectives is considered (. e. F = TjWi x fi), where Wi is the weighting factor of the objective function fi and Ylwi = 1. As expected, the utopia point is given by the coordinates... [Pg.176]

To verify the predictions of eqn [69] for the osmotic coefficient, Figure 16 shows a universal plot of the reduced osmotic coefficient yo ° /yR as a function of the normalized polymer concentration cjc. For the rodlike chains, we define the overlap concentration c as monomer concentration in the cylindrical zone 4NI nL ), which is an overlap concentration for rodlike polyions. All points collapse onto the universal curve as predicted by eqn [69] for rodlike polyelectrolyte solutions (see Figure 16(a)). However, the size Re of flexible chains is a function of the polymer concentration because polyelectrolytes contract with increasing polymer concentration. To collapse all points into one universal curve and to take into account the chain contraction in Figure 16(b), the reduced osmotic coefficient yo ° /yR is plotted against the ratio of... [Pg.95]

Fig. 9.6. Evolution of normalized amplitudes a t)/X and a2 t)/X according to the differential equation (9.63). The dashed curve is the solution of the hnearized differential equation (9.63)i for a t)/X. The normahzed time scale is (1 + vYtln where t is defined in (9.62). Fig. 9.6. Evolution of normalized amplitudes a t)/X and a2 t)/X according to the differential equation (9.63). The dashed curve is the solution of the hnearized differential equation (9.63)i for a t)/X. The normahzed time scale is (1 + vYtln where t is defined in (9.62).

See other pages where Solution curves normal, defined is mentioned: [Pg.11]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.738]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.2428]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.555]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.6149]    [Pg.7526]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.579]    [Pg.172]   


SEARCH



Curve normal

Normal solution

Solution curve

Solutions, defined

© 2024 chempedia.info