Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Site point connection methods

Site point connection methods include CL1X, LUDI, the linked-algorithm approach of Verlinde and co-workers, and Klebe s analysis of crystal field environments.  [Pg.22]

As mentioned earlier, LUDI has been used in conjunction with GRID on several projects, involving the design of PLA2 inhibitors - and the modification of cytochrome P450cam substrates.- The use of LUDI to design inhibitors of FKBP-12 has been reported.  [Pg.23]

Klebe carefully analyzed the nonbonded contacts observed in the Cambridge Structural Database. The analysis was carried out for each funaional group of interest (carboxylate, amide, sulfate, alcohol, etc.). Because of the large [Pg.23]


Site point connection methods Determine desirable locations of individual atoms ( site points ) and then place fragments within the active site so that those locations are occupied by suitable atoms. [Pg.2]

Site point connection methods include CLIX, the... [Pg.7]

Whether the fragment placement is direct or via site point connection, the methods have the obvious advantage of rapidly locating the hot spots in the... [Pg.544]

The site point connection approaches listed in category 2 may be viewed, in principle, as fragment-by-fragment sequential buildup procedures. However, an important difference is that the sequential buildup methods often allow for some conformational adjustment as eadi fragment is added to the ligand. This is not generally done with site point methods. [Pg.13]

Moreover, as the system of Eq. (24) is a starting point for the cluster-type approach and the MC method, therefore in principle the two methods can be used in combination. It has been proposed by Hood et al. [297] to write down the kinetic equations for describing variations in the occupancy state of each lattice site, i.e., to abandon consideration of the lattice ensemble, and to solve the system of the equations with the dimension equal to the number of sites. The system of the connected equations has been solved numerically. In each time interval the desorption probability for a given molecule is determined by the random sampling and then the general adsorbate change found. The combination approach allows to trace the adlayer structure and to construct a correlation between the structural and the kinetic behavior of the process. Such an approach has been applied to the N2/Ru(001) system to obtain a qualitative agreement with experiment [298]. [Pg.437]

Ionomers are polymers that are functionalized with ionic groups (usually anionic sites) attached at various points along polymeric backbones that are not extensively crosslinked (1-2). Such materials have a tendency to form ionic domains in which the anionic groups and their associated cations are microphase separated from the typically hydrophobic portions of the polymer. Thus, the ionic domains formed are isolated by a medium of low dielectric constant (i.e. the polymeric backbone) although, in some cases, hydrophilic channels have been reported to connect adjacent ionic domains (3). The size and structures of these domains vary with the nature of the cation, the stoichiometry of the polymer, the degree of solvation of the system and the method of preparation. They can be as small as ion-pairscor small multiplets, but in some cases they have been reported to be in the 20-100 A" diameter range. [Pg.66]

The combinatorial docking tools PRO SELECT [121] and CombiDOCK [122] are based on the incremental construction method. In both approaches, a library is formed by a template (or core) molecule with a set of attachment points to which one out of a predefined set of substituents can be connected. The template is then positioned in the active site without considering the substituents. Starting from a few orientations of the template, the substituents are placed into the active site of the protein independently. In case of PRO SELECT, substituents are then selected based on score and additional criteria like 2D similarity and feasibility of synthesis. CombiDOCK calculates a final score for whole library molecules by combining fragment scores. [Pg.351]

Another issue not to be overlooked is site support costs. Do I need to pay for extension of the rail line, upgrade construction of the local street, extend sewer or water lines, modify electrical source connected to, are but a few to be considered. The only effective method of covering this adequately is to study the plant operations and list all the items it will consume or discharge and mentally walk them back to an adequate connection point. Beware of utilities that must be generated, the cost of supplies to, and the discharges from, the generating operation must be included in the estimate. Only when an in-depth effort is made to uncover hidden scope can it be imcovered in time to be included in the estimate. [Pg.775]


See other pages where Site point connection methods is mentioned: [Pg.7]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.5181]    [Pg.662]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.667]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.748]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.1104]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.886]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.6 , Pg.22 ]




SEARCH



Connectivity method

Point method

Site point

© 2024 chempedia.info