Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Simplifying assumptions steady state approximation

Assume that the steady-state approximation can be applied to the intermediate TI. Derive the kinetic expression for hydrolysis of the imine. How many variables must be determined to construct the pH-rate profile What simplifying assumptions are justified at very high and very low pH values What are the kinetic expressions that result from these assumptions ... [Pg.506]

These simplifying assumptions must be adapted to some extent to explain the nature of some reactions on catalyst surfaces. The case of ammonia synthesis on supported ruthenium described in Example 5.3.1 presents a situation that is similar to rule 1, except the rate-determining step does not involve the mari. Nevertheless, the solution of the problem was possible. Example 5.3.2 involves a similar scenario. If a mari cannot be assumed, then a rate expression can be derived through repeated use of the steady-state approximation to eliminate the concentrations of reactive intermediates. [Pg.162]

A steady-state approximation is often used in order to simplify the mathematical description of complicated reaction mechanisms. Below we will use simulation to illustrate when such a simplifying assumption is appropriate, and when it is not. We will use the reaction sequence A + B—C —> products. C can either be a chemically identifiable species, or a presumed or hypothetical intermediate, such as a transition state or activated complex. The rate equations are... [Pg.369]

The same series reaction network, but considered under a commonly applied simplifying assumption, illustrates the central approximation used in the formulation of all reaction mechanisms the steady state approximation. This states that the net rate of change of the concentration of an unstable intermediate is zero. In the above network the intermediate B can be relatively stable, in which case its concentration increases to a maximum and then falls, or it can be unstable. If B is unstable, then soon after the reaction starts and a small amount of B is formed, any further B formed is immediately converted to C. Soon after the reaction begins therefore a steady state concentration of B is achieved where the net accumulation of B is effectively zero. We write this steady state condition as follows ... [Pg.48]

For elementary reactions the kinetics are relatively simple, and there are straightforward mathematical expressions that allow us to solve for rate constants. These simple mechanisms are those we analyze first. They involve first and second order kinetics, along with variations including pseudo-first order and equilibrium kinetics. We also look at a method to measure rate constants known as initial-rate kinetics. We analyze complex reactions only under the simplifying assumption of the steady state approximation (Section 7.5.1), and show how kinetic orders can change with concentration. More advanced methods for analyzing complex reactions are left to texts that specialize in kinetics. [Pg.384]

In order to simplify the kinetic scheme a steady-state approximation has to be made. It is assumed that under steady-state conditions the net rate of production of radicals is zero. This means that in unit time the number of radicals produced by the initiation process must equal the number destroyed during the termination process. If this were not so and the total number of radicals increased during the reaction, the temperature would rise rapidly and there could even be an explosion since the propagation reactions are normally exothermic. In practice it is found that the steady-state assumption is usually valid for all but the first few seconds of most free radical addition polymerization reactions. [Pg.38]

The rotating ring—disc electrode (RRDE) is probably the most well-known and widely used double electrode. It was invented by Frumkin and Nekrasov [26] in 1959. The ring is concentric with the disc with an insulating gap between them. An approximate solution for the steady-state collection efficiency N0 was derived by Ivanov and Levich [27]. An exact analytical solution, making the assumption that radial diffusion can be neglected with respect to radial convection, was obtained by Albery and Bruckenstein [28, 29]. We follow a similar, but simplified, argument below. [Pg.365]

The kinetic model of styrene auto-initiation proposed by Hui and Hameilec [27] was used as a starting point for this work. The Mayo initiation mechanism was assumed (Figure 7.2) but the acid reaction was of course omitted. After invoking the quasi-steady-state assumption (QSSA) to approximate the reactive dimer concentration, Hui and Hameilec used different simplifying assumptions to derive initiation rate equations that are second and third order in monomer concentration. [Pg.141]

Many numerical models make additional assumptions, valid if only some specific questions are being asked. For example, if one is not interested in the start-up phase or in changing the operation of a fuel cell, one may apply the steady state condition that time-independent solutions are requested. In certain problems, one may disregard temperature variations, and in the free gas ducts, laminar flow may be imposed. The diffusion in porous media is often approximated by an assumption of isotropy for the gas diffusion or membrane layer, and the coupling to chemical reactions is often simplified or omitted. Water evaporation and condensation, on the other hand, are often a key determinant for the behaviour of a fuel cell and thus have to be modelled at some level. [Pg.152]

The kinetics is simplified by assuming that the generated radical Q does neither reinitiate nor show any transfer behavior. The steady-state assumption— which is only a very rough approximation until all inhibitor is consumed (475)— can now be written as... [Pg.6975]

In this chapter we first consider a mathematically tractable model mechanism and demonstrate that, depending upon the relative magnitudes of the rate constants, there are two chemical approximations that may be appropriate for simplifying analysis the preequilibrium and the steady-state assumptions. We then demonstrate how hypotheses based upon these simplifications are used to interpret rate law data and to develop chemically reasonable mechanistic descriptions for gas- and solution-phase reactions. Finally we consider the problem of catalysis, i.c., how addition of trace amounts of an intermediate permits a sluggish or kinetically forbidden reaction to become rapid if a new mechanistic pathway can be created. [Pg.114]

The third term on the rhs of Eq. 202 is zero due to axi-symmetry. We further restrict ourselves to a quasi steady-state solution, i.e. we assume that at any given time /, the flow can be approximated as being steady. This would mean, for instance, that the impulsive loading involved in the start-up of the squeeze would not be covered by the solution. The quasi steady-state assumption allows us to discard the term on the Ihs of Eq. 202. The simplified z-momentum equation is thus... [Pg.491]


See other pages where Simplifying assumptions steady state approximation is mentioned: [Pg.77]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.688]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.551]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.63 ]




SEARCH



Simplified

Simplify

Simplifying assumptions

Steady-state approximation

© 2024 chempedia.info