Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Shell predicting crystal structures

Although the positions of all E dimers in the outer shell of the particle were known, a precise interpretation of the density contributed by the M protein was not possible. This was due to the lack of detailed information concerning the C-terminal 101 amino acids of the E protein that were missing from the crystal structure. These residues form the stalk region, the transmembrane domain, and the NSl signal sequence. Approximately 52 residues would compose the stalk and are found in a shell of density in which the short M protein (37 amino acids outside of the membrane) would also be predicted to be found. Together, the M and the E proteins completely cover the lipid bilayer so that there is no exposed membrane in the dengue particle. [Pg.369]

Electrical Properties. The piezoelectricity of the technologically important polymer of vinylidene fluoride (PVDF) has been the subject of modeling for several decades (see Piezoelectric Polymers). An early example of the use of molecular mechanics to aid in the calculation of the mechanical and electrical properties of this polymer is found in the work of Tadokoro and co-workers (390,391). Subsequent investigation of PVDF by Karasawa and Goddard (83) focussed on the prediction of alternative crystal structures with use of the shell model to captiu-e polarization effects. The latter phenomenon was further explored by Carbeck and co-workers (84), who used the shell model to show that the induced moment because of neighboring dipoles in the crystal increases the dipole per repeat imit by about 50% over its value in the isolated molecule. [Pg.4833]

This chapter is an introduction to the field of intermolecular interaction and to the modem ab initio electronic structure methods - primarily those based on perturbation theory - that have been developed to study them. We will be mainly concerned with applications to small organic molecules for which accuracies of the order of a kj mol" or less are sufficient. High-accuracy calculations on small dimers can be orders of magnitude more accurate, but these are the subject of a specialist review (see Szalewicz et al. 2005 for a review and references). Nor are we concerned with empirical methods. Our focus will be on first principles methods for the interactions of closed-shell systems in the non-relativistic limit. In the last decade, ab initio methods have been used to successfully model the structure of liquid water. (Bukowski et al. 2007) studied the interactions between DNA base tetramers (Fiethen et al. 2008) and predicted the crystal structure of an organic molecule (Misquitta et al. 2008b). The goal of this chapter is to describe the main theoretical developments that have been responsible for these applications. [Pg.159]

Extensive DFT and PP calculations have permitted the establishment of important trends in chemical bonding, stabilities of oxidation states, crystal-field and SO effects, complexing ability and other properties of the heaviest elements, as well as the role and magnitude of relativistic effects. It was shown that relativistic effects play a dominant role in the electronic structures of the elements of the 7 row and heavier, so that relativistic calculations in the region of the heaviest elements are indispensable. Straight-forward extrapolations of properties from lighter congeners may result in erroneous predictions. The molecular DFT calculations in combination with some physico-chemical models were successful in the application to systems and processes studied experimentally such as adsorption and extraction. For theoretical studies of adsorption processes on the quantum-mechanical level, embedded cluster calculations are under way. RECP were mostly applied to open-shell compounds at the end of the 6d series and the 7p series. Very accurate fully relativistic DFB ab initio methods were used for calculations of the electronic structures of model systems to study relativistic and correlation effects. These methods still need further development, as well as powerful supercomputers to be applied to heavy element systems in a routine manner. Presently, the RECP and DFT methods and their combination are the best way to study the theoretical chemistry of the heaviest elements. [Pg.86]

The Jahn-Teller theorem indicates that when a degenerate shell is not completely filled, a distortion away from spherical symmetry occurs, leading to a loss of degeneracy. The splitting pattern produced by the Jahn-Teller type distortion is identical to that predicted by the crystal field approach used in the structural jellium model. [Pg.12]

Recently XAS investigations were used to explore the Cu UPD process as a function of applied potential on carbon-supported Au nanoparticles [23]. Analysis of both the Cu and Au extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) indicated only partial monolayer coverage at potentials where a complete Cu monolayer is predicted for single crystals. The structure of deposited Cu was found to be more consistent with Cu cluster formation at defects in the Au surface than the presence of a smooth monolayer due to lower than expected numbers of Au-Cu neighbors and Cu-Cu neighbors fitted in EXAFS analysis. The absence of a uniform mono-layer of Cu on the nanoparticles implies that subsequent displacement of Cu by Pt is unlikely to result in the formation of a uniform Pt shell [23]. [Pg.566]

The distinction between model and theory in science has long been disputed. Traditionally, a model in chemistry is taken to be an image of a chemical system, be it the shell model of an atomic structure or a ball and stick model of a compound or crystal stracture. These models can be realised, made tangible in order to add an experiential component to the understanding of the theory upon which they are based. By contrast a theory is a set of hypotheses about the world, formulated into a coherent explanation about how things work, which furthermore has some predictive component which can be tested against. [Pg.71]


See other pages where Shell predicting crystal structures is mentioned: [Pg.20]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.838]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.718]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.677]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.813]    [Pg.811]    [Pg.903]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.1066]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.708]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.1918]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.1571]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.20 ]




SEARCH



Crystal prediction

Crystal structure prediction

Crystal structures, predicted

Crystallization predictions

Predicting structures

Shell structure

Structured-prediction

© 2024 chempedia.info