Shape domain graph

As for the other partitionings mentioned above, these neighbor relations and graphs can be restricted to various subsets S, such as relaxed cross sections, and in particular, to individual catchment regions C(X,i) of the nuclear configuration space M. This approach leads to the local shape domain graphs g(S,x) and g(C(X,i),x), respectively. 

Consider a MIDCO G(a) and a choice for the curvature parameter b, and assume that the shape domains of relative convexity of G(a) have been determined. By using an appropriate neighbor relation to describe the mutual arrangements of the domains along the MIDCO surface G(a), the corresponding shape matrix s(a,b) and the associated shape graph g (a,b) can be defined [109,110,158,193]. 

Figure 5.8 Three shape graphs, g(0.01,0), g(0.01,0.005), and g(0.01,-0.008), of the three shape domain partitionings of the allyl alcohol MIDCO G(O.Ol) of Figure 5.6 are shown. These shape graphs correspond to the three shape matrices s(0.01,0), 3(0.01,0.005), and...

The corresponding graph g(M,x), characterizing the distribution of shape domains within the nuclear configuration space M, is defined by its vertex set and edge set as follows ... 

The calculation of the Excitation profile displays the effect of a shaped pulse on several magnetization vectors with different rf offsets. The result is a two dimensional graph of either one Cartesian or a combination of Cartesian coordinates as function of the relative offset. From the appearance of the graph the uniformity of the phase and the excitation of the magnetization may be determined within the frequency domain (frequency window of interest). 

Universal exponential shape. A comparison between various domains reveals the same structure of Formal Graphs which points to the fact that identical shapes of relations in these graphs must exist. The most general shape for the... 

Similarities of operator shapes. A comparison between various domains reveals the same structure of Formal Graphs which points to the fact that identical shapes of relations in these graphs must exist. The most general shape for the capacitive relations is the exponential function, utilized here in the thermal energy variety. However, the thermal energy is a notorious exception as the role of the state variables is inverted (meaning that the capacitive relationship is a logarithmic function instead of an exponential function). 

Formal Graph theory extends it to many other domains by generalizing the classical model. The most interesting extension is to the physical chemical energy variety as it allows the concept of activity to be founded on a rigorous basis. The demonstration of the exponential shape of the capacitive relationship will rely on this extension. 

The proposition of a unique exponential shape, which may tend toward a linear asymptote in a restricted range, is a first step in evidencing the homogeneity among domains that is induced by the observed similarity between graph structures. The problem is that this approach is purely heuristic... 

It can be observed that this relationship is not a linear relation as Q = CV which is predicted by electrostatics. Nevertheless, the Formal Graph approach shows that the strnctnres are identical from one domain to the other and that, when an invariable coupling occurs, it should be the same for operators and therefore for the properties of a system. Two choices remain whether the linear relationship is the general rule and an ion population is an exception, or whether the exponential shape is the rule and electrostatics is the exception. 

As an illustration, here we shall outline only one of the simplest of the nonvisual, topological methods for shape characterization, applicable for smooth (differentiable) molecular surfaces. This method is based on the classification of the points of a molecular surface into convex, concave, and saddle-type domains using local curvature properties, and on the representation of the mutual arrangements of these domains by a matrix or by an equivalent graph. One of the advantages of the method is the fact that the generation... 

The shape graph g (a,b) is defined by specifying the entities considered as the vertices of the graph, and by stating which pairs of the vertices are connected by edges. The vertex set of graph gjia )) is the family of domains ... 

The edge set of the shape graph gA, b) is the family of pairs of D domains with nonzero N-nei bor relation ... 

Figure 12.3 Shape and location of the co-crystal domain in the ternary phase diagram depending on (a) and (b) the relative thermodynamic stability of the co-crystal, (c) and (d) the relative solubility of the two components, and (e) and (f) the types of interaction in solution. The solubilities of the components, the solubility product of the co-crystal, and the virial coefficients for calculating the solubility curves are indicated on the left of each graph (cf.. Equations (12.5) to (12.7)).

---