Self-energy contact

The self-energy coefficient can be calculated simply from basic electrostatics. It depends on the size of the contact, and slightly on the shape, but assuming nearly circular contacts should be a good approximation. Since the electronic polarizability of the molecules will respond to the new situation, the electrostatic misfit energy is better approximated if we take this into account by reducing the energy by a portion, /dieiectric( °o = 2) = 0.4. Thus, we obtain the expression... 

Fig. 4 Real and imaginary parts of the contact self-energy as a function of energy for a one-band one-dimensional lead.

The total van der Waals energy (per pair of successive water and oil layers and unit area) is computed by adding all the interactions between each of the layers of the pair and all the layers in the system to their interaction and their self-energies. When two layers are in contact, it was considered that a small (but finite) distance e, which is related to the closest approach between molecules, separates the layers. 

Abstract In strong-coupling superconductors with a short electron mean free path the self-energy effects in the superconducting order parameter play a major role in the phonon manifestation of the point-contact spectra at above-gap energies. We compare the expressions for the nonlinear conductivity of tunnel, ballistic, and diffusive point-contacts and show that these expression are similar and correspond to the measurements of the phonon structure in the point-contact spectra for the 7r-band of MgB2. 

The self-energy effect in the phonon feature of a superconducting point contact can be used, in principle, in the same way as the Rowell-McMillan program for determination of the EPI spectral function in tunneling spectroscopy of superconductors [16]. Two difficulties arise on this way. One is theoretical, since this program works well only for the one-band superconductor, and its application to the two-band case, like MgB2, encounters difficulties [17]. The other is experimental, since all other sources of I — V nonlinearities should be removed, and especially, the nonequilibrium effects in superconductor should be excluded. 

The question may arise whether the self-energy effects are important in the normal state. These are known to be smaller than the inelastic backscattering nonlinearities in the ballistic regime [18]. If we decrease the contact size d or the elastic mean free path li in order to make the inelastic contribution negligible, the latter parameters become comparable to the Fermi wave length of charge carriers and the strong nonlinearities connected with localization occur, which masks the desired phonon structure [19]. 

We briefly note from our computational approach the part relevant to electrode contributions. The contact effects due to the electrodes are to renormalize the electronic structure of the device molecule. The self-energy explicitly involves the contact effects on the molecule region due to the electrodes, so it plays a critical role in determining the transport characteristics its real/imaginary parts give rise to shift and broadening of the molecular energy levels. 

This form could be rather general, provided the initial system-bath factorization ansatz, Px( ) = p(0)Pb. is applicable and the system Hamiltonian is time-independent. In contact with the HEOM formalism of eqn (13.27), we show in section 13.4.2 that the memory dissipation kernel in eqn (13.47), H(r), is the time-domain counterpart of a self-energy in the hierarchical Liouville space. 

As mentioned earlier, the contact-mechanics-based experimental studies of interfacial adhesion primarily include (1) direct measurements of surface and interfacial energies of polymers and self-assembled monolayers (2) quantitative studies on the role of interfacial coupling agents in the adhesion of elastomers (3) adhesion of microparticles on surfaces and (4) adhesion of viscoelastic polymer particles. In these studies, a variety of experimental tools have been employed by different researchers. Each one of these tools offers certain advantages over the others. These experimental studies are reviewed in Section 4. 

Section 4.1 briefly describes some of the commonly employed experimental tools and procedures. Chaudhury et al., Israelachvili et al. and Tirrell et al. employed contact mechanics based approach to estimate surface energies of different self-assembled monolayers and polymers. In these studies, the results of these measurements were compared to the results of contact angle measurements. These measurements are reviewed in Section 4.2. The JKR type measurements are discussed in Section 4.2.1, and the measurements done using the surface forces apparatus (SFA) are reviewed in Section 4.2.2. 

---