Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Matrix selectivity rate constant

As discussed earlier, the selectivity rate constant matrix K contains one element that is unity, that is, k /k = 1. This property allows the elements of K to be determined from composition data alone. The selectivity time t, defined in Eq. (11), does not need to be independently known. [Pg.214]

To illustrate the method of determining the selectivity rate constant matrix, it first must be shown that x can be uniquely related to C5 - at any position in the reactor bed. This can be demonstrated using the C6 system as an example (see Fig. 10) ... [Pg.214]

In Eq. (14), C5- monotonically increases with x through the hexane concentration, and therefore is uniquely related to x. Equation (14) allows the selectivity rate constant matrix to be fit in a selectivity space with the observed C5- concentration as the independent variable and all C6+ compositions as the dependent variables. [Pg.214]

As a result of irreversible reforming cracking reactions, the selectivity rate constant matrix K contains one column of zeros. Therefore, K wifl always yield one zero eigenvalue. Let XN, one of the elements in matrix A, be set to 0 arbitrarily. After it is realized that XN = 0, the integration of the exponential diagonal matrix of Eq. (19) is done term by term. In matrix notation, the integration yields... [Pg.216]

The fitting sequence is based on the following partitioning of the 13 x 13 selectivity rate constant matrix K ... [Pg.228]

The deactivation kinetics were determined through a series of seven separate parameter estimation problems. As with the start-of-cycle case, separate estimating problems resulted from uncoupling the reactions of each carbon number by properly selecting the charge stock. This allowed the independent determination of submatrices in the rate constant matrix Dp [Eq. (37)]. [Pg.231]

During the selectivity kinetic parameter estimation, the relationship for x in terms of C5 - is determined from Eq. (12). For an assumed set of rate constants K, x is calculated for each composition data point such that the experimentally measured C5- equals that estimated from Eq. (12). Selectivity composition profiles as a function of C5- are generated in this manner. The proper selectivity matrix K will be that which minimizes the deviation between experimental and predicted profiles for the hydrocarbons other than C5-, as illustrated in Fig. 10. [Pg.214]

The discrimination shown by a componnd in reacting with two or more positions on the same componnd or several componnds. It is quantitatively expressed by ratios of rate constants of the competing reactions or by the decadic logarithms of snch ratios. It also refers to the differential affinity of componnds to a chromatographic matrix. Chromatographic selectivity is a determining factor in resointion the nse of selectivity is disconraged in favor of the nse of the term separation factors. ... [Pg.207]

An analysis of the time course of luminescence emission following selective laser excitation has enabled the forward and reverse rate constants to be obtained for the equilibrium between the Eu" complex of 1,2-diaminocyclohexanetetraacetate, [Eu(DCTA)], and iminodiacetate, IMDA, to form the ternary complex [Eu(DCTA)(IMDA)] . Some other systems in which chemical interconversion processes occur at rates much greater than, or much slower than, the reciprocal excited-state lifetime of the Eu" -containing species were also examined. A matrix isolation e.s.r. study has appeared of the photoreduction of the formato-complex of Eu " in a formic acid-sodium formate buffer. A three-step cyclic scheme has been suggested to explain the observations, namely photoreduction of by Eu, radical alternation from H to C02 , and oxidation of CO2 by Eu ". ... [Pg.186]

Catalytic behaviour of the footprint materials followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics, yielding a Michaelis constant and catalytic rate constant A cat for each imprinted matrix. The value of characterises the interaction of the enzyme with the substrate, similar to but not equal to dissociation constants. The constant Acat is the rate at which the active site converts the substrate to product. Together, the ratio kcaJKm is the enzyme selectivity, which describes the active site s efficiency in catalysing a reaction on a particular substrate. [Pg.236]

These two differential equations describe how selection acts on parts of the replicating unit. The equations are equivalent to the selection Eqn. (III. 15) in so far as no simplifying assumptions were made except the two concerning the structure of the mutation matrix Q. The interaction between the two parts of the polynucleotide occurs via the average rate constants Ajq, B,o, Aqj and Dqj as well as implicitly through the common average excess production ... [Pg.188]

Hamilton and Burwell obtained 2.6 for the value of the relative rate constant (k2i/k3i) for which we obtain 2.85. This difference in value is probably caused by the particular selection of data used in each case. The set of reaction paths shown by the solid lines in Fig. 27 were calculated using the matrix T (Section II,B,2,j). [Pg.289]

Figure 4.11. Hypothetical reactivity-selectivity profile for the interaction of a weakly reactive digitalis compound (D,) or a strongly reactive digitalis compound (Ds) with Na lJC-ATPase isoenzymes or Eg, which differ in the chemotopography of the digitalis binding matrix. Selectivity is shown to be a reflection of the differential height of the activation Gibbs energy barrier, which is equivalent to the association rate constant. In other words, the inhibitor D, will preferentially bind to the isoenzyme Eg, whereas inhibitor D2 will equally bind to both isoenzymes. Eg and Eg (adapted from [251]). Figure 4.11. Hypothetical reactivity-selectivity profile for the interaction of a weakly reactive digitalis compound (D,) or a strongly reactive digitalis compound (Ds) with Na lJC-ATPase isoenzymes or Eg, which differ in the chemotopography of the digitalis binding matrix. Selectivity is shown to be a reflection of the differential height of the activation Gibbs energy barrier, which is equivalent to the association rate constant. In other words, the inhibitor D, will preferentially bind to the isoenzyme Eg, whereas inhibitor D2 will equally bind to both isoenzymes. Eg and Eg (adapted from [251]).
The disadvantages of the model include the fact that it depends on the selected historical transition matrix. The applicability of this matrix to future periods needs to be considered carefully, whether, for example, it adequately describes future credit migration patterns. In addition it assumes all securities with the same credit rating have the same spread, which is restrictive. For this reason the spread levels chosen in the model are a key assumption in the pricing model. Finally, the constant recovery rate is another practical constraint as in practice, the level of recovery will vary. [Pg.672]

Figure 6.1 shows a selection of these matrix elements, expressed as rate constants for state-to-state processes... [Pg.66]

In practice, the data is analysed using global analysis, in which aU the data (the truncated matrix A) are simultaneously fitted to a selected reaction mechanism. The inputs for this analysis are the partial reactions describing the system, in which each species is represented by one letter. The initial concentration for each species is then introduced together with the guessed rate constants for each one of the partial reactions. This software package is provided by manufacturers of the stopped-flow instruments. [Pg.235]

The most accurate theoretical treatment of this rate constant is by Zhang and Miller [16] in 1989, using the 5-matrix version of the Kohn vaxiational principle. Their result is hv-Lj=o(T = 300 K) = 1.63. However, they reported the rate constant for D-fH2(u = 1,7 = 0), and the experiment by Dreier and Wolfrum involved a thermal distribution of reactant j-states. With the extreme importance of fundamentally understanding the role of vibrational excitation in chemical reactions, we undertook the calculation of this rate constant with the present initial state selected formalism. We will show that quantitative agreement has now been obtained [17]. [Pg.133]


See other pages where Matrix selectivity rate constant is mentioned: [Pg.212]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.674]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.891]    [Pg.1675]    [Pg.3242]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.771]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.554]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.214 , Pg.216 , Pg.230 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.285 ]




SEARCH



Rate matrix

Selectivity matrix

© 2024 chempedia.info