Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Screening electronic structure

The screened proton model of nickel or palladium hydrides and Switendick s concept of the electronic structure do not constitute a single approach sufficient to explain the observed facts. In this review, however, such a model will be used as the basis for further discussions. It allows for the explanation and general interpretation of the observed change of catalytic activity of the metals, when transformed into their respective hydrides. [Pg.251]

Later methods, especially that of Gordy (1955), and later Allred and Rochow (1958) make use of screening constants of the electron structure for the nuclear charge of each atom. This determines the attraction between the nucleus of the atom and an electron outside the normal electron complement, and is the effective nuclear charge. The empirical equation for the values of electronegativity obtained in this manner by Allred and Rochow is... [Pg.65]

An important advantage of ECP basis sets is their ability to incorporate approximately the physical effects of relativistic core contraction and associated changes in screening on valence orbitals, by suitable adjustments of the radius of the effective core potential. Thus, the ECP valence atomic orbitals can approximately mimic those of a fully relativistic (spinor) atomic calculation, rather than the non-relativistic all-electron orbitals they are nominally serving to replace. The partial inclusion of relativistic effects is an important physical correction for heavier atoms, particularly of the second transition series and beyond. Thus, an ECP-like treatment of heavy atoms is necessary in the non-relativistic framework of standard electronic-structure packages, even if the reduction in number of... [Pg.713]

For instance, poly-p-phenylenes in their doped states manifest high electric conductivity (Shacklette et al. 1980). Banerjee et al. (2007) isolated the hexachloroantimonate of 4" -di(tert-butyl)-p-quaterphenyl cation-radical and studied its x-ray crystal structure. In this cation-radical, 0.8 part of spin density falls to the share of the two central phenyl rings, whereas the two terminal phenyl rings bear only 0.2 part of spin density. Consequently, there is some quinoidal stabilization of the cationic charge or polaron, which is responsible for the high conductivity. As it follows from the theoretical consideration by Bredas et al. (1982), the electronic structure of a lithium-doped quaterphenyl anion-radical also differs in a similar quinoidal distortion. With respect to conformational transition, this means less freedom for rotation of the rings in the ion-radicals of quaterphenyl. This effect was also observed for poly-p-phenylene cation-radical (Sun et al. 2007) and anion-radical of quaterphenyl p-quinone whose C—O bonds were screened by o,o-tert-hutyl groups (Nelsen et al. 2007). [Pg.331]

Transition metal (TM) systems present a fundamental dilemma for computational chemists. On the one hand, TM centers are often associated with relatively complicated electronic structures which appear to demand some form of quantum mechanical (QM) approach (1). On the other hand, all forms of QM are relatively compute intensive and are impractical for conformational searching, virtual high-throughput screening, or dynamics simulations... [Pg.1]

The Y-system will disturb the electronic structure of the X—H bond and consequently modify the currents in the bond that are induced by the primary magnetic field, leading to. a change of screening. [Pg.71]

As with the solution of other many-body electronic structure problems, determination of the unperturbed eigenvalues is numerically challenging and involves compromises in the following areas (1) approximations to the hamiltonian to simplify the problem (e.g., use of semi-empirical molecular orbital methods) (2) use of incomplete basis sets (3) neglect of highly excited states (4) neglect of screening effects due to other molecules in the condensed phase. [Pg.100]

The microscopic electronic structure of the buckyonion can be derived using an effective one-electron model where the screening effects are treated within the random phase approximation (RPA). The particular spherical geometry of these... [Pg.5]

Cyclic systems with 4m + 2 carbon atoms are characterized by the aromatic index m. At the lowest level (m = 0) ethylene formally corresponds to a 2-membered ring. The electronic structure shown in Figure 6.1 is consistent with aromatic electron distribution. Benzene (m = 1) is the prototype of properly cyclic aromatics. The molecular o-a-m conserves the sum of atomic angular momenta. The odd couples with the screening function are delocalized around the ring, with zero o-a-m. [Pg.218]

How to proceed with these matrix elements will depend upon which property one wishes to estimate. Let us begin by discussing the effect of the pseudopotential as a cause of diffraction by the electrons this leads to the nearly-free-electron approximation. The relation of this description to the description of the electronic structure used for other systems will be seen. We shall then compute the screening of the pseudopotential, which is necessary to obtain correct magnitudes for the form factors, and then use quantum-mechanical perturbation theory to calculate electron scattering by defects and the changes in energy that accompany distortion of the lattice. [Pg.367]


See other pages where Screening electronic structure is mentioned: [Pg.351]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.930]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.694]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.635]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.251]   


SEARCH



Electron screening

Screening, electronic

Structure screening

© 2024 chempedia.info