Relativistic core

SBKJC VDZ Available for Li(4.v4/>) through Hg(7.v7/ 5d), this is a relativistic basis set created by Stevens and coworkers to replace all but the outermost electrons. The double-zeta valence contraction is designed to have an accuracy comparable to that of the 3—21G all-electron basis set. Hay-Wadt MB Available for K(5.v5/>) through Au(5.v6/ 5r/), this basis set contains the valence region with the outermost electrons and the previous shell of electrons. Elements beyond Kr are relativistic core potentials. This basis set uses a minimal valence contraction scheme. These sets are also given names starting with LA for Los Alamos, where they were developed. 

This chapter provides only a brief discussion of relativistic calculations. Currently, there is a small body of references on these calculations in the computational chemistry literature, with relativistic core potentials comprising the largest percentage of that work. However, the topic is important both because it is essential for very heavy elements and such calculations can be expected to become more prevalent if the trend of increasing accuracy continues. 

Many researchers have performed calculations that include the two large-magnitude components of the spinnors. This provides a balance between high accuracy and making the calculation tractable. Such calculations are often done on atoms in order to obtain the wave function description used to create relativistic core potentials. 

The heavier elements are affected by relativistic effects. This is most often accounted for by using relativistic core potentials. Relativistic effects are discussed in more detail in Chapters 10 and 33. 

An important advantage of ECP basis sets is their ability to incorporate approximately the physical effects of relativistic core contraction and associated changes in screening on valence orbitals, by suitable adjustments of the radius of the effective core potential. Thus, the ECP valence atomic orbitals can approximately mimic those of a fully relativistic (spinor) atomic calculation, rather than the non-relativistic all-electron orbitals they are nominally serving to replace. The partial inclusion of relativistic effects is an important physical correction for heavier atoms, particularly of the second transition series and beyond. Thus, an ECP-like treatment of heavy atoms is necessary in the non-relativistic framework of standard electronic-structure packages, even if the reduction in number of... 

B. Background to Calculations Input Physics To understand the delicacy of the collapse simulation, one should recall the virial theorem for the non-relativistic core matter supported by a relativistic electron gas, for which... 

The Pauli operator of equations 2 to 5 has serious stability problems so that it should not, at least in principle, be used beyond first order perturbation theory (20). These problems are circumvented in the QR approach where the frozen core approximation (21) is used to exclude the highly relativistic core electrons from the variational treatment in molecular calculations. Thus, the core electronic density along with the respective potential are extracted from fully relativistic atomic Dirac-Slater calculations, and the core orbitals are kept frozen in subsequent molecular calculations. 

Relativistic atomic calculations are now widely available (Desclaux,87 Liberman,88 Carlson,89 and Grant85) and it seems likely that more attempts will be made to combine relativistic core functions with non-relativistic valence functions. 

Figure 2 A comparison of valence electron calculations of the potential energy curve of HgH 84 (a) non-relativistic core potential, SCF valence calculation (b) relativistic core potential, SCF valence calculation (c) relativistic core potential, MCSCF valence calculation. In each case the zero of energy is the sum of the appropriate atomic energies calculated in the same manner...

Configuration Interaction Using the Graphical Unitary Group Approach and Relativistic Core Potential and Spin—Orbit Operators. 

HF calculations with averaged relativistic core potentials (AREP). ECP1 only the ns and np electrons are included in the valence space (i.e. 4-valence electrons) ECP2 the (n — l)d subshell is also included in the valence space (i.e. 14-valence electrons) from References 88 and 89. 

Should we use a relativistic core function as our standard for fitting In general, should we use a Hamiltonian for the core electrons which is more accurate than (or, at least, different from) the valence-electron Hamiltonian to which the core potential is to be added This has similar consequences to the point above should we always retain the possibility of performing a full all-electron calculation which would provide a standard for the valence-only ceilculation ... 

---