Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Sato parameters, potential energy surfaces

At the time the experiments were perfomied (1984), this discrepancy between theory and experiment was attributed to quantum mechanical resonances drat led to enhanced reaction probability in the FlF(u = 3) chaimel for high impact parameter collisions. Flowever, since 1984, several new potential energy surfaces using a combination of ab initio calculations and empirical corrections were developed in which the bend potential near the barrier was found to be very flat or even non-collinear [49, M], in contrast to the Muckennan V surface. In 1988, Sato [ ] showed that classical trajectory calculations on a surface with a bent transition-state geometry produced angular distributions in which the FIF(u = 3) product was peaked at 0 = 0°, while the FIF(u = 2) product was predominantly scattered into the backward hemisphere (0 > 90°), thereby qualitatively reproducing the most important features in figure A3.7.5. [Pg.878]

The experimental results are compared with theoretical calculations using strictly empirical as well as Sato potential energy surfaces and a transition state theory formulation of the rate coefficient ratio. No one set of potential parameters could be found to fit all the data but it is not possible to attribute the deviations either to experimental error or the theory. [Pg.223]

Instead of performing the normal mode analysis we have used a more approximate method to take the qr- -coordinates into account. For the Cl - - CH4/CD4 reactions wc have in some work used a tanh-function in the breaking bond to interpolate between the saddle point and the product asymptote to get both the reaction thermicity and AfA" consistent with the ah initio calculations[18]. In addition, if the effective potential energy surface of the system is modeled by the semiempirical London-Eyring-Polanyi-Sato (LEPS) function, the correction is made directly in the Morse parameters for the two reactive bonds by adjusting the Sato parameters) , 19]. [Pg.258]

We shall present results for several kinds of potential energy surfaces. Many of the surfaces are obtained by the London-Eyring-Polanyi-Sato (LEPS) method, involving a single adjustable (Sato) parameter, or by the extended LEPS method, in which different Sato parameters are used for different atomic pairs. These methods are reviewed elsewhere.For other calculations we used rotated Morse curves (RMC),semiempirical valence bond (VB) surfaces, and rotated-Morse-bond-energy-bond-order (RMBEBO) surfaces. [Pg.597]

The accurate representation of multidimensional potential energy surfaces is a formidable problem. A common approach is to employ an expression that incorporates as much physical insight as possible in the functional form and which has a number of parameters that are adjusted to empirical data. Examples of this approach are found in applications of the London-Eyring-Polyani-Sato (LEPS), valence-bond (VB), diatomics-in-molecules (DIM), and many-body expansion methods to polyatomic systems. [Pg.785]


See other pages where Sato parameters, potential energy surfaces is mentioned: [Pg.30]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.645]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.243]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.197 , Pg.198 , Pg.199 ]




SEARCH



Energy parameters

Potential energy parameters

Potential parameters

Sato parameters

Surface parameters

© 2024 chempedia.info