River ANAlyzer

E. Mallat, C. Barzeb, A. Klotz, A. Brecht, G. Gauglits, and D. Barcelo, River Analyzer for chlorotri-azines with a direct optical immunosensor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33, 965—971 (1999). 

Water from towns main supplies is usually suitable for the preparation of water-based cutting fluids. That from factory bore holes is also generally suitable, although occasionally it contains excessive amounts of corrosive salts. Water from rivers, canals and ponds usually contains undesirable contaminants, and should be tested before use. A good first test is to mix a small quantity of emulsion and allow it to stand for 24 hours in this time, no more than a trace of the oil should separate. If serious separation occurs, the water should be analyzed to indicate the sort of remedial treatment required. 

Several studies have been conducted to measure methyl parathion in streams, rivers, and lakes. A U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) of western streams detected methyl parathion in five river samples taken from four states during a 14-month period in 1970 and 1971. The amount of methyl parathion detected ranged from 0.04 to 0.23 pg/L (Schultz et al. 1973). A later and more extensive USGS study analyzed water samples from major rivers of the United States four times yearly in the period of 1975-1985. Of the 2,861 water samples, 0.1% had detectable levels of methyl parathion (Gilliom et al. 1985). In a study of Arkansas surface waters, samples of lake and river/stream water were collected and analyzed over a three-year period (Senseman et al. 1997). Of the 485 samples collected, methyl parathion was found in one river/stream sample at a maximum concentration of 3.5 pg/L. Results from an EPA study in California detected methyl parathion in 3 of 18 surface drain effluent samples at concentrations of 10-190 ng/kg. Subsurface drain effluent water had concentrations of 10-170 ng/kg in 8 of 60 samples (lARC 1983). 

A uses study analyzed bed sediment samples from major rivers of the United States twice yearly in the period of 1975-1985. Methyl parathion was not detected in any sediment sample (Gilliom et al. 1985). 

The determination of DDT residue on apples grown in the Hood River fruit district and on pears at Medford is carried on in branch laboratories established in those areas. The majority of samples selected for analyses are suspected of carrying higher amounts of residue than the average because of the spray program used or because the last application of insecticide was made within a few weeks of harvest. As indicated by Table I, about 80% of all the samples analyzed carried 3.0 p.p.m. or less of DDT during the past harvest season. Only about 20% of the samples showed residues above 3.0 p.p.m. six samples showed residue deposits slightly above 7.0 p.p.m. 

At the end of the 1970s, OCPs were found in the waters of Belorussia s rivers the Dnepr, Western Dvina, Pripyati, and Nemana. Of the 960 analyzed samples, 82.7% contained DDT, and 81.6% contained HCH. Concentrations of the herbicide 2,4-D (amino salt) in drainage runoffs reached 1400 mkg/l (standards in those years were 200 mkg/l, and today are 2 mkg/l) [3]. 

Frequency domain performance has been analyzed with goodness-of-fit tests such as the Chi-square, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. The studies by Young and Alward (14) and Hartigan et. al. (J 3) demonstrate the use of these tests for pesticide runoff and large-scale river basin modeling efforts, respectively, in conjunction with the paired-data tests. James and Burges ( 1 6 ) discuss the use of the above statistics and some additional tests in both the calibration and verification phases of model validation. They also discuss methods of data analysis for detection of errors this last topic needs additional research in order to consider uncertainties in the data which provide both the model input and the output to which model predictions are compared. 

This chapter describes the main physical characteristics of the Ebro River, including the watershed orography, the biogeography and vegetation, the climatic and hydrological characteristics, and the soil type and biogeochemistry of river Ebro waters. The Ebro watershed has historically served as nucleus and connection for humans human settlements are known since pre-historic years and nowadays the river water chemistry cannot be understood without the anthropogenic effects. Therefore, the potential effects of human activities at the Ebro watershed are analyzed. 

The regulation of the Ebro River in the 1960s completed an irreversible change of the discharge pattern. The dams substantially altered flood timing, particularly of the flood peaks [26, 27]. Batalla et al. [28] analyzed flow records from 22 rivers to determine the effects of reservoirs on flow regime (flood frequency, flow duration of mean daily flows, monthly regime, and annual runoff) before and after dam construction. This research shows that variability of the mean daily flows was... 

---