Model General Rheological

The results of the latest research into helical flow of viscoplastic fluids (media characterized by ultimate stress or yield point ) have been systematized and reported most comprehensively in a recent preprint by Z. P. Schulman, V. N. Zad-vornyh, A. I. Litvinov 15). The authors have obtained a closed system of equations independent of a specific type of rheological model of the viscoplastic medium. The equations are represented in a criterion form and permit the calculation of the required characteristics of the helical flow of a specific fluid. For example, calculations have been performed with respect to generalized Schulman s model16) which represents adequately the behavior of various paint compoditions, drilling fluids, pulps, food masses, cement and clay suspensions and a number of other non-Newtonian media characterized by both pseudoplastic and dilatant properties. 

Transient behaviour of lyotropic MCLCPs is similar to that of thermotropic MCLCPs as discussed in Sect. 15.7 (Fig. 15.47). An example is given in Fig. 16.35 for PpPTA in sulphuric acid (Doppert and Picken, 1987). It shows damped oscillating behaviour, which is in contradistinction to conventional polymers, but which is also found as a result of simple rheological models, like the Jeffreys model (see Chap. 15). This behaviour turns out to be a general feature of lyotropic MCLCPs. The oscillatory behaviour is easier to measure for lyotropic than for thermotropic systems, where it is less pronounced. 

Estimation of Parameters. The resin viscosity, tj, as a function of time and/or temperature can be obtained using either a generalized dual-Arrhenius rheology model (Equation 5) or the thickness - time relationship for the neat resin from a separate squeeze-flow experiment (7). 

From a numerical viev point, rapid progress has been made in the last few years in studies generally devoted to the entry flow problem, together with the use of more and more realistic constitutive equations for the fluids. Consequently, more complexity was involved for the munerical problem, in relation to the nonlinearity induced by the rheological model in the governing equations. The use of nonlinear constitutive models required approximate methods for solving the equations, such as finite element techniques, even for isothermal and steady-state conditions related to a simple flow geometry. 

Ofoli, R. Y., Morgan, R. G., and Steffe, J. F. 1987. A generalized rheological model for inelastic fluid foods. J. Texture SUid. 18 213-230. 

In fact, Equation 5.281 describes an interface as a two-dimensional Newtonian fluid. On the other hand, a number of non-Newtonian interfacial rheological models have been described in the literature. Tambe and Sharma modeled the hydrodynamics of thin liquid films bounded by viscoelastic interfaces, which obey a generalized Maxwell model for the interfacial stress tensor. These authors also presented a constitutive equation to describe the rheological properties of fluid interfaces containing colloidal particles. A new constitutive equation for the total stress was proposed by Horozov et al. ° and Danov et al. who applied a local approach to the interfacial dilatation of adsorption layers. 

In the following we often consider a rheological model more general than (6.1.4). In the three-dimensional case, this model is described by Eq. (6.1.1), where the apparent viscosity fi arbitrarily depends on the quadratic invariant of the shear rate tensor,... 

An important class of non-Newtonian fluids is formed by isotropic rheological stable media whose stress tensor [ry] is a continuous function of the shear rate tensor [e,j] and is independent of the other kinematic and dynamic variables. One can rigorously prove that the most general rheological model satisfying these conditions is the following nonlinear model of a viscous non-Newtonian Stokes medium [19] ... 

A number of rheological models have been used to describe the rheology of drilling fluids (and non-Newtonian fluids in general) (8, 9, 65-67). These models, it is stressed, have been obtained purely empirically by fitting rasa function of y. A Newtonian fluid is characterized by... 

The analogous expressions for AP and yw for non-Newtonian fluids depend on the rheological model describing the fluid. The shear rate at the wall 7W is given by the Rabinowitsch-Mooney equation (86, 87), which in its general form is independent of the rheology of the fluid ... 

In this work are obtained generalized Reynolds and Hedstrom numbers connected with a three parameter rheological model to correlate the friction coefficient for the laminar, transitional and turbulent regime in annular flow. The use at experimental data covering a considerable range of dimensionless numbers for the flow of bentonite suspensions leads to a calculation technique for the transition velocity and pressure drop of these suspensions in annular geometries. 

Equations (6) and (8) are new definitions of the generalized Reynolds and Hedstrom numbers for the rheological model focused in this work. 

The utilization of a three-parameter rheological model to describe the rheology of clay suspensions conducted to a development of new dimensionless parameters named here as generalized Reynolds and Hedstrom numbers permits the analytical relationship between pressure drop and flow rates for the laminar flow in annular flow. 

In the very important case of non-Newtonian fluid flow, the viscosity p, which is defined in this paper, has to be replaced by the apparent viscosity of the generalized Newtonian fluid when it is possible (pseudoplastic, dilatant, or plastic fluids). This apparent viscosity is defined from the flow rheological model representing the fluid by = f(y). 

Most polymer processes are dominated by the shear strain rate. Consequently, the viscosity used to characterize the fluid is based on shear deformation measurement devices. The rheological models that are used for these types of flows are usually termed Generalized Newtonian Fluids (GNF). In a GNF model, the stress in a fluid is dependent on the second invariant of the stain rate tensor, which is approximated by the shear rate in most shear dominated flows. The temperature dependence of GNF fluids is generally included in the coefficients of the viscosity model. Various models are currently being used to represent the temperature and strain rate dependence of the viscosity. 

Many particular rheological models existing in the literature may be obtained by varying the number of elements in the generalized models mentioned above. 

Plane frame structures, treated as elastic systems with VE dampers, are modelled using the finite element method. A two-node bar element with six nodal parameters is used to describe the structure. The mass and stifihess matrices together with the vector of nodal forces of the element can be found in many sources. The equation of motion of a stmcture with VE dampers modelled using the generalized rheological models can be written in the following form ... 

The problem of optimal distribution of VE dampers modelled using the rheological models with flactional derivative or using the generalized classical rheological models is solved for the first time. 

Rheology in general addresses the response of materials to stresses applied in various ways. The main principle of rheology is the description of the mechanical properties of systans using simple idealized models containing a relatively small number of parameters. The simplest approach is the so-called quasi-steady-state regime, which involves a restriction on uniform shear and low deformation rates. 

As shown in Eqn. (6), the drag coefficient of a cylindrical fiber imder cross flow condition is a function of the Reynolds Number, which is generally expressed as Re = pUp,hd/p (i.e. the ratio of inertial force to viscous force). This definition holds true for Newtonian fluids, where shear stress < shear rate. However, the fluids that are often utilized in fiber sweep applications are non-Newtonian. Hence, the Reynolds Number must be redefined using the apparent viscosity function as Re = pUp>d/papp. The viscosity for Newtonian fluids is independent of the shear rate. However, for non-Newtonian fluids, the apparent viscosity varies with shear rate. Applying the Yield Power Law (YPL) rheology model, the apparent viscosity is expressed as ... 

Figure 2.16 lypical viscosity versus shear rate curve depicting the method for determining the parameters of the General Rheological ModeL rom Re 87.)... 

---