Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Retraction method, continued

This test has been criticized because it does not simulate actual building fire conditions [5,6], An additional problem with foamed samples is that the specimens either retract out of the reach of the flame or drip on to the floor of the tunnel. In Canada this has been addressed by using a downward-facing burner and mounting the specimens on the floor of the tunnel. Despite its limitations, the Steiner Tunnel method continues to be used to test and rate thermoplastic foams. [Pg.687]

As of the writing of this book, claims have been put forward for the creation of elements 112,114, 116, and 118, but none of these claims have been completely validated and the 2001 claim for the discovery of 118 was later retracted by the research team. IUPAC and IUPAP (the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics) continue to oversee and adjudicate claims and in 2003 released a Technical Report saying that although many of the claims were based on good science and sound methods, there was not yet enough independent confirmation to establish priority. In the case of these elements, it is probably just a matter of time before they are officially recognized. [Pg.109]

A knockout system is required to eject the part from the mold (see Chapter 7 Mold Design"). On most machines there is an adjustable stationary ejector plate containing ejector bars which go through the movable platen. As the mold closes, the ejector bars go through the holes in the back platen of the mold, contact, and stop the mold knockout plate. The rest of the mold continues to close to a predetermined distance and stops. A superior method to activate the knockout system is by use of hydraulic cylinders. This permits advancing or retracting the knockout system with any speed or force. This can be particularly useful in cam and insert molding. [Pg.266]

Place the four papers in one chromatography tank (of height 15 in. and base 11 in. x 8 in.) fitted with a retractable-rod assembly as described in the above method and containing a layer of eluent 1 0 to 1 -5 cm deep. Allow to equilibrate for not less than sixteen hours (overnight) with the rods retracted and then continue as described in the above method from push the rods downwards until 2 to 4 mm. . . down to the calculation of results, developing for seven and a half to eight hours. [Pg.341]


See other pages where Retraction method, continued is mentioned: [Pg.40]    [Pg.797]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.202]   


SEARCH



Continuation methods

Continuity method

Continuous methods

© 2024 chempedia.info