Retardation factor reversibility

There are various parameters and assumptions defining radionuclide behavior that are frequently part of model descriptions that require constraints. While these must generally be determined for each particular site, laboratory experiments must also be conducted to further define the range of possibilities and the operation of particular mechanisms. These include the reversibility of adsorption, the relative rates of radionuclide leaching, the rates of irreversible incorporation of sorbed nuclides, and the rates of precipitation when concentrations are above Th or U mineral solubility limits. A key issue is whether the recoil rates of radionuclides can be clearly related to the release rates of Rn the models are most useful for providing precise values for parameters such as retardation factors, and many values rely on a reliable value for the recoil fluxes, and this is always obtained from Rn groundwater activities. These values are only as well constrained as this assumption, which therefore must be bolstered by clearer evidence. 

The values of q are plotted as a function of the equilibrium concentration. For constituents at low or moderate concentrations, the relationship between q and C can be generated. If n = 1, the (q-C) relationship will be linear (Eq. 9), and the slope of the line (i.e.,ITd) defines the adsorption distribution of the pollutant. Kd is generally identified as the distribution or partition coefficient, and is used to describe pollutant partitioning between liquid and solids only if the reactions that cause the partitioning are fast and reversible, and if the isotherm is linear. For cases where the partitioning of the pollutants can be adequately described by the distribution coefficient (i. e.,fast and reversible adsorption, with linear isotherm), the retardation factor (R) of the subsurface environment can be used as follows ... 

So we deduce that only one DMB molecule out of 11 will be in the moving ground-water at any instant (Fig. 9.6). This result has implications for the fate of the DMB in that subsurface environment. If DMB sorptive exchange between the aquifer solids and the water is fast relative to the groundwater flow and if sorption is reversible, we can conclude that the whole population of DMB molecules moves at one-eleventh the rate of the water. The phenomenon of diminished chemical transport speed relative to the water seepage velocity is referred to as retardation. It is commonly discussed using the retardation factor, Rfi, which is simply equal to the reciprocal of the fraction of molecules capable of moving with the flow at any instant, ff (see Chapter 25). 

Reduced parameters, 66-69 Refractive index (RI) detector, 206-207 Regular solution, 49 Relative retention, 20-21, 22, 77 Repeatability, see Precision Reproducibility, see Precision Resolution, 17-19, 55 Response factors (detector), 104, 125 Response time, 94 Retardation factor, Rf, 71 Retention index of Kovats, 78 Retention ratio, 11, 12, 71 Retention time, 6, 9 Retention volume, 9, 75 adjusted, 10, 75 corrected, 62-63, 75 net, 63, 75 specific, 110 Reverse phase LC, 158 Rohrschneider/McReynolds constants, 137-140... 

System assumptions that should be valid for such applications include fluid flow in the porous media is isotropic and adsorption is fast, reversible, and linear (cf. Freeze and Cherry 1979). Given these constraints, the comparative transport of a conserved (nonadsorbed) tracer, such as Br , and an adsorbed or retarded species, such as Am, can be described as shown in Fig. 10.29. A comparison of migration distances of the two species after time t, is made at concentrations where C(measured)/Co(initial) = 0.5 for the conserved and adsorbed species. The migration distance X of the conserved species after time r is a measure of the average groundwater velocity (U), or X = vt. Similarly, the migration distance of the adsorbed species (X,) i related to its velocity of movement (v ) by Xf = vj. The retardation factor (/tj for the adsorbed species is then given by... 

The reverse flux of fluid from the interstitial to the vascular space (14) is caused by increased interstitial fluid pressure (12) and increased plasma protein concentration (oncotic pressure), hyperosmotemia, or both depending upon the intensity (above or below 50 -peak capacity) and duration of the exercise. Increased interstitial hydrostatic pressure and increased plasma osmotic pressures retard the fluid shift from plasma to the interstitium. Equilibrium is reached when interstitial pressure balances capillary filtration pressure (24). After cessation of exercise, restitution of plasma volume takes 40-60 minutes (21,22) unless significant dehydration is present. The immediate post-exercise hyperosmotemia, the relative hyperproteinemia, and the reduction in systemic blood pressure contribute to the restoration of plasma volume. The reduction in blood pressure, which produces a fall in local hydrostatic pressure within the capillaries of the previously active muscle, is probably the single most important factor. 

---