Residuals linear regression

Residual error in linear regression, where the filled circle shows the experimental value/, and the open circle shows the predicted value/,. 

A linear regression analysis should not be accepted without evaluating the validity of the model on which the calculations were based. Perhaps the simplest way to evaluate a regression analysis is to calculate and plot the residual error for each value of x. The residual error for a single calibration standard, r , is given as... 

Application of IP and NCS in conjunction with specification tolerance limits enables to substantiate acceptance criteria for linear regression metrological characteristics (residual standard deviation, correlation coefficient, y-intercept), accuracy and repeatability. Acceptance criteria for impurity influence (in spectrophotometric assay), solution stability and intermediate precision are substantiated as well. 

A non-linear regression analysis is employed using die Solver in Microsoft Excel spreadsheet to determine die values of and in die following examples. Example 1-5 (Chapter 1) involves the enzymatic reaction in the conversion of urea to ammonia and carbon dioxide and Example 11-1 deals with the interconversion of D-glyceraldehyde 3-Phosphate and dihydroxyacetone phosphate. The Solver (EXAMPLEll-l.xls and EXAMPLEll-3.xls) uses the Michaehs-Menten (MM) formula to compute v i- The residual sums of squares between Vg(,j, and v j is then calculated. Using guessed values of and the Solver uses a search optimization technique to determine MM parameters. The values of and in Example 11-1 are ... 

Figure 2.4. Graph of the linear regression line and data points (left), and the residuals (right). The fifty-fold magnification of the right panel is indicated the digital resolution 1 mAU of a typical UV-spectrophotometer is illustrated by the steps.

Figure 4.21. Residuals for linear (left) and quadratic (right) regressions the ordinates are scaled +20 mAU. Note the increase in variance toward higher concentrations (heteroscedacity). The gray line was plotted as the difference between the quadratic and the linear regression curves. Concentration scale 0-25 /ag/ml, final dilution.

Calibration Each of the solutions is injected once and a linear regression is calculated for the five equidistant points, yielding, for example, Y = -0.00064 + 1.004 X, = 0.9999. Under the assumption that the software did not truncate the result, an r of this size implies a residual standard deviation of better than 0.0001 (-0.5% CV in the middle of the LO range use program SIMCAL to confirm this statement ) the calibration results are not shown in Fig. 4.39. 

Testing the adequacy of a model with respect to its complexity by visually checking for trends in the residuals, e.g., is a linear regression sufficient, or is a quadratic polynomial necessary ... 

The next step requires the determination of the residual concentrations C by subtracting from the observed Cp. The resulting a-phase function is again obtained by means of linear regression on the earlier part of the time course of the logarithmic plasma concentration (Fig. 39.13b) ... 

The residual a-phase concentrations C are shown in the semilogarithmic plot of Fig. 39.13b. Least-squares linear regression of log C upon time produced 1.524 and -0.02408 for the intercept log and the slope respectively. 

The soil residue level is determined from the relative responses of the analytes to the internal standards. A five-point calibration curve is analyzed in triplicate, and the data are analyzed by a weighted 1 /x linear regression model. The calculated slope and intercept from the linear regression are used to calculate the residue levels in the soil samples. A 20% aliquot of the sample extract receives 10 ng of each internal standard... 

Perform a 1/x weighted linear regression analysis of relative response versus standard concentration in ng per 5 ng of internal standard. Calculate the slope and intercept values from the regression analysis. Use the following equation to determine the residue levels in the sample ... 

Run a set of standards of four or more concentration levels covering the expected range of residues. Generate a calibration curve for each analyte and obtain a linear regression with a correlation coefficient of at least 0.90 for each analyte. Do not use any sample run data if the combined regression for the standards run immediately before, during and after the samples does not meet this criterion. 

Calibration curves generated for each analyte from the chromatographic standards should be linear (correlation coefficient R > 0.99) with negligible intercepts so that either linear regression or a response factor method may be used for residue calculations. 

Famoxadone, IN-JS940, and IN-KZ007 residues are measured in soil (p-g kg ), sediment (p-gkg ), and water (pgL ). Quantification is based on analyte response in calibration standards and sample extract analyses determined as pg mL Calibration standard runs are analyzed before and after every 1 samples in each analytical set. Analyte quantification is based on (1) linear regression analysis of (y-axis) analyte concentration (lagmL Q and (x-axis) analyte peak area response or (2) the average response factor determined from the appropriate calibration standards. The SLOPE and INTERCEPT functions of Microsoft Excel are used to determine slope and intercept. The AVERAGE and STDEV functions of Microsoft Excel are used to determine average response factors and standard deviations. 

For the basic evaluation of a linear calibration line, several parameters can be used, such as the relative process standard deviation value (Vxc), the Mandel-test, the Xp value [28], the plot of response factor against concentration, the residual plot, or the analysis of variance (ANOVA). The lowest concentration that has been used for the calibration curve should not be less than the value of Xp (see Fig. 4). Vxo (in units of %) and Xp values of the linear regression line Y = a + bX can be calculated using the following equations [28] ... 

FDA/ICH recommendation Linear regression with report of slope, intercept, correlation coefficient, and residual sum of squares Objective Can be computerized Uses standard statistics Doesn t work as a test of linearity... 

Residuals. These are what remain of a set of data after a fitted model (such as a linear regression) or some similar level of analysis has been removed. 

Non-linear regression calculations are extensively used in most sciences. The goals are very similar to the ones discussed in the previous chapter on Linear Regression. Now, however, the function describing the measured data is non-linear and as a consequence, instead of an explicit equation for the computation of the best parameters, we have to develop iterative procedures. Starting from initial guesses for the parameters, these are iteratively improved or fitted, i.e. those parameters are determined that result in the optimal fit, or, in other words, that result in the minimal sum of squares of the residuals. 

The task is to compute the best parameter shift vector 8p that minimises the new residuals r(p+8p) in the least-squares sense. This is a linear regression equation with the explicit solution. 

FIGURE 4.8 Examples of residual plots from linear regression. In the upper left plot, the residuals are randomly scattered around 0 (eventually normally distributed) and fulfill a requirement of OLS. The upper right plot shows heteroscedasticity because the residuals increase with y (and thus they also depend on x). The lower plot indicates a nonlinear relationship between x and y. 

The transformed response values were regressed on the transformed amount values using the simple linear regression model and ordinary least squares estimation. The standard deviation of the response values (about the regression line) was calculated, and plots were formed of the transformed response values and of the residuals versus transformed amounts. 

Further analysis of linearity data typically involves inspection of residuals for fit in the linear regression form and to verify that the distribution of data points around the line is random. Random distribution of residuals is ideal however, non-random patterns may exist. Depending on the distribution of the pattern seen in a plot of residuals, the results may uncover non-ideal conditions within the separation that may then help define the range of the method or indicate areas in which further development is required. An example of residual plot is shown in Figure 36. There was no apparent trend across injection linearity range. 

---