Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Repulsive Index

The force of repulsion between like-charged particles manifests itself because of the hydration (osmotic potential) of the counter ions present in the double layer in relation [Pg.374]

Only the ionic strength is variable if temperature remains constant. Therefore, [Pg.376]

From data representing the water chemistry of several lakes and sedimentation ponds, approximating water chemistry of many sedimentation ponds throughout the eastern U.S. humid region (Bucek, 1981), the relationship (Evangelou and Garyotis, 1985) [Pg.376]

Based on the above, a RI-SS relationship representing a particular colloidal system would be constant, assuming that pH is constant, because the RI-SS relationship is expected to be pH dependent. Furthermore, at a certain pH value, a colloidal system that exhibits both negative and positive surface potential would be expected to coflocculate when the net electrical potential is zero or the system is at its PZC (Schofield and Samson, 1953 Quirk and Schofield, 1955 Evangelou and Garyotis, 1985). Under these conditions, the settling characteristics of the suspended solids would be independent of RI (Fig. 9.14a and b). [Pg.378]

Equation 9.10 does not make any distinction between different electrolytes. In other words, Equation 9.10 implies that two suspension systems with similar clay minerals and the same ionic strength should exhibit identical clay-settling behavior, even if one solution consists of NaCl and the other of CaCl2, However, this is not valid because it [Pg.378]


Figure 9.13. Relationship between flocculation after a 90-min settling period and repulsive index (RI) of four selected samples (from Evangelou, 1990, with permission). Figure 9.13. Relationship between flocculation after a 90-min settling period and repulsive index (RI) of four selected samples (from Evangelou, 1990, with permission).
Geometric-mean combining rules for both 12 and a have also been proposed by Calvin and Reed who use a Mie ( , 6) potential and treat the repulsive index n as an additional parameter. For the unlike interaction the geometric mean is also used for n. They have also suggested similar rules for the three parameters in the exp-6 potential. Kong has proposed combination rules involving the elfective number of outer-shell electrons. [Pg.216]

IlyperChem uses 16 bytes (two double-precision words) of storage for each electron repulsion integral. The first 8 bytes save thecom-pressed four indices and the second S bytes store the value of the integral. Each index lakes 16 bits. Thus the maximum number of basis fiinctions is 65,535. This should satisfy all users of IlyperChem for the foreseeable future. [Pg.263]

The first summation requires electron repulsion integrals with four virtuaJ indices. Efficient algorithms that avoid the storage of these integrals have been discussed in detail [20]. For every orbital index, p, this OV contraction must be repeated for each energy considered in the pole search it is usually the computational bottleneck. [Pg.42]

Figure 9. Determination of the first electron affinity, and the first and higher ionization potentials of formyl radical from the SCF orbital energies and electronic repulsion integrals, and K,j (cf. eqs. (90), (92), and (93)). The experimental value (112), 9.88 eV, for the first ionization potential corresponds to the theoretical value I . All entries are given in eV. With A and I a lower index stands for MO the upper one indicates the state multiplicity after ionization. Figure 9. Determination of the first electron affinity, and the first and higher ionization potentials of formyl radical from the SCF orbital energies and electronic repulsion integrals, and K,j (cf. eqs. (90), (92), and (93)). The experimental value (112), 9.88 eV, for the first ionization potential corresponds to the theoretical value I . All entries are given in eV. With A and I a lower index stands for MO the upper one indicates the state multiplicity after ionization.
Here the indices a and b stand for the valence orbitals on the two atoms as before, n is a number operator, c+ and c are creation and annihilation operators, and cr is the spin index. The third and fourth terms in the parentheses effect electron exchange and are responsible for the bonding between the two atoms, while the last two terms stand for the Coulomb repulsion between electrons of opposite spin on the same orbital. As is common in tight binding theory, we assume that the two orbitals a and b are orthogonal we shall correct for this neglect of overlap later. The coupling Vab can be taken as real we set Vab = P < 0. [Pg.49]

Voltammetry curves for all three low-index surfaces are given in Fig. 1. Hydrogen adsorption at Pt(lll), the process at -0.25 < E < -0.05 V in Fig. 1, is not affected by the nature of the anion (such as SO 2-, CIO.- or F-) (12). The lack of a well defined peak, in the drawn-out curve of Fig. 1 clearly indicates a strong lateral repulsion between adsorbed hydrogen adatoms. This is probably a consequence of a partially charge on the adsorbed hydrogen adatoms which, in turn, does not allow the... [Pg.498]

Finally, we should establish some index of steric repulsion since in certain instances it may not be immediately obvious which of two isomers is more destabilized by steric effects. The most convenient index is the nuclear repulsion energy, En, which can be calculated readily for any molecular system0. ... [Pg.48]

This order of stability is reflected in the nuclear repulsion energy, which constitutes an index of steric effects , as shown below ... [Pg.72]

Diagonal matrix elements of the P3 self-energy approximation may be expressed in terms of canonical Hartree-Fock orbital energies and electron repulsion integrals in this basis. For ionization energies, where the index p pertains to an occupied spinorbital in the Hartree-Fock determinant,... [Pg.136]

The first simplification in the TDAN model is to consider only a few electronic orbitals on the scattered atom. For many applications, it is sufficient to consider one only, that from which, or into which, an electron is transferred. Let the ket 10 > denote the spatial part of the orbital. When far from the surface, suppose its energy is So> let Uq be the Coulomb repulsion integral associated with the energy change when it is occupied by two electrons of opposite spin. In terms of creation and annihilation operators and Co for 0>, with ff( = aorfi)a spin index, that part ofJt which refers to the free atom is... [Pg.339]

We can, however, make some semi-quantitative comments about the type of van der Waals forces we expect from the main absorption peaks and the refractive index of transparent dielectrics. For example, if two dielectric bodies which interact through vacuum have very similar absorption spectra, the van der Waals attraction will be strong. Also, if the intervening medium has a spectrum similar to that of the interacting bodies the attraction will be weak (and can even be repulsive). [Pg.139]

It is not necessary to restrict ourselves to bonds that are described by Morse potentials. We can regard eqn. (56) as a quadratic equation in x, use any form of the potential energy V(R) with the usual shape (i.e., a minimum, a repulsive barrier at short distances, and a monotonical increase at large distances), and determine x to get another definition of the bond order. This is called the unity bond index quadratic exponential potential (UBI QEP) method by Shustor-ovich and Sellers. ... [Pg.145]

There are two types of solute-solvent interactions which affect absorption and emission spectra. These are universal interaction and specific interaction. The universal interaction is due to the collective influence of the solvent as a dielectric medium and depends on the dielectric constant D and the refractive index n of the solvent. Thus large environmental perturbations may be caused by van der Waals dipolar or ionic fields in solution, liquids and in solids. The van der Waals interactions include (i) London dispersion force, (ii) induced dipole interactions, and (iii) dipole-dipole interactions. These are attractive interactions. The repulsive interactions are primarily derived from exchange forces (non bonded repulsion) as the elctrons of one molecule approach the filled orbitals of the neighbour. If the solute molecule has a dipole moment, it is expected to differ in various electronic energy states because of the differences in charge distribution. In polar solvents dipole-dipole inrteractions are important. [Pg.66]


See other pages where Repulsive Index is mentioned: [Pg.374]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.747]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.51]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info