Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Repulsion potential Subject

Because dispersion and repulsion potentials between two partners fall off so rapidly with distance the binding energy depends very much upon the shape of the surface. For example, a molecule bound at the centre of a hemispherical cavity of radius Zq (Fig. 13a) is subject to a dispersion potential 4 times as great as for a molecule located on a smooth surface [31]. Inside a long, narrow capillary, terminated by a hemisphere at whose centre the molecule is located (Fig. 13b) the attractive potential is roughly 7 times that of a plane surface [31]. Inside a topographic depression a bound molecule is in close contact with a larger number of atoms than on a smooth surface. [Pg.46]

The local-density approximation describes the electronic many-body system in terms of a single-particle-like Schrddinger equation for each occupied state In the system. The electrons are, besides external nuclear Coulomb potentials, subjected to Coulomb repulsion from the other electrons (Hartree potential) and to exchange and correlation (x-c) potentials. The latter describe the interaction of each electron with its own surrounding x-c hole (see, e.g., von Barth and Williams, 1983). [Pg.315]

Schematic view of an electron travelling along the field direction in an ID system where a fraction x of the hopping sites carries a repulsive potential which a carrier has overcome either thermally or via tunnelling. Barriers are subject to a statistical distribution leading to a distribution p(W) of barrier crossing rates. Schematic view of an electron travelling along the field direction in an ID system where a fraction x of the hopping sites carries a repulsive potential which a carrier has overcome either thermally or via tunnelling. Barriers are subject to a statistical distribution leading to a distribution p(W) of barrier crossing rates.
As the distance between the two particles varies, they are subject to these long-range r " attractive forces (which some authors refer to collectively as van der Waals forces). Upon very close approach they will experience a repulsive force due to electron-electron repulsion. This repulsive interaction is not theoretically well characterized, and it is usually approximated by an empirical reciprocal power of distance of separation. The net potential energy is then a balance of the attractive and repulsive components, often described by Eq. (8-16), the Lennard-Jones 6-12 potential. [Pg.393]

The second important approximation that enables the resolution of Eq. (1.6) consists in considering that every electron is subject to an effective interaction potential V(ri), which takes into account the full attractive electron-ion interactions as well as somehow a part of the repulsive electron-electron interactions. Ideally we would like to express Hq in the form ... [Pg.57]

We turn now to theories of ionic criticality that encompass nonclassical phenomena. Mean-field-like criticality of ionic fluids was debated in 1972 [30] and according to a remark by Friedman in this discussion [69], this subject seems to have attracted attention in 1963. Arguments in favor of a mean-field criticality of ionic systems, at least in part, seem to go back to the work of Kac et al. [288], who showed in 1962 that in D = 1 classical van der Waals behavior is obtained for a potential of the form ionic fluids with attractive and repulsive Coulombic interactions have little in common with the simple Kac fluid. [Pg.48]

The rate of deposition of Brownian particles is predicted by taking into account the effects of diffusion and convection of single particles and interaction forces between particles and collector [2.1] -[2.6]. It is demonstrated that the interaction forces can be incorporated into a boundary condition that has the form of a first order chemical reaction which takes place on the collector [2.1], and an expression is derived for the rate constant The rate of deposition is obtained by solving the convective diffusion equation subject to that boundary condition. The procedure developed for deposition is extended to the case when both deposition and desorption occur. In the latter case, the interaction potential contains the Bom repulsion, in addition to the London and double-layer interactions [2.2]-[2.7]. Paper [2.7] differs from [2.2] because it considers the deposition at both primary and secondary minima. Papers [2.8], [2.9] and [2.10] treat the deposition of cancer cells or platelets on surfaces. [Pg.68]


See other pages where Repulsion potential Subject is mentioned: [Pg.862]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.862]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.4814]    [Pg.575]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.1710]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.1061]    [Pg.1328]   


SEARCH



Repulsion potential

Repulsive potential

Subject potential

© 2024 chempedia.info