Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Release of constraint

There are in fact two additional processes for relaxation which are quite natural to consider. One is the renewal of conformation by release of constraints which confine each chain, arising from diffusion of the surrounding chains which supply the con-straints This constraint release mechanism would operate in liquids, where the obstacles are themselves parts of reptating chains, but not in a network. [Pg.71]

Effects of the first factor, release of constraints by retraction during the equilibration period, can be estimated with the bond flip model as long as the strain is not too large. The average frequency of retraction-induced jumps per chain during equilibration is... [Pg.104]

Some of the stress relaxed at time scale rs occurs by release of constraints imposed on long chains by short ones, which makes a significant contribution to the stress relaxation at the reptation time of the short chains ts. [Pg.390]

The release of constraint that results from cavitation in the matrix or void formation in the rubber particles [BucknaU, 1988 Young, 1988]. [Pg.881]

All of these events can be ascribed to the release of constraints imposed on non-bilayer lipids to maintain them in a bilayer phase required to achieve a stable membrane structure. Exposure to high temperatures serves to phase separate the non-bilayer lipids into discrete domains that appear to be devoid of membrane proteins. It is likely also that the permeability barrier properties are altered by this type of phase separation. In general, where gross non-bilayer phase separations have taken place it is difficult to imagine how the normal distribution of membrane components can be achieved and especially at a rate that would be consistent with the continued survival of the cell. [Pg.514]

For a more transparent interpretation of irreversible processes, consider an entropy transfer from the reservoir to the system the examination of the opposite case is left as an exercise. We rewrite Eq. (1.9.1c) in the form dS T, V, tii) — dbSo To, Vq, noO — d0 = 0, or as dS T, V, rii) = Idb-SoCTo, Vo, oi) + d, with 7b > T. This shows that the total entropy increase of the system (the left-hand side) consists of what is reversibly transferred out of the reservoir (recall the assumption that all reservoir processes are executed reversibly) plus what is irreversibly generated internally by the release of constraints. The latter events are beyond the control of the experimenter and are not transferred across the boimdaries of the system. It is only when no such processes take place that the entropy increase in the system is matched by the corresponding entropy decrease in the surroundings at the common temperature T. [Pg.59]

Here, the effect of a very large, or in the present model infinite, transverse friction coefficient is to retard the lateral diffusion over length scales larger than the mean spacing between entanglements. Additional non-reptative processes, such as the release of constraints, can lead to transverse diffusion for p < p. These effects can be included in this model by modifying Eq. (73) appropriately. [Pg.445]

M. Rubinstein (Eastman Kodak Company) In the des Cloizeaux double reptation model which is similar to the Marrucci Viovy model, it is assumed that a release of constraint chain A imposes on chain B when chain A reptates away completely relaxes the stress in that region for both chains. This would imply that for a homopolymer binary blend of long and short chains would be completely relaxed after each of these K entanglements is released only once. But if an entanglement is released, another one is formed nearby. I believe that to completely relax this section one needs disentanglement events and that the Verdier-Stockmayer flip-bond model or the Rouse model is needed to describe the motion and relaxation of the primitive path due to the constraint release process, as was proposed by Prof, de Gennes, J. Klein, Daoud, G. de Bennes and Graessley and used recently by many other scientists. The fact that double reptation is an oversimplification of the constraint release process has been confirmed by experiments. [Pg.499]

Testing of SCF wavefunctions for stability under release of constraints for Hartree-Fock and DFT methods. Analytic geometry optimizations to minima and saddle points using UHF, ROHF, GVB-PP, CASSCF, MP2, MP3, MP4(SDQ), CID, CISD, CCD, QCISD, DFT, and Cl-Singles wavefunctions. Numerical optimizations are also available for other methods. [Pg.3309]

Now, release the constraint of having the first layer still oriented at a. That constraint must surely seem quite arbitrary and not at all physically reasonable. Also, we must admit that the second layer probably is not in its proper orientation either. Thus, we will allow the two laminae orientations to float from [01/02 to something else. And we will call that procedure for changing the laminae lamina reorientation. There are two stages of lamina reorientation (1) coarse reorientation and (2) fine reorientation. [Pg.436]

In the HF scheme, the first origin of the correlation between electrons of antiparallel spins comes from the restriction that they are forced to occupy the same orbital (RHF scheme) and thus some of the same location in space. A simple way of taking into account the basic effects of the electronic correlation is to release the constraint of double occupation (UHF scheme = Unrestricted HF) and so use Different Orbitals for Different Spins (DODS scheme which is the European way of calling UHF). In this methodology, electrons with antiparallel spins are not found to doubly occupy the same orbital so that, in principle, they are not forced to coexist in the same spatial region as is the case in usual RHF wave functions. [Pg.192]

Here, we define the total dissolved solids (in mg kg-1) for early releases of the REACT program (GWB 6.0 and previous), so the software can correctly convert our input constraints from mg kg-1 to molal units, as carried internally (i.e., variables nii and m.j). The print command causes the program to list in the output all of the aqueous species, not just those in greatest concentration. Typing go triggers the model to begin calculations and write its results to the output dataset. [Pg.84]

A second appealing feature of tube model theories is that they provide a natural hierarchy of effects which one can incorporate or ignore at will in a calculation, depending on the accuracy desired. We will see how, in the case of linear polymers, bare reptation in a fixed tube provides a first-order calculation more accurate levels of the theory may incorporate the co-operative effects of constraint release and further refinements such as path-length fluctuation via the Rouse modes of the chains. [Pg.202]

The approximate treatment described above accounts rather well for the linear rheology of star polymer melts. In fact it has been remarked that the case for the tube model draws its real strength from the results for star polymers rather than for linear chains, where the problems of constraint release and breathing modes are harder to account for (but see Sect. 3.2.4.). However, there are still some outstanding issues and questions ... [Pg.218]

Rubinstein has constructed on a reptation-fluctuation approach a detailed self-consistent theory of constraint release, allowing each loss of entanglement in one chain to permit a random jump in the tube of another [37]. When this is done the form of predicted relaxation functions are in good accord with experiments. However, in monodisperse linear melts it appears that the fluctuation contribution is more important than constraint release. [Pg.224]

Karges, B., Krause, G., Homoki, J., Debatin, K. M., de, R. N., and Karges, W. (2005) TSH receptor mutation V509A causes familial hyperthyroidism by release of interhelical constraints between transmembrane helices TMH3 and TMH5. J. Endocrinol. 186, 311-3S5. [Pg.132]

Here also, the combined electron release of the five phenoxy substituents along with the steric constraints of the substrate N3P3(OPh)5CI allow the reaction to proceed by a SnI pathway. The increased amounts of geminal isomers at higher substitution stages with primary amines is probably due to the predominance of the SnI(CB) pathway. [Pg.51]

The final protein product has two hydrazone bonds. If the middle section (residues 63-75) is synthesized according to the natural sequence, the reassembled protein with two unreduced hydrazone bonds has a biological activity relative to the starting cytokine of roughly 1/1000. With one of the two bonds reduced the activity is 1/100 or 1/50 of the native sequence, depending on which bond is involved. With both bonds reduced the activity is a little less than that of the starting cytokine, but not to a statistically significant extent. This improvement of activity on reduction is doubtless due to the release of the rotation constraint around the N C bond. [Pg.85]

What does all of the above analysis teach us First and above ail, the correct LR behavior at the FEG limit is vital for design of a good EDF. Second, proper sum rules should be satisfied to build in systematic error cancellation. Third, the introduction of a weight function releases the constraints on the original formulas at the FEG limit, allows any nonlocal effects to be modeled, and somewhat more importantly, provides a new degree of freedom so that other restrictions can be simultaneously satisfied. Fourth, any recursion should be avoided to permit more efficient implementation. This in turn calls for a better understanding of the TBFWV. Finally, the O(M ) numerical barrier must be overcome so that any general application will be possible. [Pg.146]

In double-stranded DNA, electron abstraction from the guanine radical cation can be associated with an extremely fast shift of the N1 proton to its Watson-Crick partner cytosine (Scheme 2a) [9]. The equilibrium constant for the protonation of C (pfCa=4.3) with the concomitant deprotonation of G estimated from the pK values of the free nucleosides, is about 2.5 [49]. Within these constraints, the guanine radical should retain some radical cation character [82] and the complete deprotonation of G would require a base pair opening event occurring on a millisecond timescale [74]. An alternative mechanism of G deprotonation is the release of the N2 proton (Scheme 2b). This mechanism was experimentally established for 1-methyl-guanosine conductometric results showed that in neutral solutions, the radical cation of this nucleoside rapidly deprotonates with the formation of the neutral radical [48]. Although the exact mechanism of the G deprotonation in double-stranded DNA requires further clarification, electron abstraction... [Pg.147]


See other pages where Release of constraint is mentioned: [Pg.196]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.78]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.499 ]




SEARCH



Constraint release

© 2024 chempedia.info