Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Relaxation time, spin-lattice thermal

Since the magnetic moments are smaller, now we have a smaller susceptibility and therefore much smaller signal, requiring more sensitive detection systems. These are resonance or SQUID (see Section 14.5) techniques. Thermal response time are shorter, since pure metals can be used with good thermal conductivity and fast spin-lattice relaxation. The parameter to be measured is the nuclear susceptibility ... [Pg.234]

Assuming that the lattice can, on the time scale relevant for the evolution of the nuclear spin density operator, be considered to remain in thermal equilibrium, a = a, and applying the Redfield theory to the nuclear spin sub-system allows us to obtain the following expressions for nuclear spin-lattice and spin spin relaxation rates ... [Pg.62]

The most important relaxation processes in NMR involve interactions with other nuclear spins that are in the state of random thermal motion. This is called spin-lattice relaxation and results in a simple exponential recovery process after the spins are disturbed in an NMR experiment. The exponential recovery is characterised by a time constant Tj that can be measured for different types of nuclei. For organic liquids and samples in solution, Tj is typically of the order of several seconds. In the presence of paramagnetic impurities or in very viscous solvents, relaxation of the spins can be very efficient and NMR spectra obtained become broad. [Pg.36]

Cross-polarization is based on the notion that the vast proton spin system can be tapped to provide some carbon polarization more conveniently than by thermalization with the lattice (7). Advantages are two-fold the carbon signal (from those C nuclei which are indeed in contact with protons) is enhanced and, more importantly, the experiment can be repeated at a rate determined by the proton longitudinal relaxation time Tin, rather than by the carbon T c (I)- There are many variants (7) of crosspolarization and only two common ones are described below (12,20). [Pg.70]

Two-proton transfer in crystals of carboxylic acids has been studied thoroughly by the 7 -NMR and IINS methods. The proton spin-lattice relaxation time, measured by T,-NMR, is associated with the potential asymmetry A, induced by the crystalline field. The rate constant of thermally activated hopping between the acid monomers can be found from Tj using the theory of spin exchange [Look and Lowe, 1966] ... [Pg.179]

NMR spectrum depends on the type of starch (amylose-to-amylopectin ratio) and is associated with the numbers of carbon atoms in the branching points and thermal glucose units. Tables X and XI present 13C spin-lattice relaxation times (Tus) and nuclear Overhauser enhancement (n.O.e) for l3C nuclei of starches of various origins. Figure 21 shows H NMR spectra of amylose and a high-amylopectin waxy sorghum starch. [Pg.288]

The final ESR property to discuss is the spin-lattice relaxation time 7, which is the time taken for the spin excitation to return to the ground state, dissipating its energy into the thermal bath of network vibrations. Fig. 4.14 shows the temperature dependence of 7] for the g = 2.0055... [Pg.112]

With temperature increase from T = 1.2 K to T > 5 K, the decay behavior changes drastically. At T = 5 K, the decay is already monoexponential with a decay time of r(5 K) = (230 10) ps (Plot (b) of Fig. 6). Within limits of experimental error this value is constant at least up to T = 40 K [57]. Obviously, temperature increase induces an efficient spin-lattice relaxation between the three triplet substates. This leads to a fast thermalization. The observed monoexponential decay demonstrates that the sir is much faster than the shortest emission decay component. [Pg.104]

The results discussed above have shown that time-resolved emission spectroscopy can provide detailed insight into vibronic deactivation paths of triplet substates, even when the zero-field splitting is one order of magnitude smaller than the obtainable spectral resolution (= 2 cm ). This is possible at low temperature (1.3 K), because the triplet sublevels emit independently. They are not in a thermal equilibrium due to the very small rates of spin-lattice relaxation between these substates. In the next section, we return to this interesting property by applying the complementary methods of ODMR and PMDR spectroscopy to the same set of triplet substates. [Pg.108]


See other pages where Relaxation time, spin-lattice thermal is mentioned: [Pg.197]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.714]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.99]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.38 , Pg.43 ]




SEARCH



Relaxation thermalization

Relaxation times spin-lattice

Spin lattice

Spin-lattice relaxation

Spin-relaxation times

Thermal relaxation

Time thermal

© 2024 chempedia.info