Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Relations Between Physical Observables

In physics and chemistry, many quantities are directly related by differentiation. We will give only a few examples here  [Pg.24]

1A must-read for any science student—it is the autobiography of Richard Feynmann, Nobel laureate in Physics and one of the most interesting personalities in twentieth century science. [Pg.24]


It is important to understand the conceptual difference between the quantities E and S in Eqs (1.161) and (1.15 8), and the corresponding quantities in Eq. (1.149). In the microcanonical case E, S, and the other derived quantities (P, T, /.i are unique numbers. In the canonical case these, except for T which is defined by the external bath, are ensemble averages. Even T as defined by Eq. (1.151) is not the same as T in the canonical ensemble. Equation (1.151) defines a temperature for a closed equilibrium system of a given total energy while as just said, in the canonical ensemble T is determined by the external bath. For macroscopic observations we often disregard the difference between average quantities that characterize a system open to its environment and the deterministic values of these parameters in the equivalent closed system. Note however that fluctuations from the average are themselves often related to physical observables and should be discussed within their proper ensemble. [Pg.32]

By the use of a variety of polarographic and allied techniques, reaction half-times down to about 10 s can be studied, and a recent technique, known as high level Faradaic rectification extends this range to about 10 s. However, there are some problems in interpreting kinetic results for proton-transfer reactions derived from electrochemical studies. In the first place, the relation between the observed quantities and chemical rate constants is a complicated one, and its derivation usually involves physical or mathematical approximations and corrections. Secondly, the informa-... [Pg.118]

Qualitative and quantitative relations between enthalpy and entropy were observed several times in the 1920 s, and their importance was rightly recognized by some authors. However, some ideas from this early work seem to have been overlooked later, perhaps because they were connected with obsolete theories or because they were developed independently in the fields of organic chemistry, catalysis, and pure physical chemistry. For this reason, a brief historical survey seems appropriate. [Pg.417]

The existence of an approximate relation between the average number of stable intermediate phases in a binary system and the calculated extreme values of the enthalpies of formation was also suggested (see Fig. 2.7). Although the way to predict formation enthalpies of alloys was introduced as an empirical one and several discrepancies may be noticed between calculated and measured values, it is important to observe that the model incorporates basic physics. [Pg.19]

Equation (21) already has the form of a fluctuation theorem. However, in order to get a proper flucmation theorem we need to specify relations between probabilities for physically measurable observables rather than paths. From Eq. (21) it is straightforward to derive a fluctuation theorem for the total dissipation S. Let us take b C) = With this choice we get... [Pg.48]

Relation of Physical Properties and Chemical Constitution was the title of a book published in 1920 by Kauffmann 20). It lists the freezing and boiling points of the normal paraffins and records the increments of rise with the addition of each methylene group. The same year Thomas Midgley 26) observed wide differences in the combustion of fuels in internal combustion engines. The differences were found not only in different classes of hydrocarbons but also between isomeric hydrocarbons of the same class. [Pg.355]

Relation between nature of the medium and rate of reaction. Very slight changes in the nature of the medium greatly affect the rale of a chemical reaction, but attempts to relate any physical properly of a solvent with the effect observed on the rale of a given reaelion appear to have proved unsuccessful. [Pg.352]

The form of distribution (17) recalls a Boltzmann expression with modulus of distribution 7. Attempts at a direct physical explanation of this result are thwarted by the obvious dependence of 7, not only on the state of the surface, but also on the nature of the gas whose adsorption proceeds according to equation (1). Nevertheless, formula (17) makes very plausible the experimentally observed constancy of the functional dependence A(Q) itself which leads to equation (1). It seems natural that with training or sintering of the surface, the liberation or destruction of points with different heats of adsorption may proceed in such a way as to preserve the exponential relation between A and Q, changing only the constants D, Q0, and especially 7. [Pg.63]

However for a specific inflationary model, the four observable quantities As, At, ns and nj can be expressed at lowest order in term of the physical quantities 14 and the two slow-roll parameters < /,. and 5k, so that there exist some consistency relations (between the tensor spectral index and the scalar-to-tensor ratio), which in principle allow to test inflation, and to reconstruct the potential on a small region (as we can have access to V as well as V and V" with the slow roll parameters). Note however that this consistency relation crucially relies on the detection of the tensor modes (and hence, on the H-polarization of CMB as it is probably the most efficient way to detect the tensor modes), which may very well be an extraordinarily difficult task if /, happens to be very small. [Pg.136]

Satellite altimeter observations were assimilated in two BSGC models 1.5-layer model with a reduced gravity acceleration [46] and in the slightly modified model [44,45] considered above. In the former model, the altimeter sea level was assimilated directly into the equations of continuity at each time step. In the latter model [47], the assimilation was similar to that in [44,45], where the differences between the model and observed temperature and salinity fields were retrieved from the level increments with the use of corresponding coefficients of proportionality. These coefficients depended on the depth and were determined from the relations between the SLE and the thermohaline fields obtained in [43] from the modeling results. Selected simplifications in the model physics helped to decrease the horizontal step of the grid in both of the calculations down to 7 km. [Pg.184]


See other pages where Relations Between Physical Observables is mentioned: [Pg.24]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.703]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.3]   


SEARCH



Physical Observations

Physical observables

Relation between

Relations physics)

© 2024 chempedia.info