Recrossing assumption reaction rate theory

The key idea that supplements RRK theory is the transition state assumption. The transition state is assumed to be a point of no return. In other words, any trajectory that passes through the transition state in the forward direction will proceed to products without recrossing in the reverse direction. This assumption permits the identification of the reaction rate with the rate at which classical trajectories pass through the transition state. In combination with the ergodic approximation this means that the reaction rate coefficient can be calculated from the rate at which trajectories, sampled from a microcanonical ensemble in the reactants, cross the barrier, divided by the total number of states in the ensemble at the required energy. This quantity is conveniently formulated using the idea of phase space. 

The transition state theory (TST) may be considered to be established in 1941 by publication of a momunental book The Theory of Rate Processes [1. In Chapter VIII of the book, the authors discuss solution reactions and conclude. . that the ratedetermining step in solution is. .. the formation from the reactants of an activated complex which subsequently decomposes . Though the authors pointed out the importance of diffusion in bimolecular reactions, they did not consider a possible break down of their two key assumptions, that is, thermal equilibrium between the initial and the transition state and neglecting recrossing, in imimolecular rate processes. The remarkable success of TST in the interpretation of kinetic effects of pressure [2] turned the attention of high-pressure kineticists away from a possible failure of TST and efforts were concentrated on the interpretation of the activation volume obtained from pressure dependence of a rate constant fe at a constant temperature (Eq. 3.1). 

A number of MD studies on various unimolecular reactions over the years have shown that there can sometimes be large discrepancies (an order of magnitude or more) between reaction rates obtained from molecular dynamics simulations and those predicted by classical RRKM theory. RRKM theory contains certain assumptions about the nature of prereactive and postreactive molecular dynamics it assumes that all prereactive motion is statistical, that all trajectories will eventually react, and that no trajectory will ever recross the transition state to reform reactants. These assumptions are apparently not always valid otherwise, why would there be discrepancies between trajectory studies and RRKM theory Understanding the reasons for the discrepancies may therefore help us learn something new and interesting about reaction dynamics. 

One fundamental assumption in classical transition state theory is that of no recrossing over the transition state. The advantage, of the RP theory is therefore that since it provides a hamiltonian it can be used in dynamical calculations thereby incorporating the effect of recrossing. However, it is also possible to use the hamiltonian for an estimate of the transmission factor, i.e. the correction to transition state theory from recrossing of the trajectories. An additional correction factor comes from quantum tunneling (see below). Considering the reaction rate constant it may be expressed as... 

To calculate rate constants for bimolecular systems, Eqs (7.19) and (7.20) are used. An equivalent theory can be derived for unimolecular reactions. In a unimolecular reaction only one reactant forms a transition state through radiation or in an apparent unimolecular reaction through collision, which results in product generation. Applying similar assumptions as above (classical motion when crossing the barrier, no recrossing events, and thermal equilibrium) leads to the canonical rate constant, given by... 

---