Recovery total cholesterol

Recovery of the standard lipoproteins and the total lipoprotein fraction was examined on the basis of total cholesterol concentration, and was found to be satisfactory as follows 85.3 6.0 % for chylomicrons+VLDL, 94 5 % for LDL,... 

During the course of recovery from cholestasis major changes are observed in the activity of alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyltransferase and the concentrations of bilirubin. Triglycerides decrease, HDL cholesterol and A-I increase, while total cholesterol and Apo-B remain essentially unchanged. 

For inhibition, cells are incubated for 15 minutes with mpCD at 37°C (10 mM, in the absence of serum). The inhibition is reversible when cholesterol or serum is added. The inhibitory effect is still present after one hour, but total recovery occurs after three hours. Recovery can be delayed by adding... 

For larger samples with high fat contents extracted with an SFE with a solid trap as the collection device, it is helpful to stop every 10 minutes in the second extraction sub-step to rinse a 600-pL reconstitution volume into the collection vial. This aids in full recovery of the fats, since a solid trap has a limited mass capacity that is defined by the open volume between and within the packing particles (typically, 0.5-0.7 mL). The total 1.80 mL (sum of the three sub-rinses) is vortexed prior to injecting an aliquot into the HPLC. There are many alternate means of the quantitation in addition to the HPLC assay [16]. The analyst should choose the appropriate one for the equipment available in the laboratory. Tables 5 and 6 provide the conditions for the cholesterol-lipid fractionation from cod-liver oil. 

Therefore, if the recipient cell does not express the specific lipids required by the receptor (which may concern the acyl chain content of sphingolipids), or an adequate cholesterol-sphingolipid balance, the transfection experiment may lead to an abxmdant expression of a totally inactive receptor. In 2003, Opekarova and Tanner published a list of more than 30 membrane proteins whose activity is specifically affected by lipids. The list covered a broad range of proteins expressed by various bacteria, yeasts, insect, and mammalian cells. The problem is particularly acute when mammalian receptors or transporters are expressed in bacteria. For instance, the failure to express fxmctional serotonin transporters in E. coli has been attributed to the lack of cholesterol in bacteria. Moreover, the recovery of fully active neurotensin and adenosine receptors in transfected bacteria required the presence of choles-teryl hemisuccinate (a cholesterol derivative) during solubilization. Paradoxical results have also been obtained for some proteins whose activity requires cholesterol but can be fxmctionally expressed in bacterial hosts. In this case, one can exclude a direct interaction of cholesterol with the protein but rather consider a more general effect of the sterol on membrane properties. As a matter of fact, we are just at the beginning of our comprehension of the complex molecular ballet that involves bofh lipid and protein actors in the plasma membrane of excitable cells. 

---