Recovery rate average

Quarter Dates Cumulative Months Average Recovery Rate (gal/hr) Recovery (gal) Quarter Cumulative ... 

Zhou et al. (2005) determined anethole composition quantitatively by GC in the fruit of I. verum from various places in the Guangxi province. The average recovery rate and the RSD were 102.31 and 1.78%, respectively. The content of anethole in the fruit of I. verum from various places was more than 4.5%. 

Figure 5. Average recovery rate on the SPE of three kinds of explosives nitrate esters (NE), cyclic nitroamines (CNA), and nitroaromatics (NA) and summarized T value as a function of (a) specific surface area and (b) pore volume of carbon adsorbents.

For sites 417/418, the fluxes are calculated from the super composite, which is dominantly composed of materials from sites 417 and 418A and offer a grand average for these sites. In its upper 200 m, this composite includes about 20% of the oxidatively weathered materials from site 417A. Sites 417/418 and 735 are the only deep drill holes displaying average recovery rates >70%, allowing a quantitative reconstruction of... 

Tab. 1 Ions used for quantitation and recoveries of selected compounds from high-purity water (n = 4 Triphenylphosphinoxide n =2 Clofibric acid n = 3). The data represent average recovery rates and relative standard deviations. The chemical names of the pharmaceutical drugs and HHCB can be found in chapter 3.1.2 and Dsikowitzky (2002).

The within-series imprecision of the method is 2% for an average vanadium concentration of 10.2 figlL. The mean recovery rate was calculated to 97.5% and the analytical detection limit calculated as three times the standard deviation of the blank around 1 fig/L. Parallel determinations of the urine samples with an adsorptive inverse voltammetric method (Seiler, 1993) resulted in a coefficient of correlation of 0.992 (y = l.03 x - 0.17), the comparison with the ICP-OES method (Schramel, 1994) a correlation coefficient of 0.986 (y = 0.96 x 4- 1.97) in a concentration range from 1 to 25 fig/L (Fleischer et al., 1991). 

Therefore, using the assumed recovery rate, we may calculate the cash flows of the bond under each of the possible scenarios. For any given yield r, we can then calculate the present value of the bond s cash flows for each of these scenarios. These are denoted by PVi, PV2,. .., PVt- and PV +i. Letp(r) be the probability-weighted average for aU the possible scenarios, shown by Equation (8.5) ... 

Fons (1994) studied the term structure of credit risk based on the historical default probabilities, ratings and recovery rates. In fact, he proposes a bond pricing model in which the value depends on the probability of default and average recovery rate. The model presented is based on the following assumptions ... 

By the application and observation of top-coal caving at the ends of 43B2 working face, it is known that the periodical pressure step is average of 14.3 m, and the biggest incidence is average of 2.05 m, and the excessive amount of recovery coal is 54966.6 t, and the recovery rate is improved about 5.8%. 

Recovery rates for individual obligors differ by issuer and industry classification. Rating agencies publish data on the average prices of all defaulted bonds, and generally analysts will construct a database of recovery rates by industry and credit rating for use in modelling the expected recovery rates of assets in the collateral portfolio. 

High-yield defaults in Europe in both 2001 and 2002 produced weighted average recovery rates significantly below US historical averages. Investors recovered just 11% of par value on 2001 defaults and 15% of par on 2002 defaults. In the United States, recovery rates on... 

September 2002. Hence, investors lost approximately 86% of par value on 2001 and 2002 defanlts. In the United States, the weighted average recovery rates were 30% of par in 2001 and 23% of par in 2002. Excluding fallen angel defanlts though, which in 2001 boosted average recovery rates and in 2002 depressed recovery rates, US recovery rates were just 15% of par in 2001 and had improved to 28% of par in 2002. 

What is noteworthy is that the recovery rates for telecommunication defaults were nearly parallel in the two markets. They averaged 11.5% and 13.7% of par in the United States in 2001 and 2002, respectively, and 8% and 12% of par in Europe. Since the cable sector in Europe shared many of the same characteristics of the beleaguered telecommunication sector, the average recovery rate on defaulted cable bonds in Europe was also low at 15% of par. (In contrast, recovery rates on cable bonds in the United States were 53% and 41% in 2001 and 2002, respectively.) Considering that the overwhelming volume of defaults in Europe came from the two sectors, it is therefore apparent that the primary reason for the low recovery rates in Europe was this industry concentration. 

---