Reconcile case

SUMMARY OF SIMULATE/OPTIMIZE/PARAMETER/ RECONCILE CASES... 

Both the Parameter and Reconcile cases determine (calculate) the same set of parameters. However, these cases do not get the same values for each parameter. A Parameter case has an equal number of unknowns and equations, therefore is considered "square" in mathematical jargon. In the Parameter case, there is no objective function that drives or affects the solution. There are typically the same measurements, and typically many redundant measurements in both the Parameter and Reconcile case. In the Parameter case we determine, by engineering analysis beforehand (before commissioning an online system for instance) by looking at numerous data sets, which measurements are most reliable (consistent and accurate). We "believe" these, that is, we force the model and measurements to be exactly the same at the solution. Some of these measurements may have final control elements (valves) associated with them and others do not. The former are of FIC, TIC, PIC, AIC type whereas the latter are of FI, TI, PI, AI type. How is any model value forced to be exactly equal to the measured value The "offset" between plant and model value is forced to be zero. For normally independent variables such as plant feed rate, tower... 

The first two validation cases are Parameter cases, while the third is a Reconcile case. In the first two cases only primary reformer calculations are... 

Validation Case 3 (Primary Secondary Reformer Butane Feed Reconcile Case)... 

This approach allows the relationship between firing duties and catalyst temperatures, if available, (derived from [DMC] controller steady-state gains) to be used, with all of the intercepts being updated as parameters, determined primarily by the measured catalyst temperatures. ITie catalyst temperatures are matched precisely at the solution of each Reconcile case. 

The optimization component of process integration drives the iterations between synthesis and analysis toward an optimal closure. In many cases, optimization is also used within the synthesis activities. For instance, in the targeting approach for synthesis, the various objectives are reconciled using optimization. In the structure-based synthesis approach, optimization is typically the main framework for formulating and solving the synthesis task. 

The question of how to terminate the box is fundamental to all the calculations of interfacial energy in compounds, including the calculation of surface energies. It has been addressed previously for particular cases by Chetty and Martin [11,12]. These authors pointed out that a suitable termination is one which is on a symmetry plane of the crystal, or which follows symmetry planes if it is not parallel to the boundary. However, it may not always be possible to find a symmetry plane. I offer a solution here which is more general. It reconciles the atomistic picture with the thermodynamic limit. 

A further difficulty in the case of fluoro-, chloro- and bromobenzenes is that with them apparently no choice of the 8 values seems to be reconcilable with the observed order of ease of substitution at the various positions unsubstituted benzene > para > ortho > meta. Both the inductive and the resonance effects are seen to leave the charge on the w-position practically unchanged, and approximately equal to 1.00c, while the observed order demands a considerably smaller value. As in the case of naphthalene, however, we shall find later that this discrepancy can apparently be explained by taking into account the polarization of the molecule by the attacking group. 

There are three methods of release detection that are associated with modem tank systems.18,22 The first approach is to conduct an annual tank or line tightness test to detect small releases and to use more frequent monitoring by another method to detect large releases. All tank and line tightness tests must be performed at least once a year and must be able to detect leaks of 0.38 L/h (0.1 gal/h). In all cases where annual tightness tests are used, the regulation requires an additional form of leak detection in which tests on tanks are conducted at least monthly and those on pressurized lines at least hourly this ensures the detection of excessively large releases. For tanks, daily inventory records must be reconciled monthly, for pressurized lines, leaks of up to 11.4 L/h (3 gal/h) must be reliably detected. 

How can these photochemical and electrochemical data be reconciled With the benzylic molecules under discussion, electron transfer may involve the n or the cr orbital, giving rise to stepwise and concerted mechanisms, respectively. This is a typical case where the mechanism is a function of the driving force of the reaction, as evoked earlier. Since the photochemical reactions are strongly down-hill whereas the electrochemical reaction is slightly up-hill at low scan rate, the mechanism may change from stepwise in the first case to concerted in the second. However, regardless of the validity of this interpretation, it is important to address a more fundamental question, namely, whether it is true, from first principles, that a purely dissociative photoinduced electron transfer is necessarily endowed with a unity quantum yield and, more generally, to establish what are the expressions of the quantum yields for concerted and stepwise reactions. 

As a simple case, reconcile a single data set for the stream flows as follows ... 

Solution. The reconciled results in Table E16.4 are obtained by solving the optimization problem with the process model as the only set of constraints. Because all constraints are linear, an analytical solution exists to the problem, as given in Equation 16.11. This results in an 89.6% reduction in the sum of the absolute error. Note that all reconciled values are positive and hence feasible. It is not unusual for some reconciled flow rates to go negative, in which case it is necessary to solve the problem using a constrained minimization code such as QP. 

TABLE 3 Comparison of Actual, Measured, and Reconciled Data for Case 4 in Table 2... 

---