Reasoning rules

MHS exponents than their coil analogs), but it is a reasonable rule of thumb for many polymers. MHS exponents are conveniently found in references such as Du et al. (2) or Grulke (3). 

Generally the name of a compound should correspond to the most stable tautomer (76AHCS1, p. 5). This is often problematic when several tautomers have similar stabilities, but is a simple and reasonable rule whose violation could lead to naming phenol as cyclohexadienone. Different types of tautomerism use different types of nomenclature. For instance, in the case of annular tautomers both are named, e.g., 4(5)-methylimidazole, while for functional tautomerism, usually the name of an individual tautomer is used because to name all would be cumbersome. In the case of crystal structures, the name should reflect the tautomer actually found therefore, 3-nitropyrazole should be named as such (97JPOC637) and not as 3(5)-nitropyrazole. 

The approximate solution (x 2.8 X 10-6) is much smaller than the term 0.050 in the denominator of Equation 9-12. Therefore, the approximate solution is fine. A reasonable rule of thumb is to accept the approximation if x comes out to be less than 1 % of F. 

Also in 1993, in Holmes v Hotel San Remo, the Appeals Tribunal State of Nevada Employment Security Department found that the claimant was ineligible for benefits due to discharge for misconduct violation of a known and reasonable rule. Employees were notified that the employer would comply with the Drug Free Workplace Act and random hair analysis testing would occur following a 90-day grace period. Holmes hair test indicated recent cocaine use. She was found to be ineligible for benefits. 

When the linear variable (x) in a quadratic equation is added to or subtracted from a much larger number, it can often be disregarded if it is sufficiently small. A reasonable rule of thumb for determining whether the variable can be disregarded in equilibrium calculations is this If the exponent of 10 in the K value is —3 or less ( 4, —5, 6, etc.),... 

The situation with absolute reasoning rules is more complex since the likelihood of biotransformations can be reasoned depending on factual and heuristic elements such as rates of occurrence in the literature and any known inter-species variations, as well as numerical factors such as substrate lipophilicity and molecular weight. These can be calculated internally or obtained through adaptors to external packages in the same way as for Derek for Windows. 

The answer is C. By increasing the amoxmt of aluminum used by the first student, there will not be an increase in the yield because Fe O is the limiting reagent. Hence, Choice A is not correct. The same reasoning rules out Choice B. Increasing the amount of Fe Oj by the second student will... 

The terms Aj may have essentially any distribution. As a general rule of thumb, if the A s are approximately normally distributed, then the central limit theorem is a very good approximation when > 4. If the distribution of the A s has no prominent mode(s), that is, approximately uniformly distributed, then N > 12 is a reasonable rule of thumb for applicability of the central limit theorem. 

For reasonable accuracy, one usually needs a minimum of 100 points, so we shall take Sr = 0.1 to give us 100 points. As is evident from the derivation of the Numerov method, Sr must be small. A reasonable rule might be to have 5, no greater than 0.1. 

The above reasoning rules out the formation of any truly ionic or covalent bonds between the phenothiazine nucleus and I2. Thus no new infrared absorption band associated with such bands may be produced. 

Patient/doctor self-state reasoning rules. 

Table 1. Fuzzy reasoning rules for the TIP Evaluation local model. 

The output variable of the local fuzzy reasoning model for TIP evaluation is presented in Figure 6. This variable is at the same time the input variable for the device evaluation model. The example assumed fuzzy reasoning rules are shown in Table 1. 

Table 1. The example of some fuzzy reasoning rules for Competency.

The Table 1 presents several fuzzy reasoning rules used in the fuzzy inference system for determining the Competency. 

---