Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Real surface crossing

Understanding the mechanism of this nonadiabatic radiationless decay is central to explaining excited state processes. There are two possible mechanisms (see nonadiabatic reactions in Figure 1). When real surface crossings exist (conical intersection, see left side of Figure 1) and are accessible, the Landau-... [Pg.89]

As a consequence, real surfaces will not exhibit such evenly sized terrace or evenly spaced kinks as suggested by Fig. 8.12. The terrace-ledge-kink (TLK) model [332] can provide a more realistic description of vicinal surfaces. The distribution of the terrace widths is calculated taking into account the entropic repulsion between ledges. The confinement of a ledge between two neighboring steps (that cannot be crossed) leads to a reduction of the number... [Pg.157]

Oxide materials which are attractive because of their catalytic activity are often employed in the form of finely divided powders of considerable surface area. The history of the material and the preparation technique employed are important aspects to be considered when electrokinetic data are compared. Oxide powders can be hot pressed into sintered pellets, supported, or impregnated, on to carbons of high specific area, and bonded with Teflon or other inert material into composite electrodes. Microporosity of the system may produce an ill-defined surface zone flooded by electrolyte with imprecise ratio of real surface area to geometric cross-section. Sput-... [Pg.248]

It may be good to note here that various molecular cross-sections have now been considered. In the treatment of adsorption on solid surfaces was introduced. Interpreting this area in terms of lattice models is not a property of the adsorptive molecule but of the adsorbent. It is possible to imagine a situation where greatly exceeds the real molecular cross-section. On the other hand, for mobile monolayers on homogeneous surfaces is the real molecular cross-section or, for that matter, it is the excluded area per molecule. To avoid an undue abundance of symbols we have used the same symbol for both situations, for instance in table 3.3 in sec. 3.4e. It is to be expected that a and a, obtained by compression of monolayers, are more similar to the a s for adsorbed mobile monolayers on homogeneous substrates than to those for localized monolayers. [Pg.229]

The obtained results allow us to calculate the scattering cross section and the corresponding effective damping coefficient. However, the real surface films usually can be considered as two-dimensional colloid sys-... [Pg.108]

Surface roughness is an important property in electrochemistry of solid electrodes as the most of edl and adsorption characteristics, as well as kinetic parameters, are extensive quantities and are referred to the apparent unit (flat cross-section) area of electrode surface [1-5]. The examination of the working area of solid electrodes is a difficult matter owing to the irregularities at a submicroscopic level. For the determination of the real surface area of the solid electrodes, different in situ and ex situ methods have been proposed and used, which are discussed in Refs. [5, 23]. The in situ methods more commonly used in electrochemistry to obtain the surface roughness... [Pg.191]

Uniformity of the current distribution is important, since the current density in Eq. (62) is calculated per unit of real surface area, while the sensitivity of the EQCM is related to the unit area of cross section of the piezoelectrically sensitive region of the resonator, and the area of the... [Pg.86]

Figure 11.1. Various features of real surfaces shown in cross-section reasonably flat regions are called terraces changes in height of order a few atomic layers are called steps terraces of a different orientation relative to the overall surface are referred to as facets small features are referred to as islands. In the direction perpendicular to the plane of the figure, terraces, steps and facets can be extended over distances that are large on the atomic scale, but islands are typically small in all directions. Figure 11.1. Various features of real surfaces shown in cross-section reasonably flat regions are called terraces changes in height of order a few atomic layers are called steps terraces of a different orientation relative to the overall surface are referred to as facets small features are referred to as islands. In the direction perpendicular to the plane of the figure, terraces, steps and facets can be extended over distances that are large on the atomic scale, but islands are typically small in all directions.
Thu bricks were joined in pairs, being crossed at right angles thus, so that, supposing each brick to be 4 inches wide, the surface of I contact would be 16 square inches. The real surface, or surface I of effectual contact, was, in every case, found by actual measore-ment. The mortar joint separating the bricks was made about of an inch thick and,in order (hat this mortar should in all cases be equally consolidated, each pair of bricks was submitted to the pressure of 600 lbs. fur 5 minutes, immediately after beingjoined. [Pg.143]

As mentioned previously, real surface area (RSA) of a catalyst is one of the most important parameters when it comes to its evaluation. Part of RSA which participates in electrochemical reaction is denoted as electrochemically active surface area (ESA or EASA). However, it should be noted that ESA is usually smaller than RSA (determined by some non-electrochemical method such as gas physisorption analysis, particle size measurement etc.) due to the possibility that entire surface of the electrocatalyst is not available to electrolyte. Hence, the ratio between ESA and RSA gives catalyst utilization. The ration between ESA and geometrical cross section of an electrode gives roughness factor (Rf). There are number of different approaches to determine RSA, both electrochemical and non-electrochemical, however one should note that when electrochemical method is used it is ESA what is determined. These methods are summarized and critically overviewed by Trasatti and Petrii [13], while following section will focus on specific electrochemical methods based on voltammetry. [Pg.14]

Now we make the usual assumption in nonadiabatic transition theory that non-adiabaticity is essential only in the vicinity of the crossing point where e(Qc) = 0- Therefore, if the trajectory does not cross the dividing surface Q = Qc, its contribution to the path integral is to a good accuracy described by adiabatic approximation, i.e., e = ad Hence the real part of partition function, Zq is the same as in the adiabatic approximation. Then the rate constant may be written as... [Pg.137]

Figure 0.4 shows a vector field u on which I have drawn a surface S. The surface could correspond to a real physical boundary (such as a metallic surface, or the boundary between air and water), or it could just be an abstract entity. Lines of u cross the surface, and we speak colloquially of the flux of u through the surface. Again speaking colloquially, the more lines through S, the greater the flux. I will have cause to mention flux in this volume, so we need to investigate the concept in mure detail. [Pg.9]

Fawcett et a/.317-319 have studied the Hg/EtOH interface in the presence of various anions (BIv, CIO , Cl", Br , I-). The surface activity of the anions has been found to increase in the above order. The double-layer data for Hg/EtOH have been found to be similar to those for MeOH,127,293 with some difference attributable to the bigger size of EtOH molecules. The double-layer thickness has been found to differ from that expected from the real cross section of the solvent molecules. [Pg.59]

For the electrolyte as a whole, the effects associated with cations and anions crossing the surface layer cancel, and Eq. (7.17) is valid, with both the chemical and the real ionic solvation energies. Next, we describe ways of theoretically calculating the solvation energies of individual ions or of calculating them from indirect experimental data. [Pg.109]


See other pages where Real surface crossing is mentioned: [Pg.90]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.2058]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.2058]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.2271]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.1188]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.822]    [Pg.40]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.91 ]




SEARCH



Real crossing

Real surface

Surface crossings

© 2024 chempedia.info