Real adsorbed solution theory

Real adsorbed solution y (VLE) Real adsorbed solution theory (RAST) Multiphase real adsorbed solution theory (MRAST)... 

This method is known as PRAST (predictive real adsorbed solution theory). The activity coefficients and of the two corrrporrents a and b of a birraiy adsorbate solutiorr, which is diluted, are given by the equations... 

There are two approaches to dealing with these nonideal behaviors in the adsorption process. One accounts for the nonideality of the adsorbed phase with the introduction of an activity coefficient this method is called the real adsorbed solution theory, or RAST [31 33]. In RAST, Eq. (1) is replaced by... 

However, the pure lAST cannot always be applied to modeling adsorption equilibria. Several experimental works (Uke Ref 81) have reported deviations of the adsorbed phase from ideal mixing. The adsorption equihbrium theory based on Eq. (42) with nonunity activity coefficients y is called RAST (Real Adsorbed Solution Theory). Even this theory has been foimd to not always be adequate. Whereas most of the bulk mixtures show positive deviations from ideal mixing of the values of the molar volumes, deviations for the mixed adsorbed phases are more often negative [82]. Distinctive behavior of the adsorbed mixtures is usually explained by the fact that the adsorbate is heterogeneous [83]. 

Engineering theories for multicomponent adsorption can be roughly divided into three categories extensions of the Langmuir equation, the thermodynamic approach (ideal and real adsorbed solution theories, lAST and RAST) by Myers and Prausnitz (1965) and finally the potential adsorption theory, especially as extended to multi-component systems by Shapiro and co-workers (Shapiro and Stenby, 1998 Monsalvo and Shapiro, 2007a, 2009a,b). 

Thermodynamic (ideal and real) adsorbed solution theories (lAST and RAST)... 

Three theories for multicomponent adsorption have been presented, the extension of Langmuir s theory to multicomponent systems, the ideal and real adsorbed solution theories (lAST, RAST) and the multicomponent potential adsorption theory (MPTA). 

Ideal Adsorbed Solution Theory. Perhaps the most successful approach to the prediction of multicomponent equiUbria from single-component isotherm data is ideal adsorbed solution theory (14). In essence, the theory is based on the assumption that the adsorbed phase is thermodynamically ideal in the sense that the equiUbrium pressure for each component is simply the product of its mole fraction in the adsorbed phase and the equihbrium pressure for the pure component at the same spreadingpressure. The theoretical basis for this assumption and the details of the calculations required to predict the mixture isotherm are given in standard texts on adsorption (7) as well as in the original paper (14). Whereas the theory has been shown to work well for several systems, notably for mixtures of hydrocarbons on carbon adsorbents, there are a number of systems which do not obey this model. Azeotrope formation and selectivity reversal, which are observed quite commonly in real systems, ate not consistent with an ideal adsorbed... 

This study firstly aims at understanding adsorption properties of two HSZ towards three VOC (methyl ethyl ketone, toluene, and 1,4-dioxane), through single and binary adsorption equilibrium experiments. Secondly, the Ideal Adsorbed Solution Theory (IAST) established by Myers and Prausnitz [10], is applied to predict adsorption behaviour of binary systems on quasi homogeneous adsorbents, regarding the pure component isotherms fitting models [S]. Finally, extension of adsorbed phase to real behaviour is investigated [4]. 

The IAS theory was later extended to account for the adsorption of gas mixtures on heterogenous surfaces [52,53]. It was also extended to calculate the competitive adsorption isotherms of components from hquid solutions [54]. At large solute loadings, the simplifying assumptions of the LAS theory must be relaxed in order to account for solute-solute interactions in the adsorbed phase. The IAS model is then replaced by the real adsorbed solution (RAS) model, in which the deviations of the adsorption equilibrium from ideal behavior are lumped into an activity coefficient [54,55]. Note that this deviation from ideal beha dor can also be due to the heterogeneity of the adsorbent surface rather than to adsorbate-adsorbate interactions, in which case the heterogeneous IAS model [55] should be used. 

Chapters 2 to 4 deal with pure component adsorption equilibria. Chapter 5 will deal with multicomponent adsorption equilibria. Like Chapter 2 for pure component systems, we start this chapter with the now classical theory of Langmuir for multicomponent systems. This extended Langmuir equation applies only to ideal solids, and therefore in general fails to describe experimental data. To account for this deficiency, the Ideal Adsorption Solution Theory (lAST) put forward by Myers and Prausnitz is one of the practical approaches, and is presented in some details in Chapter 5. Because of the reasonable success of the IAS, various versions have been proposed, such as the FastlAS theory and the Real Adsorption Solution Theory (RAST), the latter of which accounts for the non-ideality of the adsorbed phase. Application of the RAST is still very limited because of the uncertainty in the calculation of activity coefficients of the adsorbed phase. There are other factors such as the geometrical heterogeneity other than the adsorbed phase nonideality that cause the deviation of the IAS theory from experimental data. This is the area which requires more research. 

Recognizing the deficiency of the extended Langmuir equation, despite its sound theoretical footing on basic thermodynamics and kinetics theories, and the empiricism of the loading ratio correlation, other approaches such as the ideal adsorbed solution theory of Myers and Prausnitz, the real adsorption solution theory, the vacancy solution theory and the potential theory have been proposed. In this section we will discuss the ideal adsorbed solution theory and we first develop some useful thermodynamic equations which will be used later to derive the ideal adsorbed solution model. 

It is worthwhile to compare the predictions of the potential adsorption theory with those of the ideal adsorption solution theory, the lAST, described in Section IVA. Both theories use the same number of fitted parameters. Analysis of experimental data considered on the basis of the lAST has been performed in the original article [81]. The authors found a large discrepancy between lAST estimates and experimental data. The experimental activity coefficients of different components in binary adsorbates vary Ifom 0.412 to 1.054, whereas the LAST assumes their values to be unity. In order to improve the correlations, the Costa et al. [81] had to go from lAST to real adsorption solution theory, using the Wilson equation with additional binary interaction parameters for the adsorbate. This significantly increased the number of fitted parameters and decreased the predictivity of the correlation. 

Unfortunately, the available experimental results suggest that the column saturation capacity is often not the same for the components of a binary mixture, so Eq. 4.5 does not account accurately for the competitive adsorption behavior of these components [48]. A simple approach was proposed to turn the difficulty (next subsection). Although it is applicable in some cases, more sophisticated models seem necessary. Numerous isotherm models have been suggested to solve this problem. Those resulting from the ideal adsorbed solution (IAS) theory developed by Myers and Prausnitz [49] are among the most accurate and versatile of them. Later, this theory was refined to accormt for the dependence of the activity coefficients of solutes in solution on their concentrations, leading to the real adsorption solution (RAS) theory. In most cases, however, the equations resulting from IAS and the RAS theories must be solved iteratively, which makes it inconvenient to incorporate those equations into the numerical calculations of column dynamics and in the prediction of elution band profiles. 

For very dilute solutions, hence at low spreading pressiues, the concentrations of the adsorbates are also low, and the activity coefficients in the adsorbed phase approach unity. For real solutions, a suitable model of the activity coefficients must be used. Several such models have been suggested. The following equation, proposed by Gamba et al. [62] and based on the regular solution theory [63], was applied by Kaczmarski et al. [51] to account for the competitive isotherm of 1-indanol on cellulose tribenzoate ... 

Constant Pattern Behavior In a real system the finite resistance to mass transfer and axial mixing in the column lead to departures from the idealized response predicted by equilibrium theory. In the case of a favorable isotherm the shock wave solution is replaced by a constant pattern solution. The concentration profile spreads in the initial region until a stable situation is reached in which the mass transferrate is the same at all points along the wave front and exactly matches the shock velocity. In this situation the fluid-phase and adsorbed-phase profiles become coincident. This represents a stable situation and the profile propagates without further change in shape—hence the term constant pattern. 

The determination of the real surface area of the electrocatalysts is an important factor for the calculation of the important parameters in the electrochemical reactors. It has been noticed that the real surface area determined by the electrochemical methods depends on the method used and on the experimental conditions. The STM and similar techniques are quite expensive for this single purpose. It is possible to determine the real surface area by means of different electrochemical methods in the aqueous and non-aqueous solutions in the presence of a non-adsorbing electrolyte. The values of the roughness factor using the methods based on the Gouy-Chapman theory are dependent on the diffuse layer thickness via the electrolyte concentration or the solvent dielectric constant. In general, the methods for the determination of the real area are based on either the mass transfer processes under diffusion control, or the adsorption processes at the surface or the measurements of the differential capacitance in the double layer region [56],... 

An approach similar to PC has been proposed by Mohihier et al. (MNM theory) Their basic idea was to treat the adsorbed layer as a two-component non-electrolyte solution called the surface solu-The field effect as well as any correlation to molecular or structural properties of the surface solution are missing from the original MNM theory. At this stage this theory differs a little from a curve fitting procedure. In subsequent papers the introduction of the field effect has been attempted following the TPC approach.Thus the MNM theory and its extensions do not offer a real alternative approach to the theoretical description of adsorption on electrodes. 

Rate constants can be estimated by means of transition-state theory. In principle all thermodynamic data can be deduced from the partion function. The molecular data necessary for the calculation of the partion function can be either obtained from quantum mechanical calculations or spectroscopic data. Many of those data can be found in tables (e.g. JANAF). A very powerful tool to study the kinetics of reactions in heterogeneous catalysis is the dynamic Monte-Carlo approach (DMC), sometimes called kinetic Monte-Carlo (KMC). Starting from a paper by Ziff et al. [16], several investigations were executed by this method. Lombardo and Bell [17] review many of these simulations. The solution of the problem of the relation between a Monte-Carlo step and real time has been advanced considerably by Jansen [18,19] and Lukkien et al. [20] (see also Jansen and Lukkien [21]). First principle quantum chemical methods have advanced to the stage where they can now offer quantitative predictions of structure and energetics for adsorbates on surfaces. Cluster and periodic density functional quantum chemical methods are used to analyze chemisorption and catalytic surface reactivity [see e.g. 24,25]. 

---