Reactor train selecting

The manipulators and cameras have all been ordered and are programmed to be delivered to Heysham and Torness with sufficient time for commissioning, firstly on the Storage Test Training Facility (STTF)(this will not be available when the first manipulators are delivered), and then In the reactors on selected routes. Identical equipment will be supplied to both power stations and the Remote Inspection Project is responsible for managing the technical aspects of the Torness work on behalf of SSEB. 

WSRC, DPSOP 38, "Reactor Personnel Selection, Qualification, and Training Manual," Revision 35, October 1990. 

In the design of a fine chemicals plant equally important to the choice and positioning of the equipment is the selection of its size, especially the volume of the reaction vessels. Volumes of reactors vary quite widely, namely between 1,000 and 10,000 L, or ia rare cases 16,000 L. The cost of a production train ready for operation iacreases as a function of the 0.7 power. The personnel requirement iacreases at an even lower rate. Thus a large plant usiag large equipment would be expected to be more economical to mn than a small one. 

The Tokuyama Soda single-step catalyst consists of a zirconium phosphate catalyst loaded with 0.1—0.5 wt % paHadium (93—97). Pilot-plant data report (93) that at 140°C, 3 MPa, and a H2 acetone mole ratio of 0.2, the MIBK selectivity is 95% at an acetone conversion of 30%. The reactor product does not contain light methyl substituted methyl pentanes, and allows MIBK recovery in a three-column train with a phase separator between the first and second columns. 

Problem Definition InteUigent selection of a separator requires a careful and complete statement of the nature of the separation problem. Focusing narrowly on the specific problem, however, is not sufficient, especi ly if the separation is to be one of the steps in a new process. Instead, the problem must be defined as broadly as possible, beginning with the chemical reactor or other source of material to be separated and ending with the separated materials in their desired final form. In this way the influence of preceding and subsequent process steps on the separation step will be iUuminated. Sometimes, of course, the new separator is proposed to replace an existing unit the new separator must then fit into the current process and accept feed materials of more or less fixed characteristics. At other times the separator is only one item in a train of new equipment, all parts of which must work in harmony if the separator is to be effective. 

Motivation Unit tests require a substantial investment in time and resources to complete successfully. This is the case whether the test is a straightforward analysis of pump performance or a complex analysis of an integrated reactor and separation train. The uncertainties in the measurements, the likelihood that different underlying problems lead to the same symptoms, and the multiple interpretations of unit performance are barriers against accurate understanding of the unit operation. The goal of any unit test should be to maximize the success (i.e., to describe accurately unit performance) while minimizing the resources necessary to arrive at the description and the subsequent recommendations. The number of measurements and the number of trials should be selected so that they are minimized. 

The next two steps after the development of a mathematical process model and before its implementation to "real life" applications, are to handle the numerical solution of the model s ode s and to estimate some unknown parameters. The computer program which handles the numerical solution of the present model has been written in a very general way. After inputing concentrations, flowrate data and reaction operating conditions, the user has the options to select from a variety of different modes of reactor operation (batch, semi-batch, single continuous, continuous train, CSTR-tube) or reactor startup conditions (seeded, unseeded, full or half-full of water or emulsion recipe and empty). Then, IMSL subroutine DCEAR handles the numerical integration of the ode s. Parameter estimation of the only two unknown parameters e and Dw has been described and is further discussed in (32). 

Various catalysts can be used for converting methanol to DME and water (ref. 11). The fixed-bed MTG process uses a 7-alumina catalyst which has high selectivity for methanol conversion to DME and water and low selectivity for methanol decomposition and coke. These properties are important as any loss of methanol to byproducts directly affects gasoline yield. Commercially, it is preferred to have one DME reactor per ZSM-5 train. Thus, high coke formation in the DME catalyst would necessitate the additional expense of multiple DME reactors. 

As another example of how the overall process objective can affect the selection of the tuning criterion, consider the CSTR and separation train shown in Figure 15.44. If the level controller for the CSTR is tuned loosely, the CSTR level can change significantly. Because the production rates of the various products are related to the residence time in the reactor, large variations in the CSTR level directly affect the product distribution. The resulting composition changes in the stream... 

A conventional FPS, shown in Fig. 14.2, includes a reformer, two WGS reactors, and two Preferential Oxidation (PrOx) reactors, located downstream of the WGS. For PEM fuel cells, it is a necessity to assure < 10 ppm of CO in the cell stack. These reactors form a considerable fraction of the FPS weight, volume, and cost. Replacing this train by an integrated hydrogen permeation selective membrane on the water gas shift reactor, shown in Fig. 14.3, results in a considerable reduction in the number of components, cost, and volume of the FPS. This will make fuel cell power plants practical and affordable for power generation in a wide range of applications, especially for residential and transportation. Numerous published works [8, 9] in the area of catalytic membrane reactors can be quoted in the experimental [10] and numerical [11, 12] domains. 

DOE 5480.20, PERSONNEL SELECTION, QUALIFICATION, TRAINING AND STAFFING REQUIREMENTS AT DOE REACTOR AND NONREACTOR NUCLEAR FACILITIES. 

---