Reaction Barriers and Potential Energy Surfaces

Hammett, L. P. Physical Organic Chemistry, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill New York, 1970 p. 120. 

Reaction coordinate diagram for an Sn2 reaction. The reaction coordinate represents two parallel (but opposite in direction) bond distance measurements. 

Schematic representation of structure-energy reiationships in SnI reactions. 

If two states, as for example, a transition state and an unstable intermediate, occur consecutively during a reaction process and have nearly the same energy content, their interconversion will involve only a small reorganization of the molecular structures.  

---

See, for example, D. L. Bunker, /. Chem. Phys., 40,1946 (1963). Monte Carlo Calculations. IV. Further Studies of Unimolecular Dissociation. D. L. Bunker and M. Pattengill,/. Chem. Phys., 48, 772 (1968). Monte Carlo Calculations. VI. A Re-evaluation erf Ae RRKM Theory of Unimolecular Reaction Rates. W. J. Hase and R. J. Wolf, /. Chem. Phys., 75,3809 (1981). Trajectory Studies of Model HCCH H -P HCC Dissociation. 11. Angular Momenta and Energy Partitioning and the Relation to Non-RRKM Dynamics. D. W. Chandler, W. E. Farneth, and R. N. Zare, J. Chem. Phys., 77, 4447 (1982). A Search for Mode-Selective Chemistry The Unimolecular Dissociation of t-Butyl Hydroperoxide Induced by Vibrational Overtone Excitation. J. A. Syage, P. M. Felker, and A. H. Zewail, /. Chem. Phys., 81, 2233 (1984). Picosecond Dynamics and Photoisomerization of Stilbene in Supersonic Beams. II. Reaction Rates and Potential Energy Surface. D. B. Borchardt and S. H. Bauer, /. Chem. Phys., 85, 4980 (1986). Intramolecular Conversions Over Low Barriers. VII. The Aziridine Inversion—Intrinsically Non-RRKM. A. H. Zewail and R. B. Bernstein,... 

The 7-shifting method depends on our ability to identify a unique bottleneck geometry and is particularly well suited to reactions that have a barrier in the entrance channel. For cases where there is no barrier to reaction in the potential energy surface, a capture model [149,150,152] approach has been developed. In this approach the energy of the centrifugal barrier in an effective onedimensional potential is used to define the energy shift needed in Eq. (4.41). For the case of Ai = 0, we define the one-dimensional effective potential as (see Ref. 150 for the case of AT > 0)... 

In contrast to S-matrix elements, these observables do not depend on the entire potential energy surface. Pn is infiuenced only by the potential energy surface on the reactant side of the reaction barrier and the region in the vicinity of the barrier. The potential energy surface further on the product side has no impact on pn It only decides upon the specific quantum states in which the products are formed. Thus, the calculation of initial state-selected reaction probabilities only requires the treatment of a reduced portion of the potential energy surface. It causes less numerical effort than a full S-matrix calculation. 

At the time the experiments were perfomied (1984), this discrepancy between theory and experiment was attributed to quantum mechanical resonances drat led to enhanced reaction probability in the FlF(u = 3) chaimel for high impact parameter collisions. Flowever, since 1984, several new potential energy surfaces using a combination of ab initio calculations and empirical corrections were developed in which the bend potential near the barrier was found to be very flat or even non-collinear [49, M], in contrast to the Muckennan V surface. In 1988, Sato [ ] showed that classical trajectory calculations on a surface with a bent transition-state geometry produced angular distributions in which the FIF(u = 3) product was peaked at 0 = 0°, while the FIF(u = 2) product was predominantly scattered into the backward hemisphere (0 > 90°), thereby qualitatively reproducing the most important features in figure A3.7.5. 

The vibrationally excited states of H2-OH have enough energy to decay either to H2 and OH or to cross the barrier to reaction. Time-dependent experiments have been carried out to monitor the non-reactive decay (to H2 + OH), which occurs on a timescale of microseconds for H2-OH but nanoseconds for D2-OH [52, 58]. Analogous experiments have also been carried out for complexes in which the H2 vibration is excited [59]. The reactive decay products have not yet been detected, but it is probably only a matter of time. Even if it proves impossible for H2-OH, there are plenty of other pre-reactive complexes that can be produced. There is little doubt that the spectroscopy of such species will be a rich source of infonnation on reactive potential energy surfaces in the fairly near future. 

It should be stressed that although these symmetry considerations may allow one to anticipate barriers on reaction potential energy surfaces, they have nothing to do with the thermodynamic energy differences of such reactions. Symmetry says whether there will be symmetry-imposed barriers above and beyond any thermodynamic energy differences. The enthalpies of formation of reactants and products contain the information about the reaction s overall energy balance. 

Fig. 13.11. A schematic drawing of the potential energy surfaces for the photochemical reactions of stilbene. Approximate branching ratios and quantum yields for the important processes are indicated. In this figure, the ground- and excited-state barrier heights are drawn to scale representing the best available values, as are the relative energies of the ground states of Z- and E -stilbene 4a,4b-dihydrophenanthrene (DHP). [Reproduced from R. J. Sension, S. T. Repinec, A. Z. Szarka, and R. M. Hochstrasser, J. Chem. Phys. 98 6291 (1993) by permission of the American Institute of Physics.]...

At R > 400 pm the orientation of the reactants looses its importance and the energy level of the educts is calculated (ethene + nonclassical ethyl cation). For smaller values of R and a the potential energy increases rapidly. At R = 278 pm and a = 68° one finds a saddle point of the potential energy surface lying on the central barrier, which can be connected with the activated complex of the reaction (21). This connection can be derived from a vibration analysis which has already been discussed in part 2.3.3. With the assistance of the above, the movement of atoms during so-called imaginary vibrations can be calculated. It has been attempted in Fig. 14 to clarify the movement of the atoms during this vibration (the size of the components of the movement vector... 

Figure 2.4. Reaction coordinate diagram for a simple chemical reaction. The reactant A is converted to product B. The R curve represents the potential energy surface of the reactant and the P curve the potential energy surface of the product. Thermal activation leads to an over-the-barrier process at transition state X. The vibrational states have been shown for the reactant A. As temperature increases, the higher energy vibrational states are occupied leading to increased penetration of the P curve below the classical transition state, and therefore increased tunnelling probability.

In qualitative terms, the reaction proceeds via an activated complex, the transition state, located at the top of the energy barrier between reactants and products. Reacting molecules are activated to the transition state by collisions with surrounding molecules. Crossing the barrier is only possible in the forward direction. The reaction event is described by a single parameter, called the reaction coordinate, which is usually a vibration. The reaction can thus be visualized as a journey over a potential energy surface (a mountain landscape) where the transition state lies at the saddle point (the col of a mountain pass). 

From the given Hamiltonian, adiabatic potential energy surfaces for the reaction can be calculated numerically [Santos and Schmickler 2007a, b, c Santos and Schmickler 2006] they depend on the solvent coordinate q and the bond distance r, measured with respect to its equilibrium value. A typical example is shown in Fig. 2.16a (Plate 2.4) it refers to a reduction reaction at the equilibrium potential in the absence of a J-band (A = 0). The stable molecule correspond to the valley centered at g = 0, r = 0, and the two separated ions correspond to the trough seen for larger r and centered at q = 2. The two regions are separated by an activation barrier, which the system has to overcome. 

---